Article Data

  • Views 729
  • Dowloads 133

Original Research

Open Access

Dentists’ Perceptions, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Experience about Child Abuse and Neglect in Northeast Italy

  • S. Manea1,*,
  • G. A. Favero1
  • E. Stellini1
  • L. Romoli2
  • M. Mazzucato2
  • P. Facchin3

1Department of Pediatrics, Padua University, Italy

2Integrated Department of Dentistry, Padua University, Italy

3Private Dentist, Treviso, Italy

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.32.1.f920721252jx3614 Vol.32,Issue 1,January 2008 pp.19-26

Published: 01 January 2008

*Corresponding Author(s): S. Manea E-mail: manea@pediatria.unipd.it

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze dentists’ perceptions, attitudes, knowledge and experience about child abuse and neglect (CAN) in an area of northeast Italy and the factors affecting the recognition and reporting of CAN cases.

Material and Methods: One hundred six dentists working in both public and private sectors in the provinces of Padua and Treviso were interviewed by a single operator. Descriptive and assessing association analyses were carried out.

Results: Dentists’ perceptions about CAN is low, and these professionals have a poor attitude toward con-fronting it according to the code of conduct and laws. Available information and education are also poor. Education affects the detection and the reporting of CAN cases in a relevant way. Female gender is another factor that affects the attitude and the perception of CAN.

Conclusions: The results, which are consistent with other studies, show that there is a general lack of knowl-edge about CAN that prevents dentists from detecting and identifying suspected cases. Despite its frequent occurrence among dental patients, neglect is the least known and identified type of abuse. Education is the critical element in enhancing the ability of professionals to detect cases.

J Clin Pediatr Dent 32(1): 19–26, 2007

Cite and Share

S. Manea,G. A. Favero,E. Stellini,L. Romoli,M. Mazzucato,P. Facchin. Dentists’ Perceptions, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Experience about Child Abuse and Neglect in Northeast Italy. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2008. 32(1);19-26.

References

1. World Health Organization, Report of the Consultation on Child Abuse Prevention (document WHO/HSC/PVI/99.1); (29-31 March); Geneva, Switzerland. WHO, 1999.

2. Manciaux M, Gabel M, Girodet D, Mignot C, Royer M, Enfances en danger. Paris: Édition Fleurus Psycho-Pédagogie 1997.

3. Waldman HB. Child abusers, the abused and the murdered: in our nation and your state. ASDC J Dent Child 64: 169–75; 1997.

4. Facchin P. Regional policies in Veneto Region. Proceedings of the Euro-pean Conference on Reducing Social Inequalities in Health among Chil-dren and Young People; Dec 9–10; Copenhagen, Denmark, United Nations; 2002.

5. Halperin DS, Bouvier O, Jaffé P, Mounoud RL, Pawlak C, Laedemach J, et al. Prevalence of child sexual abuse among adolescents in Geneva: results of a cross sectional survey.” BMJ 312: 1326–29, 1996.

6. James AC, Neil P. Juvenile sexual offending: one year period prevalence study within Oxfordshire. Child Abuse Negl 20: 477–85, 1996.

7. Lopez F, Carpintero E, Hernandez A, Martin MJ, Fuertes A. Prevalence and sequelae of childhood sexual abuse in Space. Child Abuse Negl 19: 1039–50, 1995.

8. Heikki S, Antti V. The prevalence of child sexual abuse in Finland. Child Abuse Negl 18: 827–35, 1994.

9. Wattam C. The comparative study of child abuse in Europe. Proceedings of the 4th European Conference about Maltreated Child; 28–31 March; Padua, Italy. Cleup. 1993.

10. Creighton S. An epidemiological study of abused children and their families in the United Kingdom between 1977 and 1982. Child Abuse Negl 9: 441–48, 1985.

11. Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Oral and Dental Aspects of Child Abuse and Neglect. Pediatrics 104: 348–50, 1999.

12. Haug, RH, Foss J. Maxillofacial injuries in the pediatric patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 90: 126–34, 2000.

13. Terezhalmy GT, Riley CK, Moore WS. Oral lesions secondary to fella-tio. Quintessence Int 31: 361, 2000.

14. Lee L, Ilan J, Mulvey T. Human biting of children and oral manifesta-tions of abuse: a case report and literature review. ASDC J Dent Child Jan–Apr: 92–95, 2002.

15. Jesee, SA. Orofacial manifestations of child abuse and neglect. Amer Family Phys 52: 1829–34, 1995.

16. Meadow R. ABC of child abuse. Bedford: BMJ Editor; 1989.

17. Naidoo S. A profile of the oro-facial injuries in child physical abuse at a children’s hospital. Child Abuse Negl 24: 521–34, 2000.

18. Jesse SA. Physical manifestations of child abuse to the head, face and mouth. ASDC J Dent Child 62: 245–49, 1995,

19. Da Fonseca MA, Feigal, RJ, Ten Bensel RW. Dental aspects of 1248 cases of child maltreatment on file at a major country hospital. Pediatr Dent 14: 152–7, 1992.

