Article Data

  • Views 3086
  • Dowloads 382

Original Research

Open Access

Free-end Space Maintainers: Design, Utilization and Advantages

  • Elena Barbería1,*,
  • Tania Lucavechi2
  • Dora Cárdenas3
  • Myriam Maroto4

1,Program for Integral Odontological Treatment of Pediatric Patients. Director of the Master in Pediatric Dentistry

2,Master in Pediatric Dentistry. Assistant Doctor on the Program for Integral Odontological Treatment of Pediatric Patients

3,Master in Pediatric Dentistry

4,Program for Integral Odontological Treatment of Pediatric Patients. Postgraduate in Master in Pediatric Dentistry

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.1.p87112173240x80m Vol.31,Issue 1,September 2006 pp.5-8

Published: 01 September 2006

*Corresponding Author(s): Elena Barbería E-mail: barberia@odon.ucm.es

Abstract

Primary molars are a determining factor in the development of occlusion. Given their importance, when restorative treatment is not feasible and a primary molar must be extracted, the practitioner should keep in mind the risk of losing space, and the consequent malocclusion. Preservation of the space can eliminate or reduce the need for prolonged orthodontic treatment. For that reason, there are various kinds of space maintainers and the pediatric dentist must decide which one to utilize, on the basis of general and local factors related to the child. In the selection of a treatment option for space maintenance, the greatest complications occur when the first permanent molar has not yet erupted. A large variety of appliances have been devised to deal with this situation. This article proposes the use of a removable space maintainer that is open on one end and can be employed to guide the first permanent molar, maintaining the integrity of the mucous membrane and serving as a prosthetic appliance, preventing the complications and contraindications often caused by sub-gingival maintainers.

Keywords

space maintainers; alterations in eruption; eruption control; free-end space maintainer

Cite and Share

Elena Barbería,Tania Lucavechi,Dora Cárdenas,Myriam Maroto. Free-end Space Maintainers: Design, Utilization and Advantages. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2006. 31(1);5-8.

References

1. Moss S. The relationship between diet, saliva and baby bottle tooth decay. Int Dent J. 46:399-402. 1996

2. Chosack A, Eidelman E. Rehabilitation of a fractured incisal using the patient’s natural crown- Case report. J Dent Child. 31:19-21. 1964

3. Simonsen RJ. Restoration of a fractured central incisor using original tooth fragment. J Am Dent Assoc. 105:646-48. 1982

4. Liebenberg WH. Reattachment of coronal fragments: operative considerations for the repair of anterior teeth. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 9:761-72. 1997

5. Baratieri LN, Monteiro Jr S, Andrada MAC. The “sandwich” technique as a base for reattachment of dental fragments. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:81-85.

6. Moscovich H, Creugers NHJ. The novel use of extracted teeth as a dental restorative material: the natural inlay. J Dent. 26:21-24, 1998.

7. Santos JFF, Bianch JR. Restoration of severely damaged teeth with resin bonding systems: a case report. Quintessence Int. 22:611-615, 1991.

8. Busato ALS, Loguercio AD, Barbosa AN, Sanseverino MCS, Macedo RP, Baldissera RA. Biological restorations using tooth fragments. Am J Dent. 11:46-49. 1998

9. Ramires-Romito ACD,Wanderley MT, Oliveira MDM, Imparato JCP, Corrêa MSNP. Biologic restoration of primary anterior teeth. Quintessence Int. 31: 405-411. 2000

10. Bussadori SK, Rego MA, Pereira RJ, Guedes-Pinto AC. Human enamel veneer in a deciduous tooth: clinical case. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 27:111-16. 2003

11. Cardoso AC, Arcari GM, Zendron MV, Magini KS. The use of natural teeth to make removable partial prosthesis and complete prosthesis: case report. Quintessence Int. 25:239-243. 1994

12. Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth. Pediatric Dent. 24:511-16. 2002


Submission Turnaround Time

Top