Evaluation of fluoride release from teeth after topical application of NaF, SnF2 and APF and antimicrobial activity on mutans streptococci

The objectives of this study were to evaluate and compare the amount and pattern of fluoride release from teeth after topical application of 2% NaF, 8% SnF2 and 1.23% APF at different time intervals. The growth inhibitory effects of this released fluoride ion was assessed on mutans streptococci (MS) and correlated with the fluoride release. Forty premolars divided into four groups were subjected to different topical fluoride treatments. All the teeth were immersed individually in deionized water and were transferred to containers at 1 hour, 1 day and 1 week time intervals. 240 samples in total were used for fluoride estimation by ion selective electrode method and the samples from the other sub-group were used for evaluation of antimicrobial activity on mutans streptococci (MS) by bacterial inhibition assay method. The results showed that the highest fluoride release (7.83±0.55ppm) was seen in SnF2 treated specimens, as compared to that of NaF (3.71±0.60ppm ) and APF (3.30±0.51ppm), the difference being statistically significant (P<0.01).This was observed immediately after 1 hour, followed by a drastic reduction thereafter. No zones of inhibition were observed at the released fluoride con-centrations at different time intervals in the different groups. In conclusion: 8% SnF2 is expected to have greater anticaries property from the high fluoride releasing property for prolonged period of time.

1. Shashikiran ND, Subba Reddy VV, Patil R. Minimal Intervention: Part I. A review of new concept in caries manage-ment. J Internat College Dent 50: 15–21, 2004.

2. ten Cate JM, van Loveren C. Fluoride mechanisms. Dent Clin N Am 43: 713–742, 1999.

3. Featherstone JDB. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: Role of low level of fluoride. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 27: 31–40, 1999.

4. Toumba KJ. Slow-release devices for fluoride delivery to high-risk individuals. Caries Res 35(Suppl 1): 10–13, 2001.

5. Sjogren K. How to improve oral fluoride retention? Caries Res 35 (Suppl 1): 14–17, 2001.

6. van Loveren C. Antimicrobial activity of fluoride and its in vivo importance: Identification of research questions. Caries Res 35(Suppl 1): 65–70, 2001.

7. Hellwig E, Lennon AM. Systemic versus topical fluoride. Caries Res 38: 258–262, 2004.

8. Fejerskov O, Ekstrand J, Burt BA. Fluoride in dentistry. 2nd ed. Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 1996.

9. Yap AUJ, Khor E, Foo SH. Fluoride release and antibacterial properties of new generation tooth-colored restoratives. Operative Dent 24: 297–305, 1999.

10. Ogaard B. CaF2 formation: Cariostatic properties and factors of enhancing the effect. Caries Res 35 (Suppl 1) : 40–44, 2001.

11. Johnston DW. Current status of professionally applied topical fluorides. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 22: 159–163, 1994.

12. Skartveit L, Gjerdet NR, Selvig KA. Release of fluoride and metal ions from root surfaces after topical application of TiF4, SnF2 and NaF in vitro. Acta Odont Scand 49: 127–131, 1991.

13. Bowden GHW. Effects of fluoride on microbial ecology of den-tal plaque. J Dent Res 69 (Spec Iss): 653–659,1990.

14. Foley J, Blackwell A. Ion release from copper phosphate cement and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth in vitro: A com-parative study. Caries Res 37: 416–424, 2003.

15. Steven A, Fischman, Tinanoff N. The effect of acid and fluoride release on the antimicrobial properties of four glass ionomer cements. Pediatr Dent 16: 368–370, 1994.

16. Barkhordar RA, Kempler D, Pelzner RRB, Stark MM. Technical note: Antimicrobial action of glass-ionomer lining cement on S. sanguis and S. mutans. Dent Mat 5: 281–282, 1989.