Article Data

  • Views 691
  • Dowloads 165

Original Research

Open Access

Study of Stress Distribution and Displacement of the Maxillary Complex Following Application of Forces using Jackscrew and Nitanium Palatal Expander 2 – A Finite Element Study

  • Preeth Shetty1
  • Amitha M Hegde1,*,
  • Kavita Rai1

1Department of Pedodontics and Preventiven Children Dentistry, A.B. Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.34.1.dv5100j371184087 Vol.34,Issue 1,January 2010 pp.87-94

Published: 01 January 2010

*Corresponding Author(s): Amitha M Hegde E-mail: amipedo@yahoo.co.in preeth_s@rediffmail.com

Abstract

The stress distribution patterns within the maxillary complex during the expansion by slow maxillary expansion plate and Nitanium palate expander 2 was analyzed. Objective: This comparative study was done using a finite element model of a young maxillary bone. The model was generated using the data from computerized tomographic scans of a dried maxillary bone. The model was then strained to a dimensional pattern of displacement and stress distribution for the two appliances. Results: This present study showed the maximum lateral displacement for jack screw by 0.170mm at the region of cusp tips of posteriors indicating a tipping movement.Whereas NPE2, showed maximum displacement of 0.004mm corresponding to maxillary molars. Concentration of stress distribution ranging from 343.42 N/mm2 to 412.60 N/mm2 for 0.5mm of expansion was significantly depicted at the palatal bone beside the central incisors for jack screw, when compared to NPE2 which depicted low magnitude of stress ranging from 7.78 N/mm2 to 9.08 N/mm2 uniformly distributed along the midpalatal suture. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggests that NPE2 appliance basically an orthodontic appliance however is capable of producing mild to moderate orthopedic changes in maxilla.


Keywords

Finite element method (FEM), Stress distribution, Maxilla, NPE2, Jackscrew

Cite and Share

Preeth Shetty,Amitha M Hegde,Kavita Rai. Study of Stress Distribution and Displacement of the Maxillary Complex Following Application of Forces using Jackscrew and Nitanium Palatal Expander 2 – A Finite Element Study. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2010. 34(1);87-94.

References

1. Haas A. J. The treatment of maxillary deficiency by opening the mid-palatal suture. Angle Orthod, 35: 200–217, 1965.

2. Wertz RA. Skeletal and dental changes accompanying rapid mid-palatal suture opening. Am J Orthod, 58: 41–66, 1970.

3. Hicks EP. Slow maxillary expansion: A clinical study of the skeletal versus dental response to low magnitude force. Am J Orthod, 73: 121–141, 1978.

4. Thilander B, Wahlund S, Lannartsson B. The effect of early intercep-tive treatment in children with posterior cross-bite. Eur J Orthod, 6: 24–34, 1984.

5. Storey E. Tissue response to the movement of bones. Am J Orthod, 64: 229–247, 1973.

6. Haas AJ. Palatal expansion: Just the beginning of dentofacial orthope-dics. Am J Orthod, 57: 219–255, 1970.

7. Maurice C. Corbett Slow and continuous maxillary expansion, molar rotation, and molar distalization. J Clin Orthod, 31: 253–263, 1997.

8. Korioth T.W.P. and Versluis A. Modeling the mechanical behaviour of the jaws and their related structures by finite element (FE) analysis. Critical Review of Oral Biology & Medicine, 8: 90–104, 1997.

9. Alireza jafari et al. Study of stress distribution and displacement of var-ious craniofacial structures following application of Transverse ortho-pedic forces – A three dimensional FEM study. Angle Orthod, 73: 12–20, 2003.

10. Tanne K, Hiraga J, Kakiuchi K, Yamagata Y. Finite element analysis for stresses in the craniofacial sutures produced by maxillary protraction forces applied at the upper canines. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 95: 200–207, 1989.

11. Mitsuru Motoyoshi, Takahisa Shimazaki Stresses on the cervical col-umn associated with vertical occlusal alteration. Eur J Orthod, 25: 135–138, 2003.

12. Roxana Stegaroiu et al. Influence of prosthesis material on stress dis-tribution in bone and implant: A 3-Dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Maxillofac Implants, 13: 781–790, 1998.

13. Tanne K, Hiraga J, Kaiuchi K, Yamagata Y, Sakuda M. Biomechanical effect of anteriorly directed extraoral forces on the craniofacial com-plex: a study using the finite element method. Am. J. Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 95: 200–207, 1989.

14. Hiraga MJ, Tanne K, Nakamura S. Finite element analysis for stresses in the craniofacial sutures produced by maxillary protraction forces applied at the upper canines. Bri J Orthod, 21: 343–348, 1994.

15. Iseri H, Tekkaya AE, Oztan O, Bilgic S. Biomechanical effect of rapid maxillary expansion on the craniofacial skeleton, studied by the finite element method. Eur J Orthod, 20: 347–356, 1998.

16. Haas AJ. Rapid expansion of maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity by opening the midpalatal suture. Angle Orthod, 31: 73–90, 1961.

17. Timms DJ. A study of basal movement with rapid maxillary expansion. Am. J. Orthod, 77: 500–507, 1980.

18. Pavlin D, Vukicevic D. Mechanical suture opening – a normative study. Am. J. Orthod, 71: 367–381, 1977

19. Dahiya A, Maheshwari S, Gupta ND, Goyal S. Maxillary expansion –an interceptive modality in mixed dentition. J Indian society of pedodontics and preventive dentistry, 18(1): 24–26, 1999.

20. Chaconas SJ, Computo AA. Observation of orthopedic force distribu-tion utilizing maxillary orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod, 82: 492–501, 1982.

21. Wertz R, Dreskin M. Midpalatal suture opening. A normative study. Am J Orthod, 71: 367–381, 1977.

22. Christopher Ciambotti et al. A comparison of dental and dentoalveolar changes between rapid palatal expansion and nickel titanium palatal expansion appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 119: 11–20, 2001.

23. Karaman A. I. The effects of Nitanium maxillary expander appliance on dentofacial structures. Angle Orthod, 72: 344–354, 2002.

24. Virgillo F. ferrario et al. Quantitative effects of a nickel titanium palatal expander on skeletal and dental structures in the primary and mixed dentition – a preliminary study. Eur J Orthod, 25: 401–410, 2003.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top