Article Data

  • Views 739
  • Dowloads 158

Original Research

Open Access

Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the effect of etching agents on human enamel surface

  • Caio G. Zanet1
  • Victor E. Arana-Chavez2,*,
  • Marcelo Fava3

1,Post Graduate student

2Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo

3Department of Preventive and Social Dentistry, School of Dentistry of São José dos Campos, UNESP

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.30.3.x5q47j208g064366 Vol.30,Issue 3,May 2006 pp.247-250

Published: 01 May 2006

*Corresponding Author(s): Victor E. Arana-Chavez E-mail: vearana@usp.br

Abstract

Acid etching promotes microporosities on enamel surface, which provide a better bonding surface to adhesive materials. The purpose of this study was to comparatively analyze the microstructure of enamel surface after etching with 37% phosphoric acid or with two self-etching primers, Non-rinse conditioner (NRC) and Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB) using scanning electron microscopy. Thirty sound premolars were divided into 3 groups with ten teeth each: Group 1: the buccal surface was etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds; Group 2: the buccal surface was etched with NRC for 20 sec-onds; Group 3: the buccal surface was etched with CSEB for 20 seconds. Teeth from Group 1 were rinsed with water; teeth from all groups were air-dried for 15 seconds. After that, all specimens were processed for scanning electron microscopy and analyzed in a Jeol 6100 SEM. The results showed deeper etching when the enamel surface was etched with 37% phosphoric acid, followed by NRC and CSEB. It is concluded that 37% phosphoric acid is still the best agent for a most effective enamel etch-ing.

Cite and Share

Caio G. Zanet,Victor E. Arana-Chavez,Marcelo Fava. Scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the effect of etching agents on human enamel surface. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2006. 30(3);247-250.

References

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34:849–53, 1955.

2. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 131:20–5, 2000.

3. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of Dental Hard Tissues. Quintessence Publishing Co Ltd., Tokyo, 1998

4. Swift Junior EJ, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int 26:95–110, 1995.

5. Silverstone LM. Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy. Caries Res 9:373–87, 1975.

6. Gwinnett AJ. Histologic changes in human enamel following treatment with acidic adhesive conditioning agents. Arch Oral Biol 16: 731–8, 1971.

7. Miyazaki M, Hirohata N, Takagaki K, Onose H, Moore, BK. Influence of self-etching primer drying time on enamel bond strength of resin composites. J Dent 27:203–7, 1999.

8. VanMeerbeek B, De Munk J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memo-rial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28:215–31, 2003.

9. Kanca III J. A method for bonding to tooth structure using phos-phoric acid as a dentin-enamel conditioner. Quintessence Int 22:285–90,1991.

10. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. Effect of enamel pretreatments on bond strength of compomer. Dent Mater 17:402–8, 2001.

11. Toledano M, Osorio R, De Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA. Influence of self-etching primer primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 14:205–10, 2001.

12. Arana-Chavez VE, Massa LF. Odontoblasts: the cells forming and maintaining dentine. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 46:1367–1373, 2004.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top