Genetic Sensitivity to 6-N-Propylthiouracil (PROP) As a Screening Tool for Obesity and Dental Caries in Children

Purpose: Dental caries and childhood obesity epidemics are multifactorial complex disease and children's dietary pattern is a common underlying etiologic factor in their causation. Dietary preferences and taste are genetically determined. In the present study children were identified who are at greater risk for developing dental caries and obesity so as to institute preventive measures at an early stage. Materials: Among 500 children belonging to the age group of 8-12 years of both sexes PROP sensitivity test was carried out. Body mass index was determined and the caries experience was recorded. A Questionnaire was prepared and given to the parents of the children to evaluate their dietary habits. The results were subjected to statistical analysis using prevalence test, ANOVA test and chi-square test. Results: We found that the non taster children had higher caries experience and body weight respectively as compared to children who were supertasters and medium tasters. Super-tasters tended to be sweet and fatty food dislikers and non-tasters tended to be likers. Conclusions: The PROP test proved to be a useful tool in determining the genetic sensitivity levels of the bitter taste and could be used as a useful screening tool to identify children at risk of developing obesity and dental caries.

PROP; Taste perception; Caries experience; Dietary preferences; body weight

1. Mela DJ. Determinants of food choice: relationships with obesity and weight control. Obes Res, 9 (suppl): 249S–55S, 2001.

2. Nestle M, Wing RR, Birch L, et al. Behavioral and social influences on food choice. Nutr Rev, 56 (suppl): S50–74, 1998.

3. Blundell JE, Gillett A. Control of food intake in the obese. Obes Res, 9 (suppl): 263S–70S, 2001.

4. Drewnowski A. Taste preferences and food intake. Annul Rev Nutr, 17: 237–53, 1997.

5. Strauss RS, Pollack HA. Epidemic increase in childhood overweight, 1986-1998. JAMA, 286: 2845–8. 2001.

6. Birch LL, Fisher JO. Development of eating behaviors among children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 101: 539–49, 1998.

7. Keller K L and Tepper B J. Inherited Taste Sensitivity to 6-n-Propylth-iouracil in Diet and Body Weight in Children. Obesity Research 6 June Vol. 12 No. 904–912, 2004.8. Tepper BJ and Nurse RJ. PROP taster sta-tus is related to fat perception and preference. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 855: 802–804, 1998.

9. Keller KL, Steinmann L, Nurse RJ, Tepper BJ. Genetic taste sensitivity to

6- n-propylthiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children. Appetite, 38: 3–12, 2002.

10. Lin BP. Caries experience in children with various genetic sensitivity levels to the bitter taste of 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP): A pilot study. Pediatr Dentist, 25: 37–42, 2003.

11. Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Miller IJ. PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psy-chophysics and sex effects. Physiol Behav, 56: 1165–71, 1994.

12. Pickering GJ, Simunkova K, Di Battista D. Intensity of taste and astrin-gency sensations elicited by red wines is associated with sensitivity to PROP (6-n propylthiouracil). Food Qual Prefce, 15 :147–54, 2004.

13. Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Lucchina LA, Prutkin J, Fast K. PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil) supertasters and the saltiness of NaCl. Annal New York Acad Sci, 855: 793–6, 1998.

14. Duffy VB, Davidson AC, Kidd JR, Kidd KK, Speed WC, Pakstis AJ, et al. Bitter receptor gene (TAS2R38), 6-n-propylthiouracil (prop) bitter-ness and alcohol intake. Alcoholism. Clini Exp Res, 28: 1629–37, 2004.

15. Yackinous CA, Guinard JX. Relation between taste status, taste anatomy and dietary intake measures for young men and women. Appetite, 38: 201–9, 2002.

16. Munoz KA, Krebs-Smith SM, Ballard RB, Cleveland LE. Food intake of US children and adolescents compared with recommendations. Pediatrics, 100: 323–9, 1997.

17. Lehl G, Bansal K, Sekhon R. Relationship between cariogenic diet and dental caries as evaluated from a 5-day diet diary in 4–12 yr old chil-dren. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 17: 119–121, 1999.

18. Jamel H, Sheiham A, Watt R.G. and Cowell C.R. Sweet preference, con-sumption of sweet tea and dental caries; studies in urban and rural Iraqi populations. International Dent J, 47, 213–217, 1997.

19. Downer MC. Caries experience and sucrose availability: an analysis of the relationship in the United Kingdom over 50 yrs. Community Dent Health, 16: 18–21, 1999.

20. World Health Organization. Oral health survey; basic methods. 4th Ed Geneva: World Health Organization; 1997.

21. Centers for disease control and prevention. Growth charts body mass index for age percentiles, boys and girls. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/bmi/bmi-means.htm. Accessed July 13, 2005.

22. Per Axelson. Diagnosis and risk prediction of dental caries. 2001 Vol II quintessence publishing co. inc, Sweden; 156–168.

23. Zhao L, Kirkmeyer S.V, Tepper B.J. A paper screening test to assess genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil. Physiology & Behav-ior, 78: 625–633, 2003.

24. Verma P, Shetty V, Hedge AM. Propylthiouracil (PROP) – A tool to determine taster status in relation to caries experience, streptococcus mutans levels and dietary preferences in children. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 31(2): 113–117, 2006.

25. Green BG, Shaffer GS, Gilmore MM.A semantically Labeled Magni-tude Scale of oral sensation with apparent ratio properties. Chem. Senses, 18: 683–702, 1993.

26. Peterson J, Philips M: salt liking and intake: Potential relationships with genetic variations in taste. http://ugradresearch.ucovv.edu/fur2000.html.

27. Rupesh S, Nayak UA. Genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of 6-n propy-lthiouracil: A new risk determinant for dental caries in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 24: 63–68, 2006.

28. Anliker JA, Bartoshuk L M, Ferris AM, Hooks LD. Children’s food pref-erences and genetic sensitivity to the bitter taste of PROP. Am J Clin Nutr, 54, 316–320, 1991.

29. Dehghan M, Akhtar-Danesh N and Merchant A T. Childhood obesity, prevalence and prevention. Nutrition Journal, 4: 24. 2005.

30. Tepper B.J, Ullrich N.V. Influence of genetic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP), dietary restraint and dis inhibition on body mass index in middle-aged women. Physiology & Behavior, 75: 305–312, 2002.

31. Gent JF, Bartoshuk LM. Sweetness of sucrose, neohesperidin dihydro-rochalcone, and saccharin is related to genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil. Chem Senses, 7: 265–72, 1983.

32. Drewnowski A, Henderson S.A & Barratt-fornell A. Genetic Sensitivity to 6-n-Propylthiouracil and Sensory Responses to Sugar and Fat Mix-tures. Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 63, No. 5, pp. 771–777, 1998.