Article Data

  • Views 2057
  • Dowloads 147

Original Research

Open Access

Caries removal with Carisolv system: Criteria evaluation and microleakage test

  • Yoshishige Yamada1
  • Yuichi Kimura1
  • Mozammal Hossain1
  • Jun-ichro Kinoshita1
  • Yuko Shimizu1
  • Koukichi Matsumoto1

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.30.2.j3060x778773072r Vol.30,Issue 2,December 2005 pp.121-126

Published: 01 December 2005

*Corresponding Author(s): Yoshishige Yamada E-mail: yoshi@senzoku.shovva-u.ac.jp

Abstract

In the present study, cavities prepared by Carisolv were verified as being caries-free by two methods; by conventional visual and tactile criteria, and by DIAGNOdent. The results indicate that in the den-tal clinic, the efficiency of complete carious dentin removal with Carisolv is no longer difficult when a proper clinical guide is used. Furthermore, treatment of dentin surfaces with Carisolv is capable of decreasing marginal microleakage after composite resin restorations.

Keywords


Cite and Share

Yoshishige Yamada,Yuichi Kimura,Mozammal Hossain,Jun-ichro Kinoshita,Yuko Shimizu,Koukichi Matsumoto. Caries removal with Carisolv system: Criteria evaluation and microleakage test. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2005. 30(2);121-126.

References

1. Habib CM, Kronman J, Goldman, M. A chemical evaluation of collagen and hydroxyproline after treatment with GK-101 (N-chloroglycine). Pharmacol Ther Dent 2: 209–215,1975.

2. Schutzbank SG, Galaini J, Kronman JH, Goldman M, Clarke RE. A comparative in vitro study of effect of GK-101 and GK-101 E in caries removal. J Dent Res 57: 861–864, 1978.

3. Ericson D. In vitro efficacy of new gel for chemo-mechanical caries removal. J Dent Res 77: (abstr. 360) 1252, 1998.

4. Ericson D, Bornstein R, Götrick B, Raber H, Zimmerman M. Clinical multi-centre evaluation of a new method for chemome-chanical caries removal. Caries Res 32: (abstr. 119) 308, 1998.

5. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Götrick B, Bornstein R, Thorell J. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemomechanical removal of caries. A multi-centre study. Caries Res 33: 171–177, 1999.

6. Munshi AK, Hegde AM, Shetty PK. Clinical evaluation of Carisolv in the chemo-mechanical removal of carious dentine. J Clin Pediatr Dent 26: 49–54, 2001.

7. Nadanovsky P, Cohen Carneiro F, Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods. Caries Res 35: 384–389, 2001.

8. Rafique S, Fiske J, Banerjee A. Clinical trial of an airabration/ chemomechanical operative procedure for the restorative treatment of dental patients. Caries Res 37: 360–364, 2003.

9. Fure S, Linström P. Evaluation of the chemomechanical removal of dentine caries in vivo with a new modified Carisolv gel. Clin Oral Invest 8: 139–144, 2004.

10. Splieth C, Rosin M, Gellissen B. Determination of residual den-tine caries after conventional mechanical and chemomechanical caries removal with Carisolv. Clin Oral Invest 5: 250–253, 2001.

11. Lager A, Thronqvist E, Ericson D. Cultivable bacteria in dentine after caries excavation using rose-bur or Carisolv. Caries Res 37: 206–211, 2003.

12. Yazici AR, Atilla P, Ozgunaltay G, Muftuoglu S. In vitro compar-ison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conventional rotary instru-ment in caries removal. J Oral Rehabil 30: 1177–1182, 2003.

13. Shovelton DS. Studies of dentin and pulp in deep caries. Int Dent J 20: 283–296, 1970.

14. Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Beighton D. Operative and microbiolog-ical validation of visual, radiographic and electronic diagnosis of occlusal caries in non-cavitated teeth judged to be in need of operative care. Br Dent J 179; 214–220, 1995.

15. Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Tamaki Y, Yamada Y, Jayawardena JA, Matsumoto K. Dentinal composition and Knoop hardness mea-surements of cavity floor following carious dentin removal with Carisolv. Oper Dent 28: 346–351, 2003.

16. Lussi A, Hibst R, Paulus R. DIAGNOdent: an optical method for caries detection. J Dent Res 83:80–83, 2004.

17. Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Blomlöf J. Efficasy of Carisolv-assist-ed caries excavation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 19: 464–469, 1999.

18. Kushunoki M, Oikawa M, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H. SEM observation of the dentin staining with caries detector.J Dent Res 81: (abstr. 593) A-98, 2002.

19. Oikawa M, Kusunoki K, Itoh K, Hisamitsu H. The experimental caries detector containing polypropylenglycol. J Dent Res 83:(abstr. 757) A-, 2004.

20. Hossain M, Yamada Y, Nakamura Y, Murakami Y, Tamaki K, Matsumoto K. A study on surface roughness and microleakage test in cavities preparated by Er:YAG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities. Lasers Med Sci 18: 25–31, 2003.

21. Erick JD, Wilko RA, Anderson CH, Sorensen SE. Scanning elec-tron microscopy of cut tooth surfaces and identification of debris by use of the electron microprobe. J Dent Res 49: 1359–1368, 1970.

22. Smith DC. Buonocore memorial lecture: A milestone in den-tistry. Oper Dent 7: 14–25, 1982.

23. Cederlund A, Lindskog S, Blomlöf J. Effect of a chemo-mechan-ical caries removal system (Carisolv) on dentin topography of non-carious dentin. Acta Odontol Scand 57: 185–189, 1999.

24. Wennerberg A, Sawase T, Kultje C. The influence of Carisolv on enamel and dentine surface topography. Eur J Oral Sci 107: 297–306, 1999.

25. Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentin excavation. Caries Res 34: 144–150, 2000.

26. Dimaggio JJ, Hawes RR, Kiryati A. Histological evaluation of direct and indirect pulp capping. J Dent Res 42: (absrt 38), 1963.


Submission Turnaround Time

Top