Article Data

  • Views 681
  • Dowloads 147

Original Research

Open Access

Effectiveness of a Basic Training Presentation on Infant Oral Health Care for Pediatric Medicine Residents

  • Amy Kebriaei1
  • Vincent Rothe1
  • Sheryl Pitner1
  • Mary Balluff1
  • Fouad Salama1

1Department, College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

2College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.33.2.14t3v37277x17q75 Vol.33,Issue 2,March 2009 pp.143-146

Published: 01 March 2009

*Corresponding Author(s): Fouad Salama E-mail: fsalama@unmc.edu

Abstract

Objective: We hypothesize that viewing educational presentation with video will provide pediatric medicine residents with instructive information on infant oral health. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate an infant oral health education program targeting University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) pediatric medicine residents.

Methods: Assessment of 32 pediatric medicine residents in the form of a questionnaire was completed immediately before and after a 60 minute educational intervention. The intervention was in the form of a PowerPoint presentation and video of infant oral health for health care providers. The 16-questions(True/false/don't know or multiple choice) questionnaire was based on the information presented in the lecture and video. Results: There was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores (p-value<0.001). The mean score on the pre-test was 10.09 out of 16 (63%) and the mean score on the post-test was 13.3 out of 16 (83%). There was no significant correlation between age, gender, or year of residency training with pre or post-test scores. Twenty-five (78.1%) reported themselves "very likely" to use the information.Conclusions: A one hour Power Point and video educational intervention was effective in teaching pediatric medicine residents basic information on infant oral health.

Keywords

infant oral health, early childhood caries, dental education, preventive dentistry

Cite and Share

Amy Kebriaei,Vincent Rothe,Sheryl Pitner,Mary Balluff,Fouad Salama. Effectiveness of a Basic Training Presentation on Infant Oral Health Care for Pediatric Medicine Residents. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2009. 33(2);143-146.

References

1. US Dept of Health and Human Services. Oral Health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockvillle, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health; 2000.

2. Pierce KM, Rozier RG, Vann WF. Accuracy of pediatric primary care providers’ screening and referral for early childhood caries. Pediatrics, 109: e82–e92, 2002.

3. Drury TF, Horowitz AM, Ismail AI, Maertens MP, Rozier RG, Selwitz RH. Diagnosing and reporting early childhood caries for research pur-poses. A report of a workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the Health Care Financing Administration. J Pub-lic Health Dent, 59: 192–197, 1999.

4. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Reference Manual: Defini-tion of Dental Home. Pediatr Dent, 28: 10, 2006–2007.

5. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Reference Manual: Policy on the dental home. Pediatr Dent, 28: 18–19, 2006–2007.

6. American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statement. Organizational principles to guide and define the child health care system and/or improve the health of all children - section on pediatric dentistry oral health risk assessment timing and establishment of the dental home. Pediatrics, 111: 1113–1116, 2003.

7. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Reference Manual: Policy on use of a caries-risk assessment tool (CAT) for infants, children and ado-lescents. Pediatr Dent, 28: 24–28, 2006–2007.

8. Lewis CW, Grossman DC, Domoto PK, Deyo RA. The role of the pedi-atrician in the oral health of children: a national survey. Pediatrics, 106: e84, 2000.

9. Nowak AJ, Warren JJ. Infant oral health and oral habits. Pediatr Clin North Am, 47: 1043–1066, 2000.

10. Harrison R. Oral health promotion for high-risk children: case studies from British Columbia. J Can Dent Assoc, 69: 292–296, 2003.

11. Stretcher VJ, O’Malley MS, Villagra VG, Campbell EE, Gonzalez JJ, Irons TG. Can residents be trained to counsel patients about quitting smoking? Results from a randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med, 6: 9–17, 1991.

12. Lazarus, K. Weinsier, RL. Boker, JR. Nutrition knowledge and prac-tices of physicians in a family-practice residency program: the effect of an education program provided by a physician nutrition specialist. Am J Clin Nutr, 58: 319–325, 1993.

13. Douglass JM, Douglass AB, Silk HJ. Infant oral health education for pediatric and family practice residents. Pediatr Dent, 27: 284–291, 2005.

14. Gonsalves WC, Skelton J, Heaton L, Smith T, Feretti G, Hardison JD. Family medicine residency directors’ knowledge and attitudes about pediatric oral health education for residents. J Dent Edu, 69: 446–452, 2005.

15. Gonsalves, WC. Skelton, J. Smith, T. Hardison, D. Ferretti, G. Physi-cian’s oral health education in Kentucky. Fam Med, 36: 544–546, 2004.

16. Sanchez OM, Childers NK, Fox L, Bradley E. Physicians’ views on pediatric preventative dental care. Pediatr Dent, 19: 377–383, 1997.

17. Ismail AI, Nainar SM, Sohn W. Children’s first dental visit: attitudes and practices of U.S. pediatricians and family physicians. Pediatr Dent, 25: 425–430, 2003.

18. Krol DM. Educating pediatricians on children’s oral health: past, pre-sent and future. Pediatrics, 113: e487–e492, 2004.

19. Davis D, O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: Do confer-ences, workshops, rounds and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA, 282: 867–874, 1999.

20. Schaff-Blass E, Rozier RG, Chattopadhyay A, Quinonez R, Vann WF. Effectiveness of an educational intervention in oral health for pediatric residents. Ambul Pediatr, 6: 157–164, 2006.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top