Article Data

  • Views 655
  • Dowloads 160

Original Research

Open Access

Dimensional Changes in Dental Arches After Treatment with a Prefabricated Functional Appliance

  • Ramirez-Yañez G1,*,
  • Sidlauskas A2
  • Junior E3
  • Fluter J4

1Marquette University, School of Dentistry, Milwaukee,WI

2Faculty of Odontology, Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania

3Center for Muscular Dysfunction of the Face, University of ABO, Victoria, Brazil

4Private Practice, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.4.d7p31201572n72h2 Vol.31,Issue 4,July 2007 pp.279-283

Published: 01 July 2007

*Corresponding Author(s): Ramirez-Yañez G E-mail: german.ramirez@marquette.edu

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the T4K, a prefabricated functional appliance, on the transverse and anterior-height dimensions of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches. Dimensions before and after treatment were measured on the sample, then, natural growth was subtracted from the treatment effects and compared with twice the error of the method. A clinically significant increase of both dimensions was observed in the maxilla and mandible when Class II malocclusion patients were treated with the T4K. Therefore, this retrospective study demonstrates that T4K is a valid treatment choice at an early age when transverse expansion is part of the treatment goal.


Keywords

Dentofacial orthopedics, transverse expansion, functional appliance


Cite and Share

Ramirez-Yañez G,Sidlauskas A,Junior E,Fluter J. Dimensional Changes in Dental Arches After Treatment with a Prefabricated Functional Appliance. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2007. 31(4);279-283.

References

1. Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P. Mandibular changes dur-ing functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 104:153-161. 1993

2. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of ear-ly intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a ran-domized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 111:391-400. 1997

3. Tulloch JF, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dento-facial Orthop; 111:533-542. 1997

4. Toth LR, McNamara JA. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Frankel com-pared with and untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dento-facial Orthop; 116:597-609. 1999

5. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermark DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A. Treatment effects of the mandibular ante-rior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclu-sion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 123:286-295. 2003

6. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treat-ment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 113:62-72. 1998

7. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of funct-ional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. Am J Or-thod Dentofacial Orthop; 92:181-98. 1987

8. Defabianis P. TMJ internal derangement treatment in the grow-ing patient: effect of functional appliance therapy on condyle and fossa relocation. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 29:11-18. 2004

9. Rabie ABM, Ha U. Functional appliance therapy accelerates and enhances condylar growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or-thop; 123:40-48. 2003

10. Rabie AB, She TT, Harley VR. Forward mandibular positioning upregulates SOX9 and type II collagen expression in the glenoid fossa. J Dent Res; 82:725-30. 2003

11. Carels C, van Steenberghe D. Changes in neuromuscular reflexes in the masseter muscles during functional jaw orthopedic treatment in children. Am J Orthod Dento-facial Orthop; 90:410-19. 1986

12. Oudet C, Petrovic A, Garcia P. An experimental orthopedic treatment of the rat mandible using a functional appliance alters the fibre and myosin types in masticatory muscles. Reprod Nutr Dev; 28:795-803. 1988

13. Hiyama S, Ono PT, Ishiwata Y, Kuroda T, McNamara JA. Neu-romuscular and skeletal adaptations following man dibular for-ward positioning induced by Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod; 70:442-53. 2000

14. Singh GD, Clark WJ. Localization of mandibular changes in pa-tients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with Twin-block appliances: finite element scaling analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 119:419-25. 2001

15. Chen JY, Will LA, Niederman R. Analysis of efficacy of func-tional appliances on mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofa-cial Orthop; 122:470-476. 2002

16. Reed RT. Orthodontic research. Br Dent J; 24:168-231. 1990

17. Trenouth MJ, Mew JRC, Gibbs WW. Cephalometric evalu-ation of the Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with matched normative data. Am J Or-thod Dentofacial Orthop; 117:54-59. 2000

18. Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appli-ance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 95:138-47. 1989

19. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measure-ments: 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod; 60:111-27. 1971

20. Quadrelli C, Gheorgiu M, Marcheti C, Ghiglione V. Early myo-functional approach to skeletal Class II. Mondo Orthod; 2:109- 22. 2002

21. Usumez S, Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Karaman AI, Gu-ray E. The effects of early preorthodontic Trainer treatment on Class II, division 1 patients. Angle Orthod; 74:605-09, 2004

22. McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Frankel appliances in the treatment of Class II mal-occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 98:134-44. 1990

23. Firatli S, Ulgen M. The effects of the FR-3 appliance on the trans-versal dimension. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 110:55-60. 1996

24. Moorrees CF. The dentition of the growing child. A longitudi-nal study of dental development between 3 and 18 years of age. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1959.

25. Rabie ABM, Ha U. Functional appliance therapy accelerates and enhances condylar growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or-thop; 123:40-48. 2002

26. Adkins MD, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Arch perimeter changes on rapid palatal expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 97:194-99. 1990

27. Akkaya S, Lorenzon S, Ucem TT. Comparison of dental archand arch perimeter changes between bonded rapid and slowmaxil-lary expansion procedures. Eur J Orthod; 20: 255-61. 1998

28. Gafari J, Jacobson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Shofer FS, Laster LL. Changes of arch width in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 106:496-502. 1994

29. Kalogirou K, Ahlgren J, Klinge B. Effects of buccal shields on the maxillary dentoalveolar structures and the midpalatal suture: histologic and biometric studies in rabbits. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 109:521-30. 1996

30. Thuer U, Sieber R, Ingervall B. Cheek and tongue pressures in-the molar areas and the atmospheric pressure in the palatal vault in young adults. Eur J Orthod; 21:299-309. 1999

31. Lindner A, Hellsing E. Cheek and lip pressure against maxillary dental arch during dummy sucking. Eur J Orthod; 13;362-366. 1991

32. Haas AJ. Long-term postreatment evaluation of rapid palatal ex-pansion. Angle Orthod; 50;189-217. 1980

33. Fränkel R. Technik und Handhabung der Funktionsregler. Ber-lin: Verlag;14-16. 1975

34. Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, Komposch G. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions. Angle Orthod; 73; 674-85, 2003

35. Slaj M, Jezina MA, Lauc T, Rajic-Mestrovic S, Miksic M. Lon-gitudinal dental arch changes in the mixed dentition. Angle Or-thod; 73;509-14,. 2003

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

PubMed (MEDLINE) PubMed comprises more than 35 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top