Effect of a Financial Incentive on Returning for Post-Operative Care Following General Anesthesia

The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of a ten dollar financial incentive improved parental compliance in returning for their child's post-operative care appointment following dental treatment under general anesthesia at the University of Kentucky Pediatric Dentistry residency program.Study Design: Parents/guardians of 69 children scheduled for dental treatment carried out under general anesthesia at the University of Kentucky Pediatric Dentistry residency program from Oct 2007 to March 2008 were offered a $10 incentive if they returned for their one week post-operative care appointment. All subjects who returned received a $10 incentive by mail. A control consisting of 100 patients treated at the University of Kentucky Pediatric Dentistry residency program from October 2006 to April 2007 was used to determine historical return rates for post-operative care after dental treatment under general anesthesia.Results: Sixty-six percent (66%) of the control group returned for their post-operative care appointment. Sixty-five percent (65%) of the incentive group returned for their post-operative care appointment.Conclusion: Offering a $10 incentive did not increase the return rate for post-operative care following dental treatment under general anesthesia in a small study population.

hospital dentistry/general anesthesia, early childhood caries, health promotion/health services

1. Worthen TB, Mueller W. Implications of parental compliance on deci-sion making in care provided using general anesthesia in a low-income population. ASDC J Dent Child, May-Jun; 67(3): 197–9, 161, 2000.

2. Jamieson W, Vargas K. Recall rates and caries experience of patients undergoing general anesthesia for dental treatment. Pediatr Dent, May-Jun; 29(3): 253–257, 2007.

3. Roberts GJ. Caries and the preschool child: treatment of the preschool child in the hospital service. J Dent Child, Dec; 18(6): 321–4, 1990.

4. Berkowitz RJ, Moss M, Billings RJ, Weinstein P. Clinical outcomes for nursing caries treated using general anesthesia. ASDC J Dent Child, May-Jun; 64(3): 210–1, 228, 1997.

5. Foster T, Perinpanayagam H, Pfaffenbach A, Certo M. Recurrence of early childhood caries after comprehensive treatment with general anesthesia and follow-up. J Dent Child. Jan-Apr; 73(1): 25–30, 2006.

6. Sheller B, Williams BJ, Hays K, Manel L. Reasons for repeat dental treatment under general anesthesia for the healthy child. Pediatr Dent, 25: 546–52, 2003

7. Almeida AG, Roseman MM, Sheff M, Huntington N, Hughes CV. Future caries susceptibility in children with early childhood caries fol-lowing treatment under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent, 22: 302–6, 2000.

8. Enger D, Maurino A. A survey of 200 pediatric dental general anesthe-sia cases. ASDC J Dent Child, 52: 36–41, 1985.

9. Tate AR, Ng MW, Needleman HL, Acs G. Failure rates of restorative procedures following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent, 24: 69–71, 2002.

10. Primosch RE, Balsewich CM, Thomas CW. Outcomes assessment an intervention strategy to improve parental compliance to follow-up eval-uations after treatment of early childhood caries using general anesthe-sia in a Medicaid population. ASDC J Dent Child. Mar-Apr; 68(2): 102–8, 80, 2001.

11. Singer E, Bossarte RM. Incentives for survey participation, when are they “coercive”? Am J Prev Med, 31(5): 411–418, 2006.

12. Yokley JM, Glenwick DS. Increasing the immunization of preschool children; an evaluation of applied community interventions. J Appl Behav Anal. Fall, 17(3): 313–25, 1984.

13. Lawrence GL, MacIntyre CR, Hull BP, McIntyre PB. Effectiveness of the linkage of child care and maternity payments to childhood immu-nization. Vaccine, Jun 2; 22(17–18): 2345–50, 2004.

14. Volpp KG, Gurmankin Levy A, Asch DA, Berlin JA, Murphy JJ, Gomez A, Sox H, Zhu J, Lerman C. A randomized controlled trial of financial incentives for smoking cessation. Cancer Epidemiol Bio-markers Prev, Jan; 15(1): 12–8, 2006.

15. Higgins ST, Heil SH, Dantona R, Donham R, Matthews M, Badger GJ. Effects of varying the monetary value of voucher-based incentives on abstinence achieved during and following treatment among cocaine-dependent outpatients. Addiction, Feb; 102(2): 271–81, 2007.

16. Bagley SJ, Reynolds WW, Nelson RM. Is a “Wage-Payment” Model for Research Participation Appropriate for Children? Pediatrics, 119; 46–51, 2007.

17. Martinez-Ebers V. Using monetary incentives with hard-to-reach popu-lations in panel surveys. Int J Public Opinion Res, 9: 77–86, 1997.

18. Brealey SD. Improving response rates using a monetary incentive for patient completion of questionnaires: an observational study. BMC Med Res Methodol, 7:12, 2007.