Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 645
- Dowloads 151
Case Reports
Open AccessComparative clinical evaluation of slot versus dovetail Class III
composite restorations in primary anterior teeth
Comparative clinical evaluation of slot versus dovetail Class III composite restorations in primary anterior teeth
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Henri-Denant Road, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Thailand.
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.28.2.n98241p717350438 Vol.28,Issue 2,April 2004 pp.125-130
Published: 01 April 2004
*Corresponding Author(s): Chutima Trairatvorakul E-mail: ctrairat@yahoo.com
Abstract
This study compares the clinical characteristic evaluations of slot against dovetail class III composite restorations. Focusing on the primary anterior teeth of children aged 2 years 6 months to 5 years 3 months with the mean age of 4 years, thirty-six matched pairs of class III of slot and dovetail preparations were made by one investigator. These preparations were evaluated for marginal adaptation, anatomic form, secondary caries and marginal discoloration after 6, 12, and 24 months by another investigator with the intra-examiner reliability of 0.95 – 1 (Kappa Statistic). The results revealed no statistical significance in the difference of clinical characteristics between the two designs (p > 0.05).
Cite and Share
Chutima Trairatvorakul,Supatcharin Piwat. Comparative clinical evaluation of slot versus dovetail Class III composite restorations in primary anterior teeth. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2004. 28(2);125-130.
References
1. Van Meerbeek BV, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26: 1-20, 1998.
2. Triolo PT, Swift EJ. Shear bond strength of ten dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mat 8: 370-374, 1992.
3. Fritz U, Garcia-Godoy F, Finger WJ. Enamel and dentin bond strength and bonding mechanism to dentin of Gluma CPS to primary teeth. J Dent Child 64: 32-38, 1997.
4. Mazzeo N, Ott NW, Hondrum SO. Resin bonding to primary teeth using three adhesive systems. Pediatr Dent 17: 112-115, 1995.
5. Fagan TR, Crall JJ, Jensen ME, Chalkley Y, Clarkson B. A comparison of two dentin bonding agents in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 8: 144-146, 1986.
6. Mathewson RJ, Primosch RE. Fundamentals of pediatric dentistry 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., pp 248- 250, 1995.
7. Curzon MEJ, Roberts JF, Kennedy DE. Kennedy’s paediatric operative dentistry. 4th ed. Oxford Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., pp 89-91, 1996.
8. McEvoy SA. A modified class III cavity preparation and composite resin filling technique for primary incisor. Dent Clin North Am 28: 145-155, 1984.
9. Pinkham JR. Pediatric dentistry infancy through adolescence 3rd ed. Philadelphia W.B. Saunders Co., pp 331-333, 1999.
10. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 30: 347-358, 1980.
11. Qvist V,Thylstrup A, Mjor IA. Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of resin restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 44: 351-356, 1986.
12. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 20: 34-38, 1995.
13. Atkins CO, Rubenstein L, Avent M. Preliminary clinical evaluation of dentinal and enamel bonding in primary anterior teeth. J Pedodont 10: 239-246, 1986.
14. Burke FJ, McCaughey AD. The four generations of dentin bonding. Am J Dent 8: 88-92, 1995.
15. Freedman G, Goldstep F. Fifth generation bonding system: state of the art in adhesive dentistry. J Can Dent Assoc 63: 439-443, 1997.
16. Swift EJ. Bonding systems for restorative materials – a comprehensive review. Pediatr Dent 20: 80-84, 1998.
17. Knight GT, Berry TG, Barghi N, Burns TR. Effects of two methods of moisture control on marginal microleakage between resin composite and etched enamel: A clinical study. Int J Prosth 6: 475-479, 1993.
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top