Enameloplasty effects on microleakage of pit and fissure sealants under load: an in vitro study

Enameloplasty has been implicated in the successful application of pit and fissure sealants. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of enameloplasty technique on microleakage of sealants when occlusal force was applied on the teeth. The study also allowed a direct comparison of the effectiveness of enameloplasty, when two different burs were used. Six groups of ten human extracted wisdom teeth were tested. Group A: no load, conventional (no enameloplasty--control); Group B: no load, enameloplasty 1/2 round bur (Brasseler USA); Group C: no load, enameloplasty diamond fissure bur REF/UP 791 (Ultradent); Group D: load 500 N, conventional, Group E: load 500 N, 1/2 round bur; Group F: load 500 N, diamond fissure bur. Specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles at 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C with a dwell time of 30 seconds after load application. Microleakage was scored as distance of dye penetration with 0 = no microleakage and 3 = microleakage to underling fissure. The Kruskal-Wallis One Way Anova and Mann-Whitney U test showed group D having the greatest degree of microleakage statistically significant (p < 0.05) comparing with other groups. Sealants prepared with the conventional technique (A, D) had statistically significant differences in microleakage with those prepared with enameloplasty (B, C, E, F) (p = 0.01). Enameloplasty in groups with no load (B, C) did reduce microleakage, but not significantly (p = 0.3). However, loaded teeth with enameloplasty appeared to perform superior, as compared to those without (p = 0.005). Regarding the effect of load, teeth without load (Groups A, B, C) were found to have significantly less microleakage than teeth where mechanical force had been applied (Groups D, E, F), (p = 0.01). Microleakage in Group A (conventional technique without load) was significantly less than microleakage in Group D (conventional technique with load), (p = 0.04). However, load did not seem to influence microleakage when enameloplasty had been performed. This finding was true for both round bur enameloplasty (p = 0.29), and fissure bur enameloplasty (p = 0.26). There was no statistically significant difference between Groups B, E (round bur) and C, F (fissure bur) (p > 0.05), or between Groups B and C (p > 0.05) and between Groups E and F (p > 0.05). The results of the study indicated that enameloplasty reduced microleakage of pit and fissure sealants, especially when load was applied to teeth, irrespective of what bur was used to enlarge the fissure, as there was no statistical significant differences between the round and fissured diamond burs. The application of occlusal force to the tooth produces significantly more microleakage, unless enameloplasty is performed.

1. Cueto EI, Buonocore MG. Sealing of pits and fissures with an adhesive resin: its use in caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc 75: 121- 8, 1967.

2. Borem LM, Feigal RJ. Reducing microleakage of sealant under salivary contamination: digital-image analysis evaluation. Quintessence Inter 25: 283-289, 1994.

3. Ferguson F, Ripa L. Evaluation of the retention of two sealants applied by dental students. J Dent Educ 44: 494, 1980.

4. Feigal RJ et al. Retaining sealant on salivary contaminated enamel. J Am Dent Assoc 124: 88-97, 1993.

5. Weintraub JA. The effectiveness of pit and sealant. J Public Health Dent 49: 317-330, 1989.

6. Ripa LW. The current status of pit-fissure sealant [review]. J Cana Dent Assoc 51: 367-377, 1985.

7. Ripa LW. Sealant revisited. An update of the effectiveness of pit and fissure sealant. Car Res 27 (Suppl. 1) 77-82, 1993.

8. Kidd EAM, Joyston - Bechal S. Update on fissure sealants. Dent Update 21: 323-6, 1994.

9. Park K, Penugonda B. Pit and fissure sealants. Current status. NY State Dent J 58: 27-29, 1992.

10. Boksman L, Carson B. Two year retention and caries rates of Ultraseal XT and fluoroshield light cured pit and fissure sealants. Gen Dent 46: 184-7, 1998.

11. Waggoner W, Siegal M. Pit and fissure sealants application: Updating the technique. J Am Dent Assoc 127: 351- 361, 1996.

12. Main C, et al. Surface treatment studies aimed at streamline fissure sealant application. J Oral Rehabil 10: 307, 1983.

13. Weaks LM, Lescher NMB, Barnes CM, et al. Clinical evaluation of the prophy jet as an instrument for routine removal of tooth stain and plaque. J Periodontal 55: 486-488,1984.

14. Garcia-Godoy F, De Araujo FB. Enhancement of fissure sealant penetration and adaptation. The enameloplasty technique. J Clin Pediatr Dent 19: 13-8, 1994.

