Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Various Root Canal Filling Materials Used in Primary Teeth: A Microbiological Study

The primary goal of endodontic treatment in primary teeth is to eliminate infection, and to retain the tooth in a functional state until their normal exfoliation time without endangering the permanent dentition or the general health of the child. The complexity of the pulp canal system in primary teeth presents a discerning problem for chemo-mechanical preparation. One of the factors determining the success of endodontic treatment in infected primary teeth is the sealing material that should encompass among other factors a potent bactericidal effect and the capacity to resorb along with the roots of primary teeth.

This study evaluated the antimicrobial effectiveness of 5 root canal filling materials and a negative control agent against 23 strains of bacteria isolated from infected root canals of primary molar teeth and 3 non standard bacterial strains using agar diffusion assay. The materials were Zinc oxide and Eugenol (ZOE), Zinc oxide-Eugenol and Formocresol (ZOE+FC), Calcium hydroxide and sterile water (CAOH+H2O), Zinc oxide and Camphorated phenol (ZO+CP), Calcium hydroxide and Iodoform (Metapex) and Vaseline (Control).

All the materials except Vaseline showed varied antimicrobial activity against the test bacteria. The zones of inhibition were ranked into 4 inhibition categories based on the proportional distribution of the data. All the 26 bacterial isolates were classified under 4 groups based on Aerobic/Anaerobic and Gram positive/Gram negative. Statistical analysis was carried out to compare the antimicrobial effectiveness between materials tested with each of the bacterial groupings. ZOE+FC produced strong inhibition against most bacteria when compared to ZOE, ZO+CP and CAOH+H2O. Metapex and Vaseline were found to be non inhibitory

antimicrobial, root canal, primary teeth, zinc oxide, calcium hydroxide, Camphorated phenol, Calcium hydroxide, Iodoform

1. Cox S.T., Hembree J.H and Mc Knight J.P. The bactericidal potential of various endodontic materials for primary teeth. Oral Surg 45: 947-954, 1978.

2. Tomie-Karovie K. and Jelinek E. Comparative study of the bacterial flora in the surroundings, the root canals and sockets of deciduous molars. Int Dent J 21: 375-388, 1971.

3. Edwards S. and Nord C.E. Identification and characterization of microorganisms isolated from infected primary teeth. J Int Assoc Dent Child 3: 15-18, 1972.

4. Tronstad L. Recent development in Endodontic Research. Scand J of Dent Res 16: 161-171, 1985.

5. Grossman L.I. Antimicrobial effect of root canal cements. J of Endod 6: 594-597, 1980.

6. Goerig A.C. and Camp J.H. Root canal treatment in primary teeth: A review. Pediat Dent 5: 33-37, 1983.

7. Tchaou W.S., Turng B.F., Minah G.E and Coll J.A. Invitro inhibition of bacteria from root canals of primary teeth by various dental materials. Pediat Dent 17: 351-355, 1995.

8. Moller A.J. R. Microbiological examination of the root canals and peri apical tissues of human teeth. Methodological studies. Odontol Tidskr 74: 380, 1966.

9. Bauer A.W., Kirby W., Sherris J.C and Turch M. Antibiotic susceptibil-ity testing by standardized single disc method. Amer J of Clinc Pathol 45: 493, 1966.

10. Hibbard E.D. and Ireland R.L. Morphology of the root canals of the pri mary molar teeth. J Dent Child 24: 250-257, 1957.

11. Coll J.A., Josell S. and Casper J.S. Evaluation of a one appointment formocresol pulpectomy technique for primary molars. Pediat Dent 7: 123-129, 1985.

12. Holan G. and Fuks A.B. A comparison of pulpectomies using zinc oxide eugenol and KRI paste in primary molars: A retrospective study. Pediat Dent 15: 403-407, 1993.

13. Broisman H., Van Houle J., Gron P. and Krakow A.A. Antimicrobial effects of N2 invitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 45: 116-122, 1978.

14. Pupo J., Biral R.R., Benatti O., Abe A. and Valdrighi L. Antimicrobial effects of endodontic filling materials on microorganisms from root canal. Oral Surg 74: 216-220, 1992.

15. Rahmat A.B. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of 10 root canal seal-ers on Streptococcus sangius and Streptococcus mutans. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 68: 770-772, 1989.

16. Canalda C. and Pumarola J. Bacterial growth inhibition produced by root canal sealer cements with a calcium hydroxide base. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 68: 99-102, 1989.

17. Pumarola J., Esteban B. and Canalda C. Antimicrobial activity of 7 root canal sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 74: 216-220, 1992.

18. Thomas P.A., Bhatt K.S. and Kotian K.M. Antibacterial properties of dilute formocresol, eugenol and propylene glycol. Oral surg 49: 166-170, 1980.

19. Seow W.K. The effects of dyadic combinations of endodontic medica-ments on microbial growth inhibition. Pediat Dent 12: 292-297, 1990.

20. Stuart K.G., Miller C.H., Brown C.E. and Newton C.W. The compara-tive antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 72: 101-104, 1991.

21. Tchaou W.S., Turng B.F., Minah G.E. and Coll J.A. Inhibition of pure cultures of oral bacteria by root canal filling materials. Pediat Dent 18:444-449, 1996.

22. Armstrong R.L. Comparison of Dycal and Formocresol pulpotomies in young permanent teeth in monkeys. Oral Surg 49: 160, 1979.

23. Fuks A.B. and Bimstein E. Clinical evaluation of diluted formocresol pulpotomies in primary teeth of school children. Pediat Dent 3: 321, 1981.

24. Loss P.J., Straffon L.H. and Han S.S. Biological effects of formocresol. J Dent Child 36: 796-802, 1983.

25. Lazzari E.P., Ranly D.M. and Walker W.A. Biochemical effects of formocresol on bovine pulp tissue. Oral Surg 45: 796, 1978.

26. Block R.M. Systemic distribution of 14C labeled paraformaldehyde incorporated with formocresol following pulpotomies in dogs. J Endod 9: 176, 1983.

27. Myers D.R. Tissue changes induced by the absorption of formocresol from pulpotomy sites in dogs. Pediat Dent 5: 6, 1983.