Bond strength and interfacial morphology of two adhesive systems to deciduous dentin: in vitro study

This study evaluated the bond strength and the interfacial morphology of composite restorations (SMP: Scotchbond Multi-Purpose - 3M; CSE: Clearfil SE Bond - Kuraray) in primary dentin. There is no statistical difference between groups. Fracture modes revealed a weak zone in the demineralized dentin (SMP) and in the hybrid layer (CSE). The interfacial morphology was similar in both groups. The demineralized zone in bond structures has a negative influence in adhesive restorations over the time.

1. Johnsen, D.C. Comparison of primary and permanent teeth. In: Avery, J.A. (Ed.). Oral development and histology. Philadelphia, B. C. Decker, p. 180-190, 1988.

2. Hirayama, A. Experimental analytical electron microscopic stud-ies on the quantitative analysis of elemental concentration in biological thin specimens and its application to dental science. Shikwa Gakuho, Tokyo 90: 1019-1036, 1990.

3. Sumikawa, D.A. et al. Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent 21: 439-444, 1999.

4. Nör, J.E. et al. Dentin bonding: SEM comparison of the resin-dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res 75: 1396-1403, 1996.

5. Olmez A, et al. Comparison of the resin-dentin interface in pri-mary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22: 293-298, 1998.

6. Hashimoto M, et al. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 79: 1385-1391, 2000.

7. Perdigao J. et al. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 3:141-6, 1997.

8. Tay F.R, et al. An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin. J Adhes Dent 2: 83-98, 2000.

9. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 75: 1706-15, 1996.

10. Hashimoto M, et al. Over-etching effects on micro-tensile bond strength and failure patterns for two dentin bonding systems. J Dent 30: 99-105, 2002.

11. Salama F.S, Tao L. Comparison of gluma bond strenght to pri-mary vs. permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 13: 163-166, 1991.

12. Bordin-Aykroyd S, Sefton J, Davies E.H. In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. Dent Mater 8: 74-78, 1992.

13. Jumlongras D,White G.E. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 21: 223-229, 1997.

14. El Kalla I.H, García-Godoy F. Bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of four adhesive systems in primary and per-manent molars. J Dent Child 65: 169-176, 1998.

15. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 8: 125-130, 1992.

16. Agostini F.G, Kaaden C, Powers J.M. Bond strength of self-etch-ing primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 23: 481-486, 2001.

17. Telles P.D.S, Machado M.A.A.M, Nör, J.E. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in pri-mary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 23: 315-320, 2001.

18. Hashimoto M, et al. Resin-tooth adhesive interfaces after long-term function. Am J Dent 14: 211-215, 2001.

19. Yoshikawa T, et al. Effects of dentin depth and cavity configura-tion on bond strength. J Dent Res 78: 898-905, 1999.

20. Tay F.R, et al. Mechanical disruption of dentin collagen fibrils during resin-dentin bond testing. J Adhes Dent 2: 175-92, 2000.

21. Hashimoto M, et al. The effect of hybrid layer thickness on bond strength: demineralized dentin zone of the hybrid layer. Dent Mater 16: 406-411, 2000.

22. Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Arao, T. A tensile test to facilitate identification of defects in dentin bonded specimens. J Dent 26: 379- 385, 1998.

23. Nakabayashi N, Pashley D.H. Hybridization of the dental hard tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd, p. 65-67, 1998.