Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 742
- Dowloads 153
Original Research
Open AccessA comparison between zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cement in the orthodontic band cementation
A comparison between zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cement in the orthodontic band cementation
1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ege, Bornova, 35100, Izmir, Turkey
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.3.r730148542380658 Vol.26,Issue 3,July 2002 pp.285-288
Published: 01 July 2002
*Corresponding Author(s): Banu Dincer E-mail: banudincer2@ yahoo.com
Abstract
Fixed orthodontic appliances have been held responsible for demineralization and caries since the time they were first introduced. Zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements are the primary mate-rials used in band cementing. In this study, we evaluated the re-cementing frequencies, enamel dem-ineralization and the degree of cement remains of the bands cemented with glass ionomer and zinc polycarboxylate cements. We have concluded that given the retentive properties and enamel decalcifi-cation degree, the glass ionomer cements are to be preferred by the orthodontist.
Cite and Share
Banu Dincer,Aslihan M. Ertan Erdinc. A comparison between zinc polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cement in the orthodontic band cementation. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2002. 26(3);285-288.
References
1. Sadowsky PL, Retief DH. A comparative study of some dental cements used in orthodontics. The Angle Orthod 46: 171-8, 1976.
2. Balenseifen JW, Modonia JV. Study of dental plaque in ortho-dontic patients. J Dent Res 49: 320-24, 1970.
3. Kocadereli I. Ortodontik simanlardaki gelis¸meler. Türk Ortodonti Dergisi 7: 254-258, 1994.
4. Kocadereli I., Cig˘er S. Retention of orthodontic bands with three different cements. J Clin Pediatr Dent 19: 127-130, 1995.
5. Mizrahi E. Glass ionomer cements in orthodontics-An update. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 93: 505-7, 1988.
6. Norris DS, Ledoux PM, Schawaninger B, Weinberg R. Retention of orthodontic bands with new flouride-release cements. Am J Orthod 89: 206-11, 1986.
7. Mizrahi E. Surface distribution of enamel opacities following orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 84: 323-31, 1983.
8. Mizrahi E. Enamel demineralization following orthodontic treat-ment Am J Orthod 82: 62-7, 1982.
9. Smith DC. A new dental cement. Br Dent J 125: 381, 1968.
10. Mizrahi E. The re-cementation of orthodontic bands using dif-ferent cements. Angle Orthod 49: 239-46, 1979.
11. Rich JM, Leinfelder KF, Hershey HG: An in vitro study of cement retention as related to orthodontics. Angle Orthod 45: 219-25, 1975.
12. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 132: 133-5, 1972.
13. Negm MM, Beech DR, Grant AA. An evaluation of mechanical and adhesive properties of polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 9: 161-7, 1982.
14. Smith DC. Dental cements-current status and future prospects. Dent Clin North Am 6: 763-92, 1983.
15. Mizrahi E. Success and failure of bonding and banding. A clini-cal study. Angle Orthod 52: 113-7, 1982.
16. Maijer R, Smith DC. A comparison between zinc phosphate and glass ionomer cement in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 93: 273-9, 1988.
17. Mount G. Maximizing glass ionomer cement usage. Aust Orthod J 9: 246, 1985.
18. Mizrahi E, Smith DC. The bond strength of a zinc polycarboxy-late cement: Investigations into the behaviour under varying conditions. Br Dent J 127: 410-14, 1969.
19. Mizrahi E, Cleaton-Jones PE. Decalcification following ortho-dontic treatment. J Dent Res 59B: 935, 1980. (Abstract no: 191)
20. De Freitas JR. The long term solubility of a stannous fluoride zinc-phosphate cement. Aus Dent J 18: 167, 1973.
21. Swartz MC, Phillips RW, Clark HE, Norman RD, Potter R. Fluo-ride distribution in teeth using a silicate model. J Dent Res 59: 1596-1603, 1980.
22. Retief DH, Bradley EL, Denton JC, Switzer P. Enamel and cementum flouride uptake from a glass ionomer cements. Caries Res 18: 250-57, 1984.
23. Swartz MC, Phillips RW, Clark HE. Long term fluoride release from glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 63: 158-60, 1984.
24. Arends J, Christoffersen J. Nature and role of loosely bound flu-oride in dental caries. J Dental Res 69: 601-5, 1990.
25. Mizrahi E, Cleaton-Jones PE, Austin JC. Effects of surface cont-amination on band retention. Am J Orthod 79: 390-8, 1981.
26. Copenhaver DJ. In vitro comparison of glass ionomer cement ability to inhibit decalcification under orthodontic bands (Abstract) Am J Orthod 99: 528, 1986.
27. Clark JR, Phillips RW, Norman RD. An evaluation of silica phos-phate as orthodontic cement. Am J Orthod 75: 190-6, 1977.
28. Fricker JP, McLachlam MD. Clinical studies of glass ionomer cements. Aus Orthod J 9: 179-180, 1985.
29. Kvam E, Broch J, Nissen-Meyer I. Comparison between a zinc phosphate and a glass ionomer cement for cementation of ortho-dontic bands. Eur J Orthod 5: 307-13, 1988.
30. Mizrahi E. Orthodontic band failure rate with glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 65: (Abstract 62), 624, 1986.
31. Ölmez H, Korunmus F, Ölmez S. Farklı simanların baglanma kuvvetlerinin in vitro olarak incelenmesi. Türk Ortodonti Der-gisi 7: 119-122, 1994.
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top