Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 661
  • Dowloads 153

Original Research

Open Access

A Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars Restored with Various Restorative

  • Sidhi Passi1
  • I.K. Pandit1
  • Nikhil Srivastava1
  • Neeraj Gugnani1
  • Monika Gupta1

1Dept of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, D.A.V. (C) Dental College & Hospital

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.3.dq1w71t160134697 Vol.31,Issue 3,May 2007 pp.164-166

Published: 01 May 2007

PDF (227.13 kB) View Full-text

Abstract

Sixty extracted primary molars were used in the study. After pulpotomy, these were divided into four groups on the basis of restorative materials to be used. Results showed that the Ormocer had the maximum fracture strength while the pos-terior Glass Ionomer Cement showed the least fracture strength among the various restorative materials used in the study

Keywords

Pulpotomy, restoration, ormocer, glass ionomer

Cite and Share

Sidhi Passi,I.K. Pandit,Nikhil Srivastava,Neeraj Gugnani,Monika Gupta. A Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Strength of Pulpotomized Primary Molars Restored with Various Restorative. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2007. 31(3);164-166.

URL:

https://www.jocpd.com/articles/10.17796/jcpd.31.3.dq1w71t160134697

References

1. Anusavice KJ. Phillip’s science of dental materials. 11th edition. 2003. Saunder’s; 49-74.

2. Castro A, Feigal RF. Microleakage of new improved Glass Ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth. Pediat Dent. 24:23-28, 2002.

3. Castro AKP. Thermal and mechanical load cycling on microleakage and shear bond strength to the dentin. J Oper Dent 29 (1) : 42-48, 2004.

4. Cohen Stephen, Burns C Richard. Pathways of the pulp. 8th edition, 2002, Mosby Publications; 685-718.

5. Cotert H.S. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistance of posteri or teeth restored with various adhesive restorations. Int J Prosthodont 14 (4):374-378, 2001.

6. Davina A.B. A conservative approach to the primary teeth. J. Clinic Ped Dent Winter 22 : 103 -105, 1998

7. Elkins CJ, McCourt JW. Bond strength of dentinal adhesives in primary teeth. Quintessence Int. 24: 271 - 273, 1993.

8. Gale MS, Darwell B. Thermal cycling procedures for the laboratory testing of dental restoration. J Dentistry 27:89-99, 1999.

9. Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH. Comparison of atraumatic resto-rative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Quintessence Int. 34(1):31-37, 2003.

10. Gorucu J, Ozgunaltay G. Fracture resistance of Class II bonded Amalgam and new tooth colored materials. J Oper Dent 28 (5):501-507, 2003.

11. Gotti G, Goracci C, Godoy FG, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the bonding mechanism of an adhesive material to primary teeth. J Dent Child. 71: 54 - 60, 2004.

12. Hurmuzlu F, Kirenitci A, Altundasa E, Hergumer S. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with Ormocer and Packable Composites. J Endodontics 29(12):838 - 840, 2003.

13. El-Kalla IH, Garcia-Godoy F Fracture strength of Adhesively Restored pulpotomized Primary Molars. J Dent Child 66 : 238 - 242, July - Aug 1999.

14. Ingle JJ, Bakland LK. A textbook of Endodontics. Fifth Edition 2002. Mosby Publications; 861-902.

15. Kevin James Donly. Cuspal reinforcement in Primary teeth: an invitro comparison of the restorative materials. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry10 (2):103-104, 1988.

16. Kilpatrick NM. Durability of Restorations in primary molars. J Dent 21:67-73, 1993.

17. Guelmann M, Kelsey LB, Villata P,Garcia Godoy F. Microleakage of Restorative Techniques for pulpotomized primary Molars. J Dent Child 71 (3): 209 -211, 2004.

18. Mc Donald RE, Avery DR. Dentistry for the Child and Adolescent. 8th Edition, 2004. Mosby Publications; 390 - 412.

19. Miyazaki M, Iwasaka K, Soyamura T, Onose H, Moore BK. Resin modified glass ionomers : Dentin Bond strength versus time. Oper Dent 23: 144 -144, 1998.

20. Product Information Guide : Admira bond / Admira; Voco, Germany.

21. Product Information Guide: Beautiful, Shofu, Japan.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top