Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
The diastemas in deciduous dentition: the relationship to the tooth size and the dental arches dimensions
1Department of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, U.S.C. Santiago de Compostela Dental School
2Department of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, U.C.M. Madrid Dental School
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.1.d31684214173564k Vol.26,Issue 1,September 2001 pp.65-70
Published: 01 September 2001
*Corresponding Author(s): M. Facal-García E-mail: miguelfacal@ctv.es
Tooth size and different arch parameters were studied for influence in the presence or absence of diastemas in the primary dentition. The size of teeth scarcely influences the presence or absence of diastemas, but the dental arch dimensions are closely connected with diastemas.
M. Facal-García,J. de Nova-García,D. Suárez-Quintanilla. The diastemas in deciduous dentition: the relationship to the tooth size and the dental arches dimensions. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2001. 26(1);65-70.
1. Moyers RE, Van der Linden FGM Riolo ML, Mc Namara JA. Standards of human occlusal development. Monograph nº 5, Crainofacial growth series. Center for Human Growth and Development University of Michigan. Ann Arbor 5: 7-164, 1976.
2. Van der Linden FPGM. Theoretical and practical aspects of crowding in the human dentition. JADA 89: 139-153, 1974.
3. Le Bot P.Aspects antropologiques et génétiques des mensurations dentaires. Revue d´Orthopedie Dento Faciale 10: 71-96, 1976.
4. Baume LJ. Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion. I. The biogenic course of the deciduous dentition. J Dent Res 29: 123-132, 1950.
5. Baume LJ. Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion. III. The biogenesis of the succes-sional dentition. J Dent Res 29: 338-348, 1950.
6. Sanin C, Savara BS, Clarkson QC. Thomas DR. Prediction of occlusion by measurements of the deciduous dentition. Am J Orthod 57: 561-572, 1985.
7. Foster TD, Grundy MC. Occlusal changes from primary to per-manent dentitions. Brit J Orthodont 13: 187-193, 1986.
8. Bishara S, Khadivi P, Jacobsen JR. Changes in tooth size-arch length relationships from the deciduous to the permanent denti-tion: A longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 108: 607- 613, 1995.
9. El-Nofelly A, Sadek L, Soliman N. Spacing in the human decidu-ous dentition in relation to tooth size and dental arch size. Archs Oral Biol 34: 437-441, 1998.
10. Moorrees CF, Chadha MJ. Available space for the incisors during dental development. A growth study based on physiologic age. The Angle Orthod 35: 12-22, 1965.
11. Inamura M, Sakuma T. Mesio distal crown diameter and arch size of deciduous dentition in Japanese born between 1970-1975. Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi, Japanese J Pediatr Dent 25: 501-511, 1987.
12. Gonzalez-Cuesta FJ, Tejero A, Wang E. Estudio epidemiológico de las maloclusiones en dentición temporal en una muestra de 434 preescolares. Odontología Pediátrica 4: 15-22, 1995.
13. Lewis SJ. Some aspects of dental arch growth. J Am Dent A 23: 277- 284, 1936.
14. Moorrees CFA, Gran AM, Lebret LML, Yen PKJ, Frohlich FJ. Growth studies of the dentition: A review. Am J Orthod 55: 600-616, 1960.
15. Moorrees CFA, Reed R. Changes in dental arch dimensions expressed on the basis of tooth eruption as a measure of biologic age. J Dent Res 44: 129-141, 1965.
16. Tejero A, Plasencia E, Lanuza A. Estudio Biométrico de la den-tición temporal. Rev Esp Ortod 21: 167-179, 1991.
17. Howe R, Mc Namara JA, O´Connor A. A examination of dental crowding an its relationship to tooth size and arch dimension. Am J Orthod 83: 363-373, 1983.
Top