Article Data

  • Views 781
  • Dowloads 144

Original Research

Open Access

An in vitro evaluation of microleakage in class I preparations using 5th, 6th and 7th generation composite bonding agents

  • Theodosis N. Kallenos1
  • Emad Al-Badawi1
  • G.E.White1

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.29.4.b51q018j100403p5 Vol.29,Issue 4,October 2005 pp.323-328

Published: 01 October 2005

Abstract

The intent of this study was to evaluate microleakage of newer generations of dentinal bonding sys-tems of Class I restorations filled with the same resin based composites. Eighty extracted human pre-molar and molar teeth were randomly assigned to four groups for bonding: the 5th generation bond-ing system (Optibond Solo), the 6th generation bonding system (Prompt-L-Pop) and the 7th genera-tion bonding system (iBond), and a control group that was used with no dentinal bonding system. Cavities were prepared 3mm in width, 2mm in depth and 2mm in length. Margins of the cavities were chamfered using a high-speed hand piece with water spray and a #1/2 round diamond bur. The cavi-ties were restored with resin based composites after the application of the dentinal bonding systems according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Upon drying of the teeth, two coats of nail varnish were applied covering the surface of the tooth, excluding the tooth-restoration interface. Samples were thermocycled and immersed in methylene blue dye (0.05%). Each sample was sectioned with an Isomet and evaluated, for microleakage using light microscopy under a measuring microscope at 50x magnification

Statitical significance was determined using the Chi-Square Test. Among the three dentinal adhesive systems used in this study the 5th generation outperformed both the 6th and 7th generation bonding systems.


Cite and Share

Theodosis N. Kallenos,Emad Al-Badawi,G.E.White. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage in class I preparations using 5th, 6th and 7th generation composite bonding agents. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2005. 29(4);323-328.

References

1. Buonocore, M.G. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34: 849-853, 1955.

2. Rosa BT, Perdigao J. Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesisives. Quintessence Int 31: 353-358, 2000.

3. Clifford M. Sturdevant. The art and science of operative den-tistry. Mosby, St. Louis, MO pp 241-246, 1995.

4. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle

G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 71: 1530-1540, 1992.

5. Kanca J III. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 5: 213-221, 1992.

6. Xalabarde A, Garcia-Godoy F, Boj JR, et al. Microleakage of fis-sure sealants after occlusal enameloplasty and thermocycling. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22: 231-235, 1998.

7. Kanca J III. Resin bonding to wet substance. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 23: 39-41, 1992.

8. Chigira H, Yukitani W, Hasegawa A, et al. Self-etching dentin primers containing Phenyl-P. J Dent Res 73: 1088-1095, 1994.

9. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a Phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 73: 1212-1220, 1994.

10. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 13: 25D-30D, 2000.

11. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: A review. J Dent 4: 199-206, 1976.

12. Crim GA. Effect of substrate age on microleakage of dentine adhesive agents. J Oral Rehabil 16: 555-557, 1989.

13. Borem LM, Feigal RJ. Reducing microleakage of sealants under salivary contamination: Digital-image analysis evaluation. Quint Int 25: 283-289, 1994.

14. Simmons EW, Barghi N, Muscott JR. Thermocycling of pit and fissure sealants. J Dent Res 55: 606-610, 1976.

15. Yazici R, Baseren M, Dayangac B. The effect of current-genera-tion bonding systems on microleakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 33: 763-769, 2002.

16. Van Meerbeck B, Williens G, Celis JP, et al. Assessment by nanoindentation of the hardness and elasticity of the dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 72: 1434-1442, 1993.

17. Peters MC, Stoffers KW, Dennison JB, McLean ME, Hamilton JC. Clincial evaluation a new adhesive system: results after 18 months. J Dent Res 80: 64, 2001.

18. Perdigao J, Swift EJ Jr, Lopes GC. Effects of repeated use on bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives. Quintessence Int 30:19-23, 1999.

19. Irinoda Y, Matsumura Y, Kito H, Nakano T, Toyama T, Nakagaki H, Tsuchiya T. Effect of sealant viscosity on the penetration of resin into etched human enamel. Oper Dent 25: 274-282, 2000.

20. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 12: 236-44, 1996.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top