Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Leakage reduction with a surface-penetrating sealant around stainless-steel orthodontic brackets bonded with a light cured composite resin
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, 1 Kneeland Street, Boston, MA 02111
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.27.3.62hj753784425802 Vol.27,Issue 3,July 2003 pp.271-276
Published: 01 July 2003
In this study a surface penetrating sealant was used around bonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets. The investigation attempted to identify the effect of surface penetrating sealants on the microleakage associated with orthodontic stainless steel brackets bonded with light cured composite resin.
A total of 58 bovine teeth were used for this study, orthodontic brackets were bonded with light cured orthodontic resin. The following groups were assigned: (I) Finished but unsealed, (II) Finished and sealed, and (III,) Un-finished but unsealed The brackets were activated using orthodontic elastics, stained, sectioned, and evaluated under magnification. The following statistical analysis was done Mann-Whitney U test for two independent samples, then confirmed with a Kruskai-Wallis One-Way analysis of variance by ranks. The second and third groups were statistically better in respect of marginal integrity as compared to the first.
Anas Chapra,George E.White. Leakage reduction with a surface-penetrating sealant around stainless-steel orthodontic brackets bonded with a light cured composite resin. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2003. 27(3);271-276.
1. Anderson GB, Bowden J, Marrison EC, Caffesse RG. Clinical effects of chlorhexidine mouthwashes on patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 11: 606- 612, 1997.
2. Banks PA, Richmond S. Enamel sealants: a clinical evaluation of their value during fixed appliance therapy. Euro J Ortho 16: 19- 25, 1994.
3. Belanger G. Effect of tacking time on bond strength of light-cured adhesives. JCO 31: 449-453, 1997.
4. Bowen RL, inventor. Method of preparing a monomer having phenoxy and methacrylate groups linked by hydroxy glycerol groups. U.S. patent 3179623. April 1965.
5. Bowen RL. Properties of a silica-resin-forced polymer for dental restoration. JADA 66: 57-64, 1963
6. Boyd R, Chun YS, Eighteen month evaluation of the effects of a 04% stannous fluoride gel on gingivitis in orthodontic patients, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 105: 35-41, 1994
7. Boyd R. Longitudinal evaluation of a system for self monitoring plaque control effectiveness in the orthodontic patient. J Clin Periodontol 10: 380-388, 1983.
8. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 34: 849- 853, 1955.
9. Christensen GJ. Sorting out the confusing array of resin-based composites in dentistry. JADA 130: 275-277, 1999.
10. Choi K, Condon J, Ferracane J. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 79: 812-817, 2000.
11. Craig GR. Restorative dental materials. CV Mosby, St Louis, Chap 10, 284-276, 1993.
12. Dauvillier B, Feilzer A, DeGee A, Davidson C. Visco-elastic parameters of dental restorative materials during setting. J Dent Res 79: 818-823, 2000.
13. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF, Mazer RB, Russel CM. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. JADA 121: 231-2522, 1990.
14. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. JADA 124: 68-72, 1993.
15. Ericson D, Paulsson L, Sowiak H, Derand T. Reduction of cusp deflection resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage, using a light-transmitting cone. Scand J Dent Re 102: 244-248, 1994
16. Evrenol B, Kucukkeles N, Arun T, Yarat A. Fluoride release capacities of four different orthodontic adhesives. J Clin Pediatr Dent 23: 315-319, 1999.
17. Ferdianakis K, White G. Newer class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration. J Clin Pediatr Dent 23: 201-216, 1999.
18. Ferdinakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22: 22 1-229, 1998.
19. Ferracane IL. Current trends in dental composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 6: 302-318, 1995.
20. Fortin D, Vargas M. The spectrum of composites: new techniques and materials. JADA 131(supp): 26s-30s, 2000.
21. Fournier A, Payant L, Bouclin F. Adherence of streptococcus mutans to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 114: 414-417, 1998.
22. Frazier MC, Southard TE, Doster PM. Prevention of enamel demineralization during orthodontic treatment: an in vitro study using pit and fissure sealants. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 110: 459-465, 1996.
23. Gaworski M,Weinstein M, Bonslow A, Braitman L. Decalcification and bond failure: Acomparison of a glass ionome and a composite resin bonding system in vivo.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 116: 518- 521, 1999.
24. Gorelick L, Geiger AM, Gwinnett AJ. Incidence of white spot formation after bonding and banding. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 81: 93-98, 1982.
