Relationship between malocclusion and behavioral, demographic and socioeconomic variables: a cross-sectional study of 5-year-olds

Objective: Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the prevalence and the severity of malocclusion have increased over the years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between malocclusions,such as open bite and crossbite, and behavioral, demographic and socioeconomic variables in a sample of 5-year-old children attending preschools. Methods: The random sample consisted of 728 preschool children attending 22 public (n=428) and 18 private (n=300) preschools. A calibrated examiner performed the epidemiological examination outdoors, under natural light, using dental mirror and CPI probe. Information on socioeconomic status and the presence of deleterious oral habits was collected by a questionnaire sent to parents. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: The deleterious oral habits were observed in 83.1% of the children and were significantly associated with social class. Pacifier use (OR=21.71), thumb sucking (OR=4.72); atypical swallowing (OR=7.35) and mouth breathing(OR=4.65) were risk indicators for open bite. Pacifier use (OR=1.59), lip interposition (OR=1.78), mouth breathing (OR=1.96) and gender (OR=1.88) were risk indicators for crossbite. Conclusions: Environmental factors, such as the presence of deleterious oral habits as well as social class, play an important role in identifying children with open and/or crossbite.

Epidemiology; Prevalence; Malocclusion; Social class; Preschool

1. Saturno LD. Características de la oclusion de 3630 escolares del area metropolitana de Caracas. Acta Odont Venez, 18: 237–63, 1980.

2. Isikwe MC. Malocclusion in Lagos, Nigeria. Comm Dent Oral Epi-demiol, 11: 59–62, 1983.

3. Silva CHT, Araújo TM. Prevalência de más oclusões em escolares na Ilha do Governador, Rio de Janeiro. Parte I. Classe I, II e III (Angle) e mordida cruzada. Ortodontia, 16: 10–6, 1983.

4. Oliveira CM. Maloclusão no contexto da saúde pública. In: Böneker M, Sheiham A. Promovendo saúde bucal na infância e adolescência: con-hecimentos e práticas. São Paulo: Livraria e Editora Santos, 55–80, 2004.

5. Corruccini RS. An epidemiologic transition in dental occlusion in world populations. Am J Orthod, 86: 419–26, 1984.

6. De Muelenaere JJGG, Wiltshire WA, Viljoen WP. The occlusal status of an urban and a rural Venda group. J Dent Assoc South Afr, 47: 517–20, 1992.

7. Weiland FJ, Jonke E, Bantleon HP. Secular trends in malocclusion in Austrian men. Eur J Orthod, 19: 355–9, 1997.

8. Brin I, Zwilling-Sellam O, Harari D, Koyoumdjisky-Kaye E, Ben-Bas-sat Y. Does a secular trend exist in the distribution of occlusal patterns?Angle Orthod, 68: 81–4, 1998.

9. Ramos AL, Gasparetto A, Terada HH, Furquim LZ, Basso P, Meireles RP. Assistência ortodôntica preventiva-interceptora em escolares do município de Porto Rico - Parte I: prevalência das más-oclusões. Rev Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial, 5: 9–13, 2000.

10. WHO: Oral health surveys – basic methods. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1997.

11. Brazil. Ministério da Saúde: Projeto SB Brazil: condições de saúde bucal da população brasileira 2002–2003—resultados principais. Brasília, 2004.

12. Frazão P. Epidemiologia da oclusão dentária na infância e os sistemas de saúde. [Tese]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Saúde Pública – USP, 1999.

13. De Vis H, De Boever JA, Van Cauwenbenberghe P. Epidemiologic surgery of functional conditions of the masticatory system in Belgian children age 3-6 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 12: 203–7, 1984.

14. Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1977.

15. Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S. Sample Size Determination in Health Stud-ies: A Practical Manual. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1991.

16. Meneghim MC, Kozlowski FC, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GMB, Meneghim ZMAP. Classificação socioeconômica e sua discussão em relação à prevalência de cárie e fluorose dentária. Ciênc saúde coletiva, 12: 523–529, 2007.

17. SAS User’s Guide. Statistics, version 8.2. Cary [NY]: SAS Institute Inc, 2001.

18. Kharband OP, Sidhu SS, Sundaram K, Shukla DK. Oral habits in school going children of Delhi: a prevalence study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 21: 120–124, 2003.

