Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 666
- Dowloads 121
Original Research
Open AccessUse of orthopedic finger distractor for facial asymmetry correction
Use of orthopedic finger distractor for facial asymmetry correction
1Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dental Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
2Division of Orthodontics, Department of Dental Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.29.2.bq3620225611203u Vol.29,Issue 2,April 2005 pp.99-104
Published: 01 April 2005
*Corresponding Author(s): Ajoy Roychoudhury E-mail: ajoyroy@hotmail.com
Abstract
Facial asymmetry after unilateral ankylosis results due to the loss of the condylar growth center on the ankylosed side. This results in the skeletal midline deviating to the affected side, a lack of vertical growth on the same side produces a cant of the occlusal plane and mandibular retrognathism is seen as a result of the hypoplasia. The lower border of the mandibular corpus and angle on the contra lateral side is usually flattened. We report a case of facial asymmetry following unilateral ankylosis, which was treated by a combined approach with distraction osteogenesis and orthodontics. Inexpen-sive orthopedic finger distractors were used. The facial changes were analyzed using the Grummons facial asymmetry analysis.
Cite and Share
Ajoy Roychoudhury,Puneet Batra. Use of orthopedic finger distractor for facial asymmetry correction. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2005. 29(2);99-104.
References
1. Dean A, Alamillos F. Mandibular distraction in temporomandibu-lar joint ankylosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 104: 2021-2031, 1999.
2. Bradley P, James D, Norman JEB. Injuries of the condylar and coronoid processes. In JLL Willians (Ed), Rowe and Williams Maxillofacial injuries. London, Churchill Livingstone, pp405, 1994.
3. Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG. Dental and facial asymme-tries: a review. Angle Orthod 64: 89-98, 1994.
4. Tehranchi A, Behnia H. Treatment of mandibular asymmetry by distraction osteogenesis and orthodontics: a report of four cases. Angle Orthod 70: 165-74, 2000.
5. El Sheikh MM, Medra AM. Management of unilateral temporo-mandibular ankylosis associated with facial assymetry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 25: 109, 1997.
6. Arun T, Kayan F, Kiziltan M. Treatment of condylar hypoplasia with distraction osteogenesis: a case report. Angle Orthod 72: 371- 376, 2002.
7. Cope JB, Samchukov M. Regenerate bone formation and remodelling during mandibular osteodistraction. Angle Orthod 70: 99-111, 2001.
8. Swennen G, Schliephake H, Demph R, Schierle H, Malevez C. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30: 89-103, 2001.
9. Illizarov GA. The principles of the Illizarov method. Bull Hosp J Dis Orthop Inst 48: 1-11, 1988.
10. Codvilla A. On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 2: 353-357, 1905.
11. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89: 1-10, 1992.
12. Davies J,Turner S, Scandy JR. Distraction osteogenesis- a review. British Dent J 185: 462-467, 1998.
13. Sickels JV. Distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 118: 482-4, 2000.
14. Kewitt GF, Van Sickels. Long term effects of mandibular midline distraction osteogenesis on the status of the temporomandibular joint, teeth, periodontal structures and neurosensory function. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57: 1419-25, 1999.
15. Rachmiel A, Aizenbud D, Eleftheriou S, Peled M, Laufer D. Extraoral vs intraoral distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Ann Plast Dsurg 45: 386-394, 2000.
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top