Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Clinical Evaluation of FUJI VII Sealant Material
1Dept. of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Mcods, Manipal
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.1.w8532743883hw64n Vol.31,Issue 1,September 2006 pp.52-57
Published: 01 September 2006
*Corresponding Author(s): Ganesh M E-mail: drmganesh@yahoo.com contactmnm@gmail.com
200 children of the age groups of 3-5 years and 6-7 years were selected for sealant application, each consisting of 100 children. The clinical retention of Fuji VII was tested in both primary and permanent molar teeth at time intervals of 6 months, 12 months and 24 months follow-up and compared with a resin based sealant, Concise. Results demonstrated that there was no difference in the performance of the materials in primary and permanent teeth.
sealant, pits & fissure, retention
Ganesh M,Shobha Tandon. Clinical Evaluation of FUJI VII Sealant Material. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2006. 31(1);52-57.
1. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc. 122(10):34-42. 1991
2. Hardison JR, Collier DR, Sprouse LW, Van Cleave ML, Hogan AD. Retention of pit and fissure sealant on the primary molars of 3- and 4-year-old children after 1 year. J Am Dent Assoc.114 (5): 613-5. 1987
3. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Fairhurst CW, Williams JE, Della-Giustina VE, Brooks JD.A comparative clinical study of two pit and fissure sealants: six-year results in Augusta, Ga. J Am Dent Assoc.105 (2):237-9 1982
4. Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 29:298-301. 2001
5. Mejare I, Mjor IA.: Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study. Scand J Dent Res. 98 :345-50. 1990
6. Straffon LH, Dennison JB, More FG. Three-year evaluation of sealant: effect of isolation on efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc. 110(5):714-7. 1985
7. Rock WP, Bradnock G. Effect of operator variability and patient age on the retention of fissure sealant resin: 3-year results. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 9(5):207-9, 1981
8. Powell PB, Johnston JD, Hembree JH, McKnight J. Microleakage around a pit and fissure sealant.ASDC J Dent Child. 44(4):298-301. 1977
9. Simonsen RJ. The clinical effectiveness of a colored pit and fissure sealant at 36 months.J Am Dent Assoc.; 102(3):323-7. 1981
10. Williams B, Winter GB. Fissure sealants - 2 years clinical study. Br Dent J. 6; 141(1):15-8 . 1976
11. Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppi L. Comparison of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealant-A two year clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 22:21-24, 1994
12. Brooks JD, Azhdari S, Ashrafi MH.A comparative study of three tinted, unfilled pit and fissure sealants. Eleven-month results in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Clin Prev Dent.;7(1):4-10. 1985
13. Carlos JP, Collier DR, Dennison JB, Field JF,Gwinnett AJ, Schulman A, Silverstone LM, Tonn EM,Walton JH. Pit and fissure sealant use: an issue explored. J Am Dent Assoc. 108(3):310-22. 1984
14. Forss H, Halme E. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 26(1):21-5. 1998
Top