Comparison of the Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chemomechanical Caries Removal (carisolv™) with that of Conventional Drilling in Reducing Cariogenic Flora

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv™) in reducing the count of cariogenic flora and compare it to conventional drilling.Materials: The study group consisted of 20 healthy children aged between four and eight years. In each child, two primary molars with broad occlusal cavitated lesions were chosen for caries removal either with Carisolv™ or by conventional drilling. Dentin samples of both groups were taken prior to and following caries removal. They were then processed after suitable dilutions and cultured using Schaedler agar for the Total Viable Bacteria and MRS agar for the lactobacilli. After incubation at 35°C for 3 days, the Total Viable Count and lactobacilli count was determined and expressed as Colony Forming Units per ml. The two methods of caries removal were then compared and the data was statistically analyzed. Both methods reduced the TVC count by 92% and lactobacilli count by 91%. Results have indicated that the antimicrobial efficacy of Carisolv™ was comparable to that of conventional drilling and can be used as a suitable alternative for caries removal, especially in children.

Chemomechanical caries removal, Carisolv™, conventional drilling, Total Viable Count, lactobacilli count, Colony Forming Unit

1. Beeley JA, Yip HK, Stevenson AG. Chemo mechanical caries removal: A review of the techniques and latest development. Br Dent J, 188 (8): 427–430, 2000.

2. Azrak B, Callaway A, Grundheder A, Stender E, Willershansen B. Comparison of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Cari-solv™) with that of conventional excavation in reducing cariogenic flora. Int J Paed Dent,14 (3): 182–191, 2004.

3. Banerjee A, Watson T, Kidd EAM. Dentine caries excavation. A review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J, 188: 476–482, 2000.

4. Munshi AK, Hegde AM, Shetty PK. Clinical evaluation of Carisolv® in the chemico-mechanical removal of carious dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 26 (1): 49–54, 2001.

5. Nadanovsky P, Carneino FC, Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments. A comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods. Caries Res, 35(5): 384–389, 2001.

6. Goldman M, Kronman JM. A preliminary report on chemo mechanical means of removing caries. J Am Dent Assoc, 93: 1149–1153, 1976.

7. Ziskind D, Kupietzky A, Beyth N. First choice treatment alternatives for caries removal using the chemomechanical method. Quintessence Int, 36: 9–14, 2005.

8. Roeters FJM, Van der Hoeven JS, Burgersdijk RCW, Schaeken MJM.Lactobacilli, Mutans streptococci and dental caries. A longitudi-nal study in 2 year old children upto the age of 5 years. Caries Res, 29: 272–279, 1995.

9. Brailsford SR, Sheehy EC, Gilbert SC, Clark DT, Kidd EAM, Zoitopoules L, Adams SE, Visser JM, Beighton D. The micro flora of the erupting first permanent molar. Caries Res, 39: 78–84. 2005.

10. Hoshino E. Predominant obligate anaerobes in human carious dentin. J. Dent Res, 64(10): 1195–1198, 1985.

11. Nancy J, Dorignae G. Lactobacilli from dentin and saliva in children. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 16: 107–111, 1992.

12. Margakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Clinical evaluation by patients of chemomechanical varies removal in primary molars and its acceptance by patients. Caries Res, 35: 205–210, 2001.

13. Kakaboura A, Masouras C, Staikou O, Vougiouklakis. A comparative clinical study on the Carisolv caries removal method. Quintessence Int, 34(4): 269–271, 2003.

14. Corner GM, Alonso RCB, Grando MF, Borges AFS, Puppin-Rontani RM. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on primary dentin - A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation. J Dent, 34: 454–459, 2006.

15. Bjorndal L, Larsen T. Changes in the cultivable flora in deep carious lesions following a stepwise excavation procedure. Caries Res, 34: 502–508, 2000

16. Kidd EAM, Joyston Bechal S, Beighton D. Microbiological validation of assessments of caries activity during cavity preparation. Caries Res, 27: 402–408, 1993.

17. Lager A, Thornqvist E, Ericson D. Cultivable bacteria in dentine after caries excavation using Rose-bur or Carisolv. Caries Res, 37: 206–211, 2003.

18. Ericson D, Zimmerman M, Raber H, Gotrick B, Bornstein R. Clinical evaluation of efficacy and safety of a new method for chemo-mechan-ical removal of caries, A multi-centre study. Caries Res, 33: 171–177, 1999.

19. Kneist S, Heinrich-weltzian R, Stoesser L. The micro-flora on the cav-ity floor after chemomechanical caries removal. Caries Res, 36: 174–222, 2002.

20. Balciuniene I, Sabalaite R, Juskiene I. Chemomechanical caries removal for children. Stomatologia Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial J, 7(2): 40–44, 2005.

21. Guida A. Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite and its effects on dentin. Minerva Stomatol, 55 (9): 471–482, 2006.