19. Degan VV, Puppin-Rontani RM. Prevalence of pacifier-sucking habits and successful methods to eliminate them - a preliminary study. J Dent Child (Chic), 71: 148–51, 2004.

20. Lopez Del Valle LM, Singh GD, Feliciano N, Machuca M C. Associa-tions between a history of breast feeding, malocclusion and parafunc-tional Habits in Puerto Rican children. P R Health Sci J, 25: 31–4, 2006.

21. Dadalto ECV. Hábitos de sucção de dedo e/ou chupeta- estudo sec-cional. [Dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro: FO/UFRJ, 1999.

22. Paunio P, Rautava P, Sillanpää M. The Finnish family competence study: the effects of living conditions on sucking habits in 3-year-old Finnish children and association between these habits and dental occlu-sion. Acta Odont Scand, 51: 23–9, 1993.

23. Tomita NE. Relação entre determinantes sócio-econômicos e hábitos bucais: influências na oclusão de pré-escolares de Bauru – SP - Brazil.[Tese]. São Paulo: USP, 1997.

24. Infante PF. An epidemiologic study of finger habits in preschool chil-dren as related to malocclusion, socioeconomic status, race sex and size of community. J Dent Child, 43: 33–8, 1976.

25. Bittencourt LP, Bastos EPS, Modesto A, Tura LFR. Hábitos de sucção: desigualdades sociais na área de saúde. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr, 2: 63–8, 2002.

26. Tschill P, Bacon W, Sonko A. Malocclusion in the deciduous dentition of Caucasian children. Eur J Orthod, 19: 361–7, 1997.

27. Peres KG, Barros AJ, Peres MA, Victora CG. Effects of breastfeeding and sucking habits on malocclusion in a birth cohort study. Journal of Public Health, 41: 343–350, 2007.

28. Almeida RR, Garib DG, Henriques JFC, Almeida MR, Almeida RR. Ortodontia preventiva e interceptora: mito ou realidade? Rev Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial, 4: 87–108, 1999.

29. Silva Filho OG, Freitas SF, Cavassan AO. Prevalência de oclusão nor-mal e má oclusão em escolares da cidade de Bauru (São Paulo). Parte II: Influência da estratificação sócio-econômica. Rev Odont USP, 4: 189–96, 1990.

30. Day AJW, Foster TD. An investigation into prevalence of molar cross-bite and some associated etiological conditions. Dent Pract Dent Rec, 21: 403–410, 1971.

31. Venetikidou A. Incidence of maloclusion in asthmatic children. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 17: 89–94, 1993.

32. Oulis CJ, Vadiakas GP, Ekonomides J, Dratsa J. The effect of hyper-trophic adenoids and tonsils on the development of posterior crossbite and oral habits. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 18: 197–201, 1994.

33. Franco EA, Zampier MR. Análise da prevalência de mordidas cruzadas em crianças na fase de dentição mista: etiologia e terapêutica.[Mono-grafia]. Juiz de Fora: UFJF, 1995.

34. Tomita NE, Bijella VT, Franco LJ. The relationship between oral habits and malocclusion in preschool children. Journal of Public Health, 34: 299–303, 2000.

35. Martins DR, Almeida RR, Dainesi EA. Mordidas cruzadas anterior e posterior. Parte I – diagnóstico e tratamento precoces. Apresentação de casos clínicos. Odonto, 1: 1–19, 1994.

36. Wood AWS. Anterior and posterior crossbites. J Dent Child, 29: 280–286, 1962.

37. Higley LB. Crossbite-Mandibular Malposition. J Dent Child, 35: 221–223, 1968.

38. Almeida RR, Santos SCBN, Santos ECA, Insabral CMB, Almeida MR. Mordida aberta anterior – considerações e apresentação de um caso clínico. Rev Dental Press Ortodon e Ortop Facial, 3: 17–29, 1998.

39. Onyeaso CO, Denloye OO, Taiwo JO. Preventive and interceptive orthodontic demand for malocclusion. Afr J Med Med Sci, 32: 1–5, 2003.