Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Dimensional Changes in Dental Arches After Treatment with a Prefabricated Functional Appliance
1Marquette University, School of Dentistry, Milwaukee,WI
2Faculty of Odontology, Kaunas University of Medicine, Lithuania
3Center for Muscular Dysfunction of the Face, University of ABO, Victoria, Brazil
4Private Practice, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.4.d7p31201572n72h2 Vol.31,Issue 4,July 2007 pp.279-283
Published: 01 July 2007
*Corresponding Author(s): Ramirez-Yañez G E-mail: german.ramirez@marquette.edu
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the T4K, a prefabricated functional appliance, on the transverse and anterior-height dimensions of the maxillary and mandibular dental arches. Dimensions before and after treatment were measured on the sample, then, natural growth was subtracted from the treatment effects and compared with twice the error of the method. A clinically significant increase of both dimensions was observed in the maxilla and mandible when Class II malocclusion patients were treated with the T4K. Therefore, this retrospective study demonstrates that T4K is a valid treatment choice at an early age when transverse expansion is part of the treatment goal.
Dentofacial orthopedics, transverse expansion, functional appliance
Ramirez-Yañez G,Sidlauskas A,Junior E,Fluter J. Dimensional Changes in Dental Arches After Treatment with a Prefabricated Functional Appliance. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2007. 31(4);279-283.
1. Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P. Mandibular changes dur-ing functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 104:153-161. 1993
2. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of ear-ly intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a ran-domized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 111:391-400. 1997
3. Tulloch JF, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dento-facial Orthop; 111:533-542. 1997
4. Toth LR, McNamara JA. Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Frankel com-pared with and untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dento-facial Orthop; 116:597-609. 1999
5. Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermark DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A. Treatment effects of the mandibular ante-rior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclu-sion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 123:286-295. 2003
6. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treat-ment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 113:62-72. 1998
7. Woodside DG, Metaxas A, Altuna G. The influence of funct-ional appliance therapy on glenoid fossa remodeling. Am J Or-thod Dentofacial Orthop; 92:181-98. 1987
8. Defabianis P. TMJ internal derangement treatment in the grow-ing patient: effect of functional appliance therapy on condyle and fossa relocation. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 29:11-18. 2004
9. Rabie ABM, Ha U. Functional appliance therapy accelerates and enhances condylar growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or-thop; 123:40-48. 2003
10. Rabie AB, She TT, Harley VR. Forward mandibular positioning upregulates SOX9 and type II collagen expression in the glenoid fossa. J Dent Res; 82:725-30. 2003
11. Carels C, van Steenberghe D. Changes in neuromuscular reflexes in the masseter muscles during functional jaw orthopedic treatment in children. Am J Orthod Dento-facial Orthop; 90:410-19. 1986
12. Oudet C, Petrovic A, Garcia P. An experimental orthopedic treatment of the rat mandible using a functional appliance alters the fibre and myosin types in masticatory muscles. Reprod Nutr Dev; 28:795-803. 1988
13. Hiyama S, Ono PT, Ishiwata Y, Kuroda T, McNamara JA. Neu-romuscular and skeletal adaptations following man dibular for-ward positioning induced by Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod; 70:442-53. 2000
14. Singh GD, Clark WJ. Localization of mandibular changes in pa-tients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with Twin-block appliances: finite element scaling analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 119:419-25. 2001
15. Chen JY, Will LA, Niederman R. Analysis of efficacy of func-tional appliances on mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofa-cial Orthop; 122:470-476. 2002
16. Reed RT. Orthodontic research. Br Dent J; 24:168-231. 1990
17. Trenouth MJ, Mew JRC, Gibbs WW. Cephalometric evalu-ation of the Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion with matched normative data. Am J Or-thod Dentofacial Orthop; 117:54-59. 2000
18. Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Treatment effects of the Herbst appli-ance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 95:138-47. 1989
19. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measure-ments: 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod; 60:111-27. 1971
20. Quadrelli C, Gheorgiu M, Marcheti C, Ghiglione V. Early myo-functional approach to skeletal Class II. Mondo Orthod; 2:109- 22. 2002
21. Usumez S, Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Karaman AI, Gu-ray E. The effects of early preorthodontic Trainer treatment on Class II, division 1 patients. Angle Orthod; 74:605-09, 2004
22. McNamara JA, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Frankel appliances in the treatment of Class II mal-occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 98:134-44. 1990
23. Firatli S, Ulgen M. The effects of the FR-3 appliance on the trans-versal dimension. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 110:55-60. 1996
24. Moorrees CF. The dentition of the growing child. A longitudi-nal study of dental development between 3 and 18 years of age. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1959.
25. Rabie ABM, Ha U. Functional appliance therapy accelerates and enhances condylar growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or-thop; 123:40-48. 2002
26. Adkins MD, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Arch perimeter changes on rapid palatal expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 97:194-99. 1990
27. Akkaya S, Lorenzon S, Ucem TT. Comparison of dental archand arch perimeter changes between bonded rapid and slowmaxil-lary expansion procedures. Eur J Orthod; 20: 255-61. 1998
28. Gafari J, Jacobson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Shofer FS, Laster LL. Changes of arch width in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 106:496-502. 1994
29. Kalogirou K, Ahlgren J, Klinge B. Effects of buccal shields on the maxillary dentoalveolar structures and the midpalatal suture: histologic and biometric studies in rabbits. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 109:521-30. 1996
30. Thuer U, Sieber R, Ingervall B. Cheek and tongue pressures in-the molar areas and the atmospheric pressure in the palatal vault in young adults. Eur J Orthod; 21:299-309. 1999
31. Lindner A, Hellsing E. Cheek and lip pressure against maxillary dental arch during dummy sucking. Eur J Orthod; 13;362-366. 1991
32. Haas AJ. Long-term postreatment evaluation of rapid palatal ex-pansion. Angle Orthod; 50;189-217. 1980
33. Fränkel R. Technik und Handhabung der Funktionsregler. Ber-lin: Verlag;14-16. 1975
34. Lux CJ, Conradt C, Burden D, Komposch G. Dental arch widths and mandibular-maxillary base widths in Class II malocclusions between early mixed and permanent dentitions. Angle Orthod; 73; 674-85, 2003
35. Slaj M, Jezina MA, Lauc T, Rajic-Mestrovic S, Miksic M. Lon-gitudinal dental arch changes in the mixed dentition. Angle Or-thod; 73;509-14,. 2003
Top