Article Data

  • Views 733
  • Dowloads 139

Case Reports

Open Access

Tongue scrapping as a means of reducing oral mutans streptococci

  • George E. White1,*,
  • Mirna T. Armaleh1

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.28.2.n18275821658263v Vol.28,Issue 2,April 2004 pp.163-166

Published: 01 April 2004

Abstract

Mutans streptococci (MS) are one of the most virulent cariogenic pathogens in the oral cavity. The effects of three oral hygiene techniques on salivary mutans streptococci levels were evaluated to see which mechanism would be most efficient in reducing salivary MS levels. Sixty patients, all in the permanent dentition, were selected and randomly distributed into three groups. Group I was asked to use a tongue scraper to brush the tongue once daily in the morning after normal tooth brushing routine. Group II was asked to place and let dissolve a Listerine Oral Care StripTM on the tongue once daily after normal oral hygiene routine. Group III was asked to rinse once every morning, for thirty seconds, with a saturated saline solution after routine tooth brushing. The instructions were done for a period of seven days. Baseline, one hour, three day, and seven day saliva samples were obtained and plated on CRT“ by Vivadent MS-sensitive agar. All treatments groups show a significant reduction in colony counts from baseline and one or more post treatment periods and at one or more time periods between treatment groups. The most effective treatment in reducing colony counts was seen within Group I “Tongue Scraping” which demonstrated the greatest change from baseline to each of the post treatment periods. The least effective was Group II “Listerine Strip” which showed a statistically insignificant increase in colony count from baseline to 1-Hour and a significant decrease from baseline at the 7-day period only.

Cite and Share

George E. White,Mirna T. Armaleh. Tongue scrapping as a means of reducing oral mutans streptococci. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2004. 28(2);163-166.

References

1. Axelsson P. et al. A 30-month longitudinal study of the effects of some oral hygiene measures on Streptoccus mutans and approximal dental caries. J Dent Res 66: 761-5, 1987.

2. Axelsson, Per. Diagnosis and risk prediction of dental caries. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc, Illinois, 2000.

3. Balbuena et al. Effects of topical antispeptic rinses on bacterial counts of saliva in healthy human subjects. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. 118: 625-9, 1998.

4. Brothwell DJ. et al. An update of mechanical oral hygiene practices: evidence-based recommendations for disease prevention. J Canadian Dent Assoc 64: 295-306, 1998.

5. Charles CH. et al. Comparative efficacy of an antiseptic mouth rinse and an antiplaque/antigingivitis dentifrice. JADA 132: 670-5, 2001.

6. Christen AG. Swanson BZ. Oral hygiene: A history of tongue scraping and brushing. JADA 96: 215-219, 1978.

7. Ciuffreda et al.An in vivo comparison of anti-microbial activities of four commercial mouthwashes. J Clin Dent 5: 103-5, 1994.

8. Ekbom B. Hultgren L. Saltwater rinses can effect plaque formation. Abstract used from Tandlakartidningen (Swedish). 74: 291-5, 1982.

9. Gibbons RJ, Banghart, S. Synthesis of extracellular dextran by cariogenic bacteria and its presence in human dental plaque. Arch Oral Biol 12:11, 1967.

10. Gilmore EL, Bhaskar SN. Effect of tongue brushing on bacterial population. J Southern Calif Dent Assoc 39: 893-5, 1971.

11. Gilmore EL. et al. Effect of tongue brushing on plaque bacteria. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 36: 201-4, 1973.

12. Gross A. Barnes GP. Lyon TC. Effects of tongue brushing on tongue coating and dental plaque scores. J Dent Res 54: 1236, 1975.

13. Gultz et al. An in vivo comparison of the antimicrobial activities of three mouth rinses. J Clin Dent 9: 43-5, 1998.

14. Lindquist et al. Relationship between mutans streptococci in saliva and their colonization of the tooth surfaces. Oral Microbiology & Immunology 4: 71-6, 1989.

15. Menon MV, Coykendall AL. Effect of tongue scraping. J Dent Res 73: 1492, 1994.

16. Okuda K. et al. The efficacy of anti-microbial mouth rinses in oral health care. Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College 39: 7-14, 1999.

17. Pfizer Consumer website: www.oral-care.com 18. Pitten FA, Kramer A. Antimicrobial efficacy of antiseptic mouth rinse solutions. Euro J Clin Pharm 55: 95-100, 1999.

19. Rethman, J. Trends in preventive care: caries risk assessment and indications for sealants. JADA. 131: 8-12. 2000.

20. Rowley EJ. et al. Tongue brushing versus tongue scraping. Clin Preventive Dent 9: 13-6, 1987.

21. Silwood CJ. et al. A multifactorial investigation of the ability of oral health care products to alleviate oral malodour. J Clin Periodont 28: 634-41, 2001.

22. Spielman AI. et al. Halitosis:A common oral problem. NYS Dent J 63: 16-17, 1997.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top