15. Weerheijm KL, Gruythuysen RJ, van Amerongen WE. Prevalence of hidden caries. J Dent Child 59: 408-412, 1992.

16. Kramer PF, Zelante F, Simonto M. The immediate and long-term effects of invasive and noninvasive pit and fissure sealing techniques on the microflora in occlusal fissures of human teeth.Pediat Dent 15: 108-12, 1993.

17. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Wright GZ, Braverman I. Microleakage of sealants after conventional, bur and airabrasion preparation of pits and fissures. Pediat Dent 20: 3, 173-176, 1998.

18. Boj JR, Xalabrade A, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of fissure sealants after enameloplasty. Pediatr Dent 17: 143 (Abstr), 1995.

19. Xalabarde A, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR, Canaida C. Fissure micro-morphology and sealant adaptation after occlusal enameloplasty. J Clin Pediatr Dent 20: 299-304, 1996.

20. Garcia-Godoy F, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of acid solution and gel in occlusal fisssures. J Am Dent Assoc 14: 809-810, 1987.

21. Le Bell Y, Forsten L. Sealing of preventive enlarged fissures. Acta Odontol Scand 38: 101-104, 1980.

22. Shapira J, Eidelman E. The influence of mechanical preparation of enamel prior to etching on the retention of sealants. Three year follow-up. J Pedont 8: 272-274, 1984.

23. Shapira J, Eidelman E. Six year clinical evaluation of fissure placed after mechanical preparation: a matced pair study. Pedi-atr. Dent. 8: 204-205, 1986.

24. Shiota K, Yaoi H, Yamauchi T. Submicroscopic structure and histogenesis of “Rodless Enamel”. Jap J Oral Biol 11: 41-48, 1963.

25. Ripa LW, Gwinnett AJ, Buonocore MS. The “prismless” outer layer of deciduous and permanent enamel.Arch Oral Biol 11: 41-48, 1956.

26. Horsted M, Fejerskov O, Larsen MJ. The structure of surface enamel with special reference to occlusal surfaces of primary and permanent teeth. Caries Res 10: 87-296, 1979.

27. Hansen EK. Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resin in dentin cavities. J Dent Res 65: 1319-1321, 1991

28. Goel VK, Khera SC, Singeh K. Clinical implications of enamel and dentin to mastication loads. J Prosthet Dent 64: 446-54, 1990.

29. Jörgensen KD, Matono R, Shimokobe H. Deformation of cavities and resin fillings in loaded teeth. Scand J Dent Res 84: 46-50, 1976.

30. Taylor CL, Gwinnett AJ. A study of the penetration of sealants into pits and fissures. J Am Dent Assoc 87: 1181-1188, 1973.

31. De Craene GP, Martens C, Dermant R. The invasive pit and fissure sealing technique in pediatric dentistry: a SEM study of a preventive restoration. J Dent Child 34-42, 1984.

32. Shapira J, Eidelman E. Six year clinical evaluation of fissure placed after mechanical preparation: a matced pair study. Pedi-atr. Dent. 8: 204-205, 1986.

33. Gerke DC. Modified enameloplasty-fissure sealant technique using an acidetch resin method. Quintessence Int 18: 387-90, 1987.

34. Howell AH, Brudevold F. Vertical forces used during chewing of food. J Dent Res 29: 133-136, 1950.

35. Rigsby DF, Retief DH, Bidez MN, et al. Effect of actual load and temperature cycling on microleakage of resin restorations. Am J Dent 5: 155-159, 1992.

36. Qvist V.The effect of mastication on marginal adaptation of composite restorations in vivo. J Dent Res 62: 904-906, 1983.

37. Zervou C. et al. An in vitro study of microleakage of pit and fissure sealants in the presence of occlusal forces. J Clin Pediatr Dent 24: xx, 2000.

38. Miyoshi S, Nakata T, Nishijima S. Scanning electron microscopy of prismless enamel in human teeth.Archs Oral Biol, 17: 359-362, 1972.

39. Kodaka T, Kuroiwa M, Higashi S. Structural and distribution patterns of surface “prismelss” enamel in human permanent teeth. Caries Res 25: 7-20, 1991.

40. Gwinnett AJ, Buonocore MG. A scanning electron microscope study of pit and fissure surfaces conditioned for adhesive healing. Archives of Oral Biol. 17: 415-423, 1972.

41. Gwinnett AJ. Human prismless enamel and its influence on sealant penetration. Arch Oral Biol 18: 441-444, 1973.

42. Gwinnett AJ. The bonding of sealants to enamel. J Am Soc Prev Dent 3: 21-9, 1973.