Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 1084
- Dowloads 154
Original Research
Open AccessChemical Versus Conventional Caries Removal Techniques in Primary Teeth: A Microhardness Study
Chemical Versus Conventional Caries Removal Techniques in Primary Teeth: A Microhardness Study
- Fernanda Nahás Pires Corrêa1,*,
- Rachel de Oliveira Rocha2
- Leonardo Eloy Rodrigues Filho3
- Antônio Muench3
- Célia Regina Martins Delgado Rodrigues4
1Pediatric Dentistry-University of São Paulo, Doctorate Student in Pediatric Dentistry-University of São Paulo
2,Stomatology Department of UFSM
3Dental Materials Department, University of São Paulo
4,Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry Department at the University of São Paulo
*Corresponding Author(s): Fernanda Nahás Pires Corrêa E-mail: fenahas@usp.br
Abstract
The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the remaining dentinal surface after carious tooth tissue removal with a low speed conventional bur and two chemomechanical methods, (PapacárieTM and Carisolv®), using the microhardness test. It was concluded that the hardness of the remaining dentin after carious tissue removal was lower than that obtained on healthy dentin, without significance between the different means of carious tissue removal (p<0.05).
Keywords
carisolv, papacarie, primary teeth, tooth microhardness, caries
Cite and Share
Fernanda Nahás Pires Corrêa,Rachel de Oliveira Rocha,Leonardo Eloy Rodrigues Filho,Antônio Muench,Célia Regina Martins Delgado Rodrigues. Chemical Versus Conventional Caries Removal Techniques in Primary Teeth: A Microhardness Study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2007. 31(3);187-192.
References
1. Beeley JA, Yip HK & Stevenson AG. Chemomechanical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments. British Dental Journal 188(8):427-430, 2000
2. Fusayama T. Two layers of carious dentin;diagnosis and treatment Operative Dentistry22(3): 401-411, 1979
3. Ogushi K ¨& Fusayama T. Electron microscopic structure of the two layers of carious dentine Journal of Dental Research54(5):1019-1026, 1975
4. Banerjee A, Kidd EAM & Watson TF. In vitro evaluation of five alter native methods of carious dentine excavation. Caries Research
34(2):144-150, 2000
5. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvao AC. Papain gel: a new chemo-mechanical caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent: 30(2):115-9, 2005
6. Munshi AK, Hedge AM & Shetty PK. Clinical evaluation of Carisolv in the chemico-mechanical removal of carious dentin Journal Clinical of Pediatric Dentistry 26(1): 49-54, 2001
7. Nadanovsky P, Carneiro FC & Mello FS. Removal of carious using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods Caries Research 35(5):384-389, 2001
8. Kakaboura A, Masouras C, Staikou O & Vougiouklakis G. A compara-tive clinical study on the Carisolv caries removal method Quintessence International 34(4):269-271, 2003
9. Maragakis GM, Hahn P& Hellwing E. Clinical evaluation of chemome-chanical caries removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients Caries Research: 35(3):205-210, 2001.
10. Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Tamaki Y, Yamada Y, Jayawardena JA & Matsumoto K. Dentinal composition and Knoop hardness measure-ments of cavity floor following carious dentin removal with Carisolv Operative Dentistry: 28(4): 346-351, 2003
11. Fluckiger L, Waltimo T, Stich H & Lussi A. Comparison of chemome-chanical caries removal using Carisolv or conventional hand excavation in deciduous teeth in vitro Journal of Dentistry 33(2): 87-90, 2005
12. Fure S, Lingstrom P & Birkhed D. Evaluation of Carisolv for the chemomechanical removal of primary root caries in vivo Caries Research 34(3):275-280, 2000.
