Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 688
  • Dowloads 146

Original Research

Open Access

Clinical Evaluation of FUJI VII Sealant Material

  • Ganesh M1,*,
  • Shobha Tandon1

1Dept. of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Mcods, Manipal

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.1.w8532743883hw64n Vol.31,Issue 1,January 2007 pp.52-57

Published: 01 January 2007

*Corresponding Author(s): Ganesh M E-mail: drmganesh@yahoo.com contactmnm@gmail.com

PDF (221.96 kB) View Full-text

Abstract

200 children of the age groups of 3-5 years and 6-7 years were selected for sealant application, each consisting of 100 children. The clinical retention of Fuji VII was tested in both primary and permanent molar teeth at time intervals of 6 months, 12 months and 24 months follow-up and compared with a resin based sealant, Concise. Results demonstrated that there was no difference in the performance of the materials in primary and permanent teeth.

Keywords

sealant, pits & fissure, retention

Cite and Share

Ganesh M,Shobha Tandon. Clinical Evaluation of FUJI VII Sealant Material. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2007. 31(1);52-57.

URL:

https://www.jocpd.com/articles/10.17796/jcpd.31.1.w8532743883hw64n

References

1. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealant after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc. 122(10):34-42. 1991

2. Hardison JR, Collier DR, Sprouse LW, Van Cleave ML, Hogan AD. Retention of pit and fissure sealant on the primary molars of 3- and 4-year-old children after 1 year. J Am Dent Assoc.114 (5): 613-5. 1987

3. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Fairhurst CW, Williams JE, Della-Giustina VE, Brooks JD.A comparative clinical study of two pit and fissure sealants: six-year results in Augusta, Ga. J Am Dent Assoc.105 (2):237-9 1982

4. Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N. A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 29:298-301. 2001

5. Mejare I, Mjor IA.: Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study. Scand J Dent Res. 98 :345-50. 1990

6. Straffon LH, Dennison JB, More FG. Three-year evaluation of sealant: effect of isolation on efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc. 110(5):714-7. 1985

7. Rock WP, Bradnock G. Effect of operator variability and patient age on the retention of fissure sealant resin: 3-year results. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 9(5):207-9, 1981

8. Powell PB, Johnston JD, Hembree JH, McKnight J. Microleakage around a pit and fissure sealant.ASDC J Dent Child. 44(4):298-301. 1977

9. Simonsen RJ. The clinical effectiveness of a colored pit and fissure sealant at 36 months.J Am Dent Assoc.; 102(3):323-7. 1981

10. Williams B, Winter GB. Fissure sealants - 2 years clinical study. Br Dent J. 6; 141(1):15-8 . 1976

11. Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppi L. Comparison of glass ionomer and resin based fissure sealant-A two year clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 22:21-24, 1994

12. Brooks JD, Azhdari S, Ashrafi MH.A comparative study of three tinted, unfilled pit and fissure sealants. Eleven-month results in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Clin Prev Dent.;7(1):4-10. 1985

13. Carlos JP, Collier DR, Dennison JB, Field JF,Gwinnett AJ, Schulman A, Silverstone LM, Tonn EM,Walton JH. Pit and fissure sealant use: an issue explored. J Am Dent Assoc. 108(3):310-22. 1984

14. Forss H, Halme E. Retention of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant and effect on carious outcome after 7 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 26(1):21-5. 1998

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top