20. Malecz RE. Child abuse, its relationship to pedodontics: a survey. ASDC J Dent Child 46: 193–4, 1979.

21. John V, Messer LB, Arora R, Fung S, Hatzis E, Nguyen T, et al. Child abuse and dentistry: a study of knowledge and attitudes among dentists in Victoria, Australia. Aust Dent J 44: 259–67, 1999.

22. Kilpatrick NM, Scott J, Robinson S. Child protection: a survey of expe-rience and knowledge within the dental profession of New South Wales, Australia. Int J Paed Dent 9: 153–9, 1999.

23. Ramos-Gomez F, Rothman D, Blain S. Knowledge and attitudes among California dental care providers regarding Child Abuse and Neglect. J Am Dent Assoc 129: 3401–87, 1998.

24. Adair SM, Yaresbi S, Wray IA, Hanes CM, Sama DR, Russell CM, Demographic, educational, and experiential factors associated with den-tist’s decision to report hypothetical cases of child maltreatment. Pediatr Dent 19: 466–9, 1997.

25. Adair SM, Wray IA, Hanes CM, Sams DR, Yasrebi S, Russell CM. Per-ceptions associated with dentists’ decisions to report hypothetical cases of child maltreatment. Pediatr Dent 19: 461–5, 1997.

26. Zavras AL, Pai LH. Child abuse: attitudes and perceptions of health pro-fession students–a pilot study. J Clinic Ped Dent 22: 23–7, 1997.

27. Von Burg MM, Hazelrigg CO, Shoemaker JA, Hibbard RA. A statewide survey of dentist’s knowledge of abuse. ASDC J Dent Child 60: 321–4, 1993.

28. Saxe, MD, McCourt JW. Child Abuse: A survey of ASDC members. ASDC J Dent Child 58: 361–6, 1991.

29. Davis GR, Domoto PK, Levy RL. The dentist’s role in Child Abuse and Neglect. ASDC J Dent Child 46: 185–92, 1979.

30. Diaz A, Simantov E, Rickert VI. Effect of Abuse on Health, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 56: 811–17, 2002.

31. Margolin G, Gordis EB. The effects of family and community violence children. Annu Rev Psychol 51: 445–79, 2000.

32. Senn DR, McDowell JD, Alder ME. Dentistry’s role in the recognition and reporting of domestic violence, abuse, and neglect. J Forensic Odont 45: 343–63, 2001.

33. Flaherty EG, Sege R, Mattson CL, Binns HJ. Assessment of Suspicion of Abuse in the Primary Care Setting. Ambul Pediatr 2002; 2: 120–6.

34. Morris JL, Johson CF, Clasen M. To report or not to report. Physicians’ attitudes toward discipline and child abuse. Am J Dis Child 139: 194–7, 1985.

35. Van Haeringen AR, Dadds M, Armstrong KL. The child abuse lottery –will the doctor suspect and report? Physician attitudes towards and reporting of suspected child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Negl 22: 159–69, 1998.

36. Zellman GL. The impact of case characteristics on child abuse report-ing decisions. Child Abuse Negl 16: 57–74, 1992.

37. Zellman GL. Report decision-making patterns among mandated child abuse reporters. Child Abuse Negl 14: 325–36, 1990.

38. Bratthall D, Haesel Petersson, G. Cariogram – a multifactorial risk assessment model for a multifactorial disease. Community Dent and Oral Epidemiol 33: 256–64, 2005.

39. McGrath C, Bedi R. The association between dental anxiety and oral health-related quality of life in Britain. Community Dent and Oral Epi-demiol 32: 67-72, 2004.

40. Nicolau B, Mercenes W, Sheiham A. The relationship between traumatic dental injuries and adolescents’ development along the life course. Community Dent and Oral Epidemiol 31: 306–13, 2003.

41. Jesse SA. Risk factors as determinants of dental neglect in children. ASDC J Dent Child 65: 17–20, 1998.

42. Facchin P. The state of the art of child protection in Europe: an interna-tional comparison. In Report of the First Meeting on Strategies for Child Protection (document: EUR/ICP/FMLY 01 03 01); Oct 29–31: Padova, Italy. WHO, 1998.

43. Gunn VL, Hickson GB, Cooper WO. Factors affecting Pediatricians’ reporting of suspected child maltreatment. Ambul Pediatr 5: 96–101, 2005.

44. Badger LW. Reporting of child abuse: influence of characteristics of physician, practice, and community. South Med J 82: 281–86, 1989.

45. Dukes RL, Kean RB. An experimental study of gender and situation in the perception and reportage of child abuse. Child Abuse Negl 13: 351–60, 1989.

46. Flaherty EG, Sege R. Barriers to physician identification and reporting of child abuse. Pediatr Ann 34: 349–56, 2005.

47. Mouden LD. How dentistry succeeds in preventing family violence. J Mich Dent Assoc 78: 44–8, 1996.

48. Chang A, Oglesby AC, Wallace HM. Child Abuse and neglect: physi-cians’ knowledge, attitudes, and experience. Amer J Publ Health 66: 1199–201, 1976.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top