13. Yazici AR, Atilia P, Ozgunaltay G & Muftuoglu S. In vitro comparison of the efficacy of Carisolv and conventional rotary instrumental in caries removal Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 30(12):1177-1182, 2003
14. Chaussain-Miller C, Decup F, Domejean-Oliaguet S, Gillet D, Guigand M & Kaleka R. Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site stage concept, a revised caries classification system Clinical Oral Investigation 7(1) 32-37, 2003
15. Candido LC (2004) Web site evolution; Retrivied online November 23, 2004 from: http:www.feridologo.com.br/curpapaina.htm
16. Feagin F, Patel PR, Koulourides T & Pigman W. Study of the effect of calcium, phosphate, fluoride and hydrogen ion concentrations on the remineralization of partially demineralized human and bovine enamel surfaces Archieves of Oral Biology 16(5) 535-548, 1971
17. Koulorides T & Housch T. Hardness testing and microradiography of enamel in relation to intraoral de-and remineralization. In: Leach AS & Edgar WM. Demineralization and remineralization of the teeth. Oxford: IRL Press 255-72, 1983
18. Rafique S, Fiske J & Banerjee A. Clinical trial of an air-abrasion chemo mechanical operative procedure for the restorative treatment of dental patients Caries Research 37(5): 360-364, 2003
19. Cederlund A, Seven L & Blomlof J. Effect of a chemomechanical caries removal system (Carisolv) on dentin topography of non-carious dentin Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 57(4):185-189, 1999
20. Haak R, Wicht MJ & Noack MJ. Does chemomechanical caries removal affects dentine adhesion? European Journal of Oral Science 108(5): 449-455, 2000
21. Splieth C, Rosin M & Gellisen B. Determination of residual dentine caries after conventional mechanical and chemomechanical caries removal with Carisolv Clinical Oral Investigation 5(4): 250-253, 2001
22. Fejerskov O. Concepts on dental caries and their consequences for understanding the disease Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 25(1): 5-12, 1997
23. Sonju Clasen AB, Ofaard B, Duschner H, Ruben J, Arends J & Sonju T. Caries development in fluoridated and non-fluoridated deciduous and permanent enamel in situ examined by microradiography and confocal laser scanning microscopy Advances in Dental Research 11(4): 442-447, 1997
24. Johnsen DC, Schechner TG & Gerstenmaiter JH. Proportional changes in caries patterns from early to primary dentition Journal of Public Health 47(1): 5-9, 1987
25. Banerjee A, Sheriff M, Kidd EA & Watson TF. A confocal microscop-ic study relating the autofluorescence of carious dentine to its micro hardness British Dental Journal 187(4): 206-210, 1999
26. Hosoya Y, Marshall SJ, Watanabe LG & Marshall GW. Microhardness of carious deciduous dentin Operative Dentistry 25(2): 81-89, 2000
27. Iost HI, Costa JH, Rodrigues HH, Rocca RA. Dureza e contaminação bacteriana da dentina após remoção da lesão de cárie Revista ABO Nacional 3(1): 25-29, 1995
28. Marshall GW Jr, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH & Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding Journal of Dentistry 25(6): 441-458, 1997
29. Craig RG, Gehring PE & Peyton FA. Relation of structure to the micro hardness of human dentin Journal of Dental Research 38(3): 624-630, 1959
30. Hosoya Y, Ono T, Grayson W & Marshall Jr. Microhardness of carious primary canine dentin Pediatric Dental Journal 12(1): 91-98, 2002.
31. Santiago BM, Ventin DA, Primo LG & Barcelos R. Microhardness of dentin underlying ART restorations in primary molars: an in vivo pilot study British Dental Journal 2(23): 103-106, 2005.
32. Tonami K,Araki K, Mataki S & Kurosaki N. Effects of chloramines and sodium hypochlorite on carious dentin Journal of Medical Dental Science 50(2): 139-146, 2003
33. Hara AT, Turssi CP, Serra MC & Nogueira MCS. Extent of the carios-tatic effect on root dentin provided by fluoride containing restorative materials Operative Dentistry 27(5):480-7, 2002
34. Craig RG & Peyton FA. The microhardenss of enamel and dentin Journal of Dental Research 37(4):661-668, 1958
35. Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M & Kilpatrick N. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: an ultra-micro-indentation study Journal of Dentistry 28(8):589-594, 2000.
36. Hegdahl T & Hagebo T . The load dependence in micro indentation hardness testing of enamel and dentin Scandinavia Journal of Dental Research 80: 449-452, 1972
37. Zárater- Pereira P. Estudo in situ sobre a ação da própolis de Apis melif-era no desenvolvimento da cárie dentária e na formação do biofilme dental [Doctorate Thesis]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Odontologia da USP; 2003.
38. Rocha RO, Corrêa FNPC & Rodrigues CRMD.Microdureza superficial e transversal do esmalte de dentes decíduos Brazilian Oral Research 18 Abstract # PC148 p-221, 2004
39. Fusayama T, Okuse K & Hosada. H Relationship between discoloration and microbial invasion in carious dentin Journal of Dentistry
45(4):1033-1046, 1966
40. Kidd EAM, Joyston- Bechal S, Beighton D.The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation: a microbiological assessment British Dental Journal 174 (7):245-248, 1993
41. Goldman M & Kronam JH. A preliminary report on a chemomechani-cal menas of removing caries Journal of American Dental Association 93(6):1149-1153, 1976
42. Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Morkys K, Kaup M & Ott KHR. Reaction of sound and demineralized dentine to Carisolv in vivo and in vitro Journal of Dentistry 30(1):50-65, 2002.
43. Fosse G, Saele PK & Eibe R. Numerical density and distributional pat-tern of dentine tubules Acta Odontologica Scandinavcia 50(7) 201-210, 1992
44. Pashley D, Okabe A, Parham P. The relationship between dentin micro hardness and tubule density Endodontic Dental Traumatology 1(5):176-179, 1985
45. Lakomaa E & Rytomaa I. Mineral composition of enamel and dentin of primary and permanent teeth in Finland Scandinavica Journal of Dental Research 85(2):89-95, 1977
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top