Article Data

  • Views 651
  • Dowloads 154

Original Research

Open Access

Analysis of Photoreflectance and Microhardness of the Enamel in Primary Teeth Submitted to Different Bleaching Agents

  • Sabrina Fróes Faria Campos1
  • Ilene Cristine Rosia César1
  • Egberto Munin1
  • Priscila Christiane Suzy Liporoni1
  • Marcos Augusto do Rego1

1Dentistry College. Taubaté University, UNITAU. Taubaté - SP. Brazil

2,

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.32.1.n427315267x36261 Vol.32,Issue 1,January 2008 pp.9-12

Published: 01 January 2008

*Corresponding Author(s): Marcos Augusto do Rego E-mail: marcosrego@uol.com.br

Abstract

Treatment of darkened teeth in children is of great importance from an esthetic-functional point of view and for the psychoemotional development of the child. The objective of the present study was to determine the in vitro efficacy of three bleaching agents for whitening of artificially stained primary teeth. Fifty anterior primary teeth were artificially stained and then divided into three experimental groups (n = 15) submitted to bleaching treatment with 35% hydrogen peroxide gel, 35% carbamide peroxide gel, and 35% carbamide peroxide gel mixed with sodium perborate powder. The control group (n = 5) was not submitted to any bleaching treatment. Color changes were evaluated with a reflectance spectrophotometer and possible alterations in the enamel surface after bleaching were measured by Vickers microhardness testing. The data were assessed using the Student's t test. The results confirmed the bleaching action of the three agents tested. No significant difference in mean microhardness was observed between the three bleaching agents when compared to the control group.

Keywords

tooth whitening; primary teeth; bleaching agents; enamel microhardness; reflectance

Cite and Share

Sabrina Fróes Faria Campos,Ilene Cristine Rosia César,Egberto Munin,Priscila Christiane Suzy Liporoni,Marcos Augusto do Rego. Analysis of Photoreflectance and Microhardness of the Enamel in Primary Teeth Submitted to Different Bleaching Agents. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2008. 32(1);9-12.

References

1. Bussadori SK, Roth F, Guede CC, Fernandes KP, Domingues MM, Wanderley MY. Bleaching non vital primary teeth: case report. J Clin Pediatr Dent 30: 179–82, 2006.

2. Cesar ICR, Redigolo ML, Liporoni PCS, Munin E. Analyses by photor-reflectance spectros copy and Vickers hardness of conventional and laser-assisted tooth bleaching. Am J Dent 18: 219–22, 2006.

3. Chng HK, Palmara JEA, Messer HH. Effect of hidrogen peroxide and sodium perborate on biomechanical properties of human dentin. J Endodontics 28: 62–7, 2002.

4. Donly KJ, Donly AS, Baharloo L, Rojas-Candelas E, Garcia-Godoy F, Zhou X, Gerlach RW. Tooth whitening in children. Comp Contin Educ Dent 23: 22–8, 2002.

5. Freccia WF, Peters DD. A technique for staining extracted teeth: a research and teaching aid for bleaching. J Endod 8: 67–9, 1982.

6. Haywood VB, Heymann HO. Nightguard vital bleaching. Quintessence Int 20: 173–6, 1989.

7. Haywood VB, Nightguard vital bleaching: current concepts and research. J Am Dent Assoc, 128: 195–255, 1997.

8. Haywood VB. History, safety and effectiveness of current bleaching techniques and applications of the nightguard vital bleaching technique. Quintessence Int 23: 471–88, 1992.

9. Ho S, Goerig AC. An in vitro comparison of different bleaching agents in the discolored tooth. J Endod 15: 106–11, 1989.

10. Kwon YH, Huo MS, Kim KH, Kim SK, Kim YJ. Effects of hydrogen peroxide on the light reflectance and morphology of bovine enamel. J Oral Rehabil 29: 473–7, 2002.

11. Lake FT, O’dell NL, Walton RE. The effect of internal bleaching on tetracycline in dentin. J Endod 11: 415–20,1985.

12. Lewinstein I, Hirschfeld Z, Stabholz A, Rotstein I. Effect of hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate on the microhardness of human enamel and dentin. J Endod 20: 61–3, 1994.

13. Lim KC. Considerations in intracoronal bleaching. Aust Endod J 30: 69–73, 2004.

14. Lim MY, Lum SOY, Poh RSC, Lee GP, Lim KC. An in vitro compari-son of the bleaching efficacy of 35% carbamide peroxide with estab-lished intracoronal bleaching agents. Int Endod J 37: 483–8, 2004.

15. Lussi A, Kohler N, Zero D, Schaffner M, Megert B. A comparison of the erosive potential of different beverages in primary and permanent teeth using an in vitro model. Europ J Oral Sci 108: 110–4, 2000.

16. McEvoy SA. Chemical agents for removing intrinsic stains from vital teeth. I. Techinique development. Quintessence Int 20: 323–8, 1989.

17. Pinheiro Júnior EC, Fidel RAS, Cruz Filho AM, Silva RG, Pécora JD. In vitro action of various carbamide peroxide gel bleaching agents on microhardness of human enamel. Braz Dent J 7: 75–9, 1996.

18. Ruse ND, Smith DC, Torneck CD, Titley KC. Preliminary surface analy-sis of etched, bleached, and normal bovine enamel. J Dent Res 69: 1610–13, 1990.

19. Spalding M, Taveira LA, De Assis GF. Scanning electron microscopy study of dental enamel surface exposed to 35% hydrogen peroxide: alone, with saliva, and with 10% carbamide peroxide. J Esthe Rest Dent 15: 154–64, 2003.

20. Timpawat S, Nipattamon C, Kijsamanmith K, Messer HH. Effect of bleaching agents on bonding to pulp chamber dentin. Int Endod J, 38: 211–7, 2005.

21. Turkun M, Sevgican F, Pehlivan Y, Aktener BO. Effects of 10% car-bamide peroxide on the enamel surface morphology: a scanning elec-tron microscopy study. J Esthe Rest Dent 14: 238–44, 2002.

22. Warren W, Wong M, Ingran T. An in vitro comparison of bleaching agents on the crowns and roots of discolored teeth. J Endod 16: 463–7, 1999.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top