Title
Author
DOI
Article Type
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Article Menu
Export Article
More by Authors Links
Article Data
- Views 664
- Dowloads 103
Original Research
Open AccessEffect of Mixing Process on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Cements Used in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment on Primary Molars
Effect of Mixing Process on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Cements Used in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment on Primary Molars
- Fernanda de Morais Ferreira1,*,
- Miriam Pimenta Parreira do Vale1
- Wellington Corrêa Jansen1
- Saul Martins Paiva1
- Isabela Almeida Pordeus1
1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dentistry School, University of São Paulo (FO-USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.31.4.w61062505158g841 Vol.31,Issue 4,July 2007 pp.251-256
Published: 01 July 2007
*Corresponding Author(s): Fernanda de Morais Ferreira E-mail: fmoraisf@yahoo.com.br
Abstract
Aiming to assess the effect of mixing process on microleakage, 40 primary molars were filled with encapsulated glass ionomer cements (GICs) (Vidrion,RCaps and Fuji,IXGPFAST) or with GICs stored in bottles (Vidrion,R and Fuji,IX). Dye penetration was assessed using scores. Encapsulation and mechanical mixing have reduced significantly marginal microleakage levels in class II restorations performed with conventional GICs if compared to the values obtained by their bottled correspondents (p=0,000).
Keywords
Atraumatic restorative treatment, glass ionomer, mixing, encapsulate and pre-dose
Cite and Share
Fernanda de Morais Ferreira,Miriam Pimenta Parreira do Vale,Wellington Corrêa Jansen,Saul Martins Paiva,Isabela Almeida Pordeus. Effect of Mixing Process on Microleakage of Glass Ionomer Cements Used in Atraumatic Restorative Treatment on Primary Molars. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2007. 31(4);251-256.
References
1. Sepet E, Aytepe Z, Guven Y. Artificially formed caries-like lesions around Class II glass ionomer restorations in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 20: 37-40, 1995.
2. Morabito A, Defabianis P. The marginal seal of various res- torative materials in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22: 51- 54, 1997.
3. Virmani S, Tandon S, Rao N. Cuspal fracture resistence and microleakage of glass ionomer cements in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22: 55-58, 1997.
4. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. How effective is ART in the man-agement of dental caries? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 27: 423-430, 1999.
5. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 26: 372-381, 1998.
6. Mallow PK, Durward CS, Klaipo M. Restoration of perm- anent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the-atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement. Int J Paediatr Dent 8: 35-40, 1998.
7. Ho TFT, Smales RJ, Fang DTS. A 2 year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treat-ment (ART) technique. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 27: 195-201, 1999.
8. Wong MC, Schwarz E, Lo ECM. Patterns of dental caries severity in Chinese kindergarten children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 25: 343-347, 1997.
9. Lo ECM, Holmgren CJ. Provision of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) in restorations to Chinese pre-school child-ren – a 30 month evaluation. Int J Paediatr Dent 11: 3-10, 2001.
10. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Quintessence Int 33: 17-21, 2002.
11. Verbeeck RMH, DeMoor RJG, VanEven DFJ, Martens LC. The short-term fluoride release of a hand-mixed vs. capsu-lated systems of a restorative glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 72: 577-581, 1993.
12. Gee D, Pearson GJ. Effect of mixing speed on mechanical properties of encapsulated glass-ionomer cements. Br Dent J 174: 65-68, 1993.
13. Kilpatrick NM, McCabe JF, Murray JJ. Factors that influence the setting characteristics of encapsulated glass ionomer ce-ments. J Dent 22: 182-187, 1994.
14. Mitchell CA, Orr JF, Russel MD. Capsulated versus hand-mixed glass-ionomer luting cements for post retention. J Dent 26: 47-51, 1998.
15. Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Effect of mixing methods on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cements. J Dent 29: 205- 210, 2001.
16. Brooks ES, Miller BH, Nakagima H, Guo I. Manipulation effects on fluoride release from chemically-cured and resin- modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 10: 120-122, 1997.
17. Miller BH, Komatsu H, Nakajima H, Okabe T. Effect of glass ionomer manipulation on early fluoride release. Am J Dent 8: 182- 186, 1995.
18. Mitchell CA, Douglas WH. Comparison of the porosity of hand-mixed and capsulated glass-ionomer luting cements. Biomaterials 18: 1127-1131, 1997.
19. Yap AUJ, Tan S, Teh TY. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth coloured restoratives: Part 1. Convencional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Oral Re-habil 27: 117-123, 2000.
20. McLean JW, Wilson AD. The clinical development of glass-ionomer cements: Formulation and properties. Aust Dent J 22: 31-36, 1977.
21. Arcoria CJ, Vitasek BA, DeWald JP, Wagner MJ. Microleak-age in restorations with glass ionomer liners after thermocy-cling. J Dent 18: 107-112, 1990.
22. Bullard RH, Leifelder KF, Russel CM. Effect of coefficient of thermal expansion on microleakage. J Am Dent Assoc 116: 871-874, 1988.
23. Scherer W, Kaim J, Gottlieb-Schein E, Roffe-Bauer, M. Mi-croleakage of capsulated glass ionomer cements. Am J Dent 2: 355-357, 1989.
24. Alperstein KS, Graver HT, Herold RC. Marginal leakage of glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Prosthet Dent 50: 803-807, 1983.
25. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. Effect of desic-cation on microleakage of five Class 5 restorative materials. Oper Dent 21: 90-95, 1996.
26. Fuks AB, Holan G, Simon H, Lewinstein I. Microleakage of-class 2 glass-ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars. Oper Dent 17: 62-69, 1992.
27. Triadan H. When is microleakage a real clinical problem?Oper Dent 12: 153-157, 1987.
28. Heys RJ, Fitzgerald M. Microleakage of three cement bases. J Dent Res 70: 55-58, 1991.
29. Rutar J, McAllan L, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 22: 486-488, 2000.
30. Honkala E, Behbehami J, Ibricevic H, Kerosuo E, Al-Jame G. The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach to restoring primary teeth in a standard dental clinic. Int J Pae-diatr Dent 13: 172-9, 2003.
31. Hübel S, Mejàre I. Cenventional versus resin-modified glass-ionomer cement for Class II restorations in primary molars. A 3-year clinical study. Int J Paediatr Dent 13: 2-8, 2003.
32. Kilpatrick NM. Durability of restorations in primary molars. J Dent 21: 67-73, 1993.
33. Going RE. Microleakage around dental restorations: a sum-marizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 84: 1349-1357, 1972.
34. Cooley RL, Train TE. Comparison of manually and mechan-ically mixed glass ionomers. J Prosthet Dent 66: 773-776, 1991.
35. Zyskind D, Frenkel A, Fuks A, Hirschfeld Z. Marginal leak-age around V-shaped cavities restored with glass-ionomer ce-ments: an in vitro study. Quintessence Int 22: 41-5, 1991.
36. Alonso RCB, Sinhoreti MAC, Correr Sobrinho L, Consani S, Goes MF. Effect of resin liners on the microleakage of class V dental composite restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 12: 56-61, 2004.
Abstracted / indexed in
Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.
Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.
Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.
JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.
Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.
BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.
Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.
Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.
Submission Turnaround Time
Conferences
Top