25. Gwinnett AJ. Corrosion of resin-bonded orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 82: 441-446, 1982.
26. Haligren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S. Caries associated microflora in plaque from orthodontic appliances retained with glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res 100: 140-143, 1992.
27. ISO/TC 106/SC 1/WG 11, 1991. Dental materials. Guidance on testing of adhesion to tooth structures. Adhesion test methods and accepted as a committee draft at the ISO/TC meeting in Trieste October, 1991.
28. Johnston C, Burden D, Hussey D, Mitchell C. Bonding to molars-the effect of etch time (an in vitro study). Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 20: 195-199, 1998.
29. Joseph Vp, Rossouw PE, Basson NJ. Some “sealants” seal—a scanning electron mictoscopy (SEM) investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 105: 362-368, 1994.
30. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of surface-penetrating sealants on composite wear. Dent Mater 9: 108-113, 1993.
31. Kemp-Scholte C, Davidson C. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restoration effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69: 1240-1243, 1990.
32. Kemp-Scholte C, Davidson C. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 64: 658-664, 1990
33. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: From first to sixth generation. JADA 131: 20s-25s, 2000.
34. Lindauer S, Browning H, Shroff B, Marshall F, Anderson R, Moon P. Effect of pumice prophylaxis on the bond strength of orthodon-tic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 111: 599-605, 1997.
35. Lingstrom P, van Ruyven F, van Houte J, Kent R. The pH of dental plaque in itrs attack of orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 108: 132-141, 1995.
36. Newman relation to early enamel cavities and dental plaque flora in humans. J Dent Res 79: 770-777, 2000.
37. Matasa C.Microbial R.Adhesion and orthodontic plastic attachment: progress report.American journal of orthodontics 51: 901-912, 1965.
38. Oesterle L, Shelihart W, Belanger G. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 114: 514-519, 1998.
39. Ogaard B, Rolla G,Arends J. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization: Part 1. Lesion development. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 94: 68-73, 1988.
40. Ogaard B, Rolla G, Arends J, Cate M. Orthodontic appliances and enamel demineralization: Part 2. Prevention and treatment of lesions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 94: 123-128, 1988.
41. Olea N, Pulgar R, Peres P. et al. Estrogenicity of resin-based com-posites and sealants used in dentistry. Environ Health Prespect 104: 298-305, 1996.
42. Platt Jeffuey. Resin cements: Into the 21st century. Compendium 20: 1173-1181, 1999.
43. Reisner K, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel preparation for orthodon-tic bonding: A comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 111: 366-373, 1997.
44. Shinkai K, Suzuki 5, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. Effect of surface-penetrating sealants on wear resistance or luting agents. Quintessence Int 25: 767-771, 1994.
45. Soderhoim K, Phil M, Mariotti A, BTS-GMA- Based resins in dentistry: are they safe? JADA 130: 201-208, 1999.
46. Titley K, Chernecky R, Rossouw P. Kulkarni G.The effect of various storage methods and media on shear-bond strength of dental composite resin to bovine dentine.Arch Oral Biol 43: 305-311, 1998.
47. Trimpeneers L, Verbeeck R, Dermaut L. Long-term fluoride release of some orthodontic bonding resins: A laboratory study. Dent Mater 14: 142-149, 1998.
48. Torstenson B, Brannstrom M. Composite resin contraction gaps measured with a fluorescent resin technique. Dent Mater 4: 238- 242, 1988.
49. Von Ruyven F, Lingstrom P, von Houte, Kent R. Relationship among mutans streptococci, “low-pH” bacteria, and lodophilic polysaccharide-producing bacteria in dental plaque and early enamel caries in humans. J Dent Res 79: 778-784, 2000.
50. Walls AWG, McCabe JF, Murray JJ.The polymerization contraction of visible-light activated composite resins. J Dent 16: 177-181, 1988.
51. Wenderoth C, Weinstein M, and Borislow A. Effectiveness of a fluoride-releasing sealnt in reducing decalcification during ortho-dontic treatment.Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 116: 518-521, 1999.
52. Wenderoth CJ, Weinstein M, Borislow AJ. Effectiveness of a fluo-ride-releasing sealant in reducing decalcification during orthodon-tic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 116: 629-634, 1999.
53. Yap AU, Tan S, The TY. The effect of polishing systems on micro-leakage of tooth colored restoratives: Part 1. Conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Oral Rehab 27: 117-123, 2000.
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Top