Microleakage and penetration depth of three types of materials in fissure sealant: self-etching primer vs etching: an in vitro study

Clinical preventive procedures must be done after a risk assessment. One of the risk factors is the occlusal morphology of the posterior teeth. These caries-free fissures must be sealed. This first in vitro experimentation of the study evaluated the microleakage and the penetration depth of three types of materials by Vivadent: Helioseal F®,Tetric®,Tetric Flow®. The teeth were etched with phosphoric acid and bonded using a one bottle bonding in order to determine the best material for the sealing of the fissure. The depth of penetration of fuschine dye as well as that of the tested material was measured with a grid. The results, compared to the depth of the fissures, are expressed in percentage of penetra-tion. The results were as follows: penetration of fuschine dye: 0 % for the 2 composites, 100 % for Helioseal F®; penetration of the materials: 96.90 % for Hélioseal F®, 70.82 for Tetric® and 86.10 for Tet-ric Flow® (significant difference, Wilcoxon test = 0.0105). In this first in vitro study, Tetric Flow® shows no microleakage and is more efficient when compared to Helioseal F® and Tetric® in obturating deep fissures of non carious bicuspids. The second experiment of the study evaluated the microleakage and the penetration depth of Tetric Flow® when it is bonded by two different methods: Group 1: total etch (phosphoric acid) and Scotch-bond 1® (3M), and Group 2: self-etching primer with Prompt® (Espe). There was no significant difference (p > 0.03) between classical bonding vs self-etching primer. The self-etching primer Prompt® is very efficient vs phosphoric acid in obturating the fissures of non car-ious bicuspids with Tetric Flow®. It is concluded that for prevention by sealing, using a flowable ceromer (Tetric Flow®) with the self-etching (Prompt®), is a really good technique.

1. Sailly JC, Lebrun T, Mennerat F. C.O.M.E.: situation de la santé buccodentaire en France, état des lieux, orientations stratégiques. 1ere ed, Toulouse, p. 172, 1995.

2. Buonocore MG. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34: 849–53, 1955.

3. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc June suppl 131: 20–25, 2000.

4. Fortin D,Vargas MA. The spectrum of composites: new tech-niques and materials. J Am Dent Assoc June suppl 131: 26–30, 2000.

5. Rethman J. Trends in preventive care: caries risk assessment and indications for sealants. J Am Dent Assoc June suppl 131: 8–12, 2000.

6. Twetman S. Infant oral health. Dent Clin North Am 44: 487–505, 2000.

7. Kidd E. Caries management. Dent Clin North Am 1999 43: 743–64, 1999.

8. ten Cate JM. Fluoride mechanisms. Dent Clin North Am 43: 713–42, 1999.

9. Dummer PM, Addy M, Oliver SJ. Changes in the distribution of decayed and filled tooth surfaces and the progression of approx-imal caries in children between the ages of 11 – 12 years and 15 – 16 years. Brit Dent J 164: 277–281, 1988.

10. Messer LB, Cline JT. Relative caries experience of sealed versus unsealed permanent posterior teeth: a three-year study. J Dent Child 47: 175–82, 1980.

11. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Della-Giustina VE, Brooks JE, Williams JE, Fairhurst. A comparative study of two pit and fissure sealants: results after 41/2 years in Augusta, Ga. J Am Dent Assoc 103: 235–38, 1981.

12. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealants after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc 122: 34–42, 1991.

13. Gilpin JL. Pit and fissure sealants: a review of literature. J Dent Hygiene 71: 150–8, 1997.

14. Feigal RJ. Sealants and preventive restorations: review of effec-tiveness and clinical changes for improvement. Pediatr Dent 20: 85–92, 1998.

15. Dennisson JB, Straffon LH, Smith RC. Effectiveness of sealant treatment over five years in an insured population. J Am Dent Assoc 131: 597–605, 2000.

16. White JM, Eakle S. Rationale and treatment approach in mini-mally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc June suppl 131: 13–19, 2000.

17. Frank RM, Sommermater J, Lacoste JL. Essai clinique de prévention de la carie dentaire par scellement des fissures. Rev Mensuelle Suisse d’Odonto-Stomatologie 81: 543–547, 1971.

18. Ripa LW. Sealants revisited :An update of the effectiveness of pit en fissure sealants. Caries Res 27(suppl 1): 77–82, 1993.

19. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 129: 567–577, 1998.

20. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 24: 172–80, 1999.