Efficacy of dentin adhesives in primary and permanent teeth

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of dentin adhesives and to examine

acid resistance in primary and permanent teeth. The efficacy of dentin adhesives was evaluated by

SEM observation and by measuring the wall-to-wall polymerization contraction gap and dentin hardness

before and after conditioning. The detailed mechanism of dentin bonding was the same in both

primary and permanent teeth.

1. Malferrari S, Finger WJ, Garcia-Godoy F. Resin bonding efficacy of gluma 2000 to dentine of primary teeth: an in vitro study. Int J Paediatr Dent 5: 73-79, 1995.

2. Malferrari S, Finger WJ, Garcia-Godoy F. The effect of etching time with gluma 2000 conditioning solution on shear bond strength of a composite resin and micromorphology of the enamel. Int J Paediatr Dent 4: 217-224, 1994.

3. Timothy RF, James JC, Mark EJ, Yvonne C, Brian C. A compar-ison of two dentin bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 8: 144-146, 1986.

4. Bordin-Aykroyd SB, Sefton J, Davies E H. In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and per-manent teeth. Dent Mater 8: 74-78, 1992.

5. Sumikawa D A, Marshall GW, Gee L, Marshall SJ. Microstruc-ture of primary tooth dentin: Pediatr Dent 21: 439-444, 1999.

6. Koutsi V, Noonan RG, Homer JA, Simpson MD, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. The effect of dentin depth on the permeability and ultrastructure of primary molars. Pediati Dent 16: 29-35, 1994.

7. Mazzeo N, Norman W, Hondrum SO. Resin bonding to primary teeth using three adhesive systems. Pediatr Dent 17: 112-115, 1995.

8. Salama FS, Tao L. Comparison of gluma bond strength to pri-mary vs. permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 13: 163-165, 1991.

9. Dolrudee J. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 21: 223-229, 1997.

10. Faika Y, Abdel M. Shear bond strength of Dyract compomer material to dentin of primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 21: 305-310, 1997.

11. Asmussen E. Composite restorative resins. Composition versus wall-to-wall polymerization contraction. Acta Odont Scand 33: 3- 21, 1975.

12. Aysegul O. Comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22: 293-298,1998.

13. Nakabayashi N. Resin reinforced dentin due to infiltration of monomers into the dentin at the adhesive interface. J J Dent Mater 1: 78-81, 1982.

14. Munksgaard EC, Asmussen E. Bond strength between dentin and restorative resins mediated by mixtures of HEMA and glu-taraldehyde. J Dent Res 63: 1087-1089, 1984.

15. Sugizaki J. The effect of the carious primers on the dentin adhe-sion of resin composites SEM and TEM observations of the resin-impregnated layer and adhesion promoting effect of primers. Jpn J Conserv Dent 34: 228-265, 1991.

16. Gwinnett Al, Kanca III JA. Micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 5: 73-77, 1992.

17. Inokoshi S, Hosoda H, Harniratissai C, Shimada Y, Tastumi T. A study on the resin impregnated layer of dentin. Part 1, A com-parative study on the decalcified and undecalcified sections and the application of argon ion beam etching to disclose the resin-impregnated layer of dentin. Jpn J Conserv Dent 33: 427-442, 1990.

18. Hasegawa T, et al. Effect of mechanical properties of resin com-posite on the efficacy of dentin bonding system. Oper Dent 24: 323- 330, 1999.

19. Chiba M, Itoh K, Wakumoto S. Effect of dentin cleansers on the bonding efficacy of dentin adhesive. Dent Mater J 8: 76-85, 1989.

20. Manabe A et al. Effect of functional monomer in commercial dentin bonding agents use of an experimental dentin bonding system. Dent Mater J 18: 116-123, 1999.

21. Chigira H et al. Bonding efficacy and interfacial microstructure between resin and dentine primed with glyceryl methacrylate. J Dent 26: 157-163, 1998.