Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 3153
  • Dowloads 185

Original Research

Open Access

A comparison between zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cement in the orthodontic band cementation

  • Banu Dincer1,*,
  • Aslihan M. Ertan Erdinc1

1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, Bornova, 35100, Izmir, Turkey

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.3.r730148542380658 Vol.26,Issue 3,July 2002 pp.285-288

Published: 01 July 2002

*Corresponding Author(s): Banu Dincer E-mail: banudincer2@ yahoo.com

PDF (77.16 kB) View Full-text

Abstract

Fixed orthodontic appliances have been held responsible for demineralization and caries since the time they were first introduced. Zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements are the primary mate-rials used in band cementing. In this study, we evaluated the re-cementing frequencies, enamel dem-ineralization and the degree of cement remains of the bands cemented with glass ionomer and zinc polycarboxylate cements. We have concluded that given the retentive properties and enamel decalcifi-cation degree, the glass ionomer cements are to be preferred by the orthodontist.


Cite and Share

Banu Dincer,Aslihan M. Ertan Erdinc. A comparison between zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cement in the orthodontic band cementation. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2002. 26(3);285-288.

URL:

https://www.jjocpd.com/articles/10.17796/jcpd.26.3.r730148542380658

References

1. Sadowsky PL, Retief DH. A comparative study of some dental cements used in orthodontics. The Angle Orthod 46: 171-8, 1976.

2. Balenseifen JW, Modonia JV. Study of dental plaque in ortho-dontic patients. J Dent Res 49: 320-24, 1970.

3. Kocadereli I. Ortodontik simanlardaki gelis¸meler. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi 7: 254-258, 1994.

4. Kocadereli I., Cig˘er S. Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements. J Clin Pediatr Dent 19: 127-130, 1995.

5. Mizrahi E. Glass ionomer cements in orthodontics-An update. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 93: 505-7, 1988.

6. Norris DS, Ledoux PM, Schawaninger B, Weinberg R. Retention of orthodontic bands with new flouride-release cements. Am J Orthod 89: 206-11, 1986.

7. Mizrahi E. Surface distribution of enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 84: 323-31, 1983.

8. Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treat-ment Am J Orthod 82: 62-7, 1982.

9. Smith DC. A new dental cement. Br Dent J 125: 381, 1968.

10. Mizrahi E. The re-cementation of orthodontic bands using dif-ferent cements. Angle Orthod 49: 239-46, 1979.

11. Rich JM, Leinfelder KF, Hershey HG: An in vitro study of cement retention as related to orthodontics. Angle Orthod 45: 219-25, 1975.

12. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 132: 133-5, 1972.

13. Negm MM, Beech DR, Grant AA. An evaluation of mechanical and adhesive properties of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 9: 161-7, 1982.

14. Smith DC. Dental cements-current status and future prospects. Dent Clin North Am 6: 763-92, 1983.

15. Mizrahi E. Success and failure of bonding and banding. A clini-cal study. Angle Orthod 52: 113-7, 1982.

16. Maijer R, Smith DC. A comparison between zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cement in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 93: 273-9, 1988.

17. Mount G. Maximizing glass ionomer cement usage. Aust Orthod J 9: 246, 1985.

18. Mizrahi E, Smith DC. The bond strength of a zinc polycarboxy-late cement: Investigations into the behaviour under varying conditions. Br Dent J 127: 410-14, 1969.

19. Mizrahi E, Cleaton-Jones PE. Decalcification following ortho-dontic treatment. J Dent Res 59B: 935, 1980. (Abstract no: 191)

20. De Freitas JR. The long term solubility of a stannous fluoride zinc-phosphate cement. Aus Dent J 18: 167, 1973.

21. Swartz MC, Phillips RW, Clark HE, Norman RD, Potter R. Fluo-ride distribution in teeth using a silicate model. J Dent Res 59: 1596-1603, 1980.

22. Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denton JC, Switzer P. Enamel and cementum flouride uptake from a glass ionomer cements. Caries Res 18: 250-57, 1984.

23. Swartz MC, Phillips RW, Clark HE. Long term fluoride release from glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 63: 158-60, 1984.

24. Arends J, Christoffersen J. Nature and role of loosely bound flu-oride in dental caries. J Dental Res 69: 601-5, 1990.

25. Mizrahi E, Cleaton-Jones PE, Austin JC. Effects of surface cont-amination on band retention. Am J Orthod 79: 390-8, 1981.

26. Copenhaver DJ. In vitro comparison of glass ionomer cement ability to inhibit decalcification under orthodontic bands (Abstract) Am J Orthod 99: 528, 1986.

27. Clark JR, Phillips RW, Norman RD. An evaluation of silica phos-phate as orthodontic cement. Am J Orthod 75: 190-6, 1977.

28. Fricker JP, McLachlam MD. Clinical studies of glass ionomer cements. Aus Orthod J 9: 179-180, 1985.

29. Kvam E, Broch J, Nissen-Meyer I. Comparison between a zinc phosphate and a glass ionomer cement for cementation of ortho-dontic bands. Eur J Orthod 5: 307-13, 1988.

30. Mizrahi E. Orthodontic band failure rate with glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 65: (Abstract 62), 624, 1986.

31. Ölmez H, Korunmus F, Ölmez S. Farklı simanların baglanma kuvvetlerinin in vitro olarak incelenmesi. Türk Ortodonti Der-gisi 7: 119-122, 1994.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top