Article Data

  • Views 632
  • Dowloads 167

Original Research

Open Access

Risk Indicators for Signs and Symptoms of Temporomandibular Dysfunction in Children

  • Luciano José Pereira1,*,
  • Rodrigo Campos Costa2
  • Julieta Petruceli França3
  • Stela Márcia Pereira4
  • Paula Midori Castelo5

1Centro Universitário de Lavras, Unilavras, MG, Brazil and Universidade Vale do Rio Verde, Unincor, Três Corações, MG, Brazil

2Centro Universitário de Lavras, Unilavras, MG, Brazil

3Postgraduate Program in Clincial Dentistry, Unincor, MG, Brazil

4Centro Universitário de Lavras, Unilavras, MG, Brazil and Universidade Vale do Rio Verde, Unincor, Três Corações, MG, Brazil

5Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Fop/Unicamp

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.34.1.l1773mh5pw2745g6 Vol.34,Issue 1,January 2010 pp.81-86

Published: 01 January 2010

*Corresponding Author(s): Luciano José Pereira E-mail: lucianojosepereira@yahoo.com.br

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the risk indicators for signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) in children between 4 and 12 years of age. Study Design: One hundred six patients were assessed for the following variables:(1) signs and symptoms of TMD (deviation when opening mouth, joint noises, limitation of movement, pain in the mandible or during movement), (2) dentition and occlusal abnormalities, and 3) habits (pacifier sucking, nonnutritive sucking, finger sucking, nail biting, and teeth grinding (bruxing). Multivariate logistic regression was performed with the level of significance set at P < 0.05. Results: The prevalence of at least one sign or symptom of TMD in the present sample was 12.26%(n = 13). Only bruxing (P = 0.01, odds ratio 6.08, CI 1.51–24.51) and posterior crossbite (P = 0.03, odds ratio 5.74, CI, 1.18–27.85) achieved statistical significance in the multivariate regression model and were considered risk indicators for signs and symptoms of TMD. Conclusions: Children with bruxing or clenching habits and those with posterior crossbite have a greater likelihood of developing signs and symptoms of TMD.

Keywords

temporomandibular dysfunction, children, habits, malocclusion

Cite and Share

Luciano José Pereira,Rodrigo Campos Costa,Julieta Petruceli França,Stela Márcia Pereira,Paula Midori Castelo. Risk Indicators for Signs and Symptoms of Temporomandibular Dysfunction in Children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2010. 34(1);81-86.

References

1. Mohl ND, Dixon DC. Current status of diagnostic procedures for tem-poromandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc, 125: 56–64, 1994.

2. Alamoudi N, Farsi N, Salako NO, Feteih R. Temporomandibular dis-orders among school children. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 22: 323–28, 1998.

3. Bonjardim LR, Gaviao MB, Carmagnani FG, Pereira LJ, Castelo PM. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular joint dysfunction in chil-dren with primary dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 28: 53–58, 2003.

4. Bonjardim LR, Gavião MB, Pereira LJ, Castelo PM, Garcia RC. Signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in adolescents. Braz Oral Res, 19: 93–98, 2005.

5. Castelo PM, Gavião MB, Pereira LJ, Bonjardim LR. Relationship between oral parafunctional/nutritive sucking habits and temporo-mandibular joint dysfunction in primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent, 15: 29–36, 2005.

6. Miller VJ, Bodner L. Temporomandibular joint dysfunction in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 38: 215–25, 1997.

7. Mohlin B, Ingervall B, Thilander B. Relation between malocclusion and mandibular dysfunction in Swedish men. Eur J Orthod, 2: 229–38, 1980.

8. Egermark-Eriksson I, Ingervall B, Carlsson GE. The dependence of mandibular dysfunction in children on functional and morphologic malocclusion. Am J Orthod, 83: 187–94, 1983.

9. Heikinheimo K, Salmi K, Myllärniemi S, Kirveskari P. A longitudinal study of occlusal interferences and signs of craniomandibular disorder at the ages of 12 and 15 years. Eur J Orthod, 12: 190–97, 1990.

10. Olsson M, Lindqvist B. Mandibular function before orthodontic treat-ment. Eur J Orthod, 14: 61–68, 1992.

11. Kitai N, Takada K, Yasuda Y, Verdonck A, Carels C. Pain and other car-dinal TMJ dysfunction symptoms: a longitudinal survey of Japanese female adolescents. J Oral Rehabil, 24: 741–48, 1997.

12. Hagag G, Yoshida K, Miura H. Occlusion, prosthodontic treatment, and temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Med Dent Sci, 47: 61–66, 2000.

13. Cheifetz AT, Osganian SK, Allred EN, Needleman HL. Prevalence of bruxism and associated correlates in children as reported by parents. J Dent Child, 72: 67–73, 2005.

14. Pereira LJ, Pereira-Cenci T, Del Bel Cury AA, Pereira SM, Ambrosano GMB, Pereira AC, et al. Psychological factors and temporomandibular disorders incidence in early adolescence. Braz Oral Res. In Press.

15. Thilander B, Rubio G, Pena L, de Mayorga C. Prevalence of temporo-mandibular dysfunction and its association with malocclusion in chil-dren and adolescents: an epidemiologic study related to specified stages of dental development. Angle Orthod, 72: 146–54, 2002.

16. Warren MP, Fried JL. Temporomandibular disorders and hormones in women. Cells Tissues Organs, 169: 187–92, 2001.

17. Meisler JG. Chronic pain conditions in women. J Womens Health, 8: 313–20, 1999.

18. Gesch D, Bernhardt O, Kirbschus A. Association of malocclusion and functional occlusion with temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in adults: a systematic review of population-based studies. Quintessence Int, 35: 211–21, 2004.

19. Gavião MBD, Raymundo VG, Sobrinho LC. Masticatory efficiency in children with primary dentition. Pediatr Dent, 23: 499–505, 2001.

20. Castelo PM, Gavião MB, Pereira LJ, Bonjardim LR. Masticatory mus-cle thickness, bite force, and occlusal contacts in young children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Eur J Orthod, 29: 149–56, 2007.

21. Kiliaridis S, Katsaros C, Raadsheer MC, Mahboubi PH. Bilateral mas-seter muscle thickness in growing individuals with unilateral crossbite [abstract 2831]. J Dent Res, 79: 497, 2000.

22. Kecik D, Kocadereli I, Saatci I. Evaluation of the treatment changes of functional posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131: 202–15, 2007.

23. Turasi B, Ari-Demirkaya A, Biren S. Comparison of increased overjet cases and controls: normative data for condylar positions. J Oral Rehabil, 34: 129–35, 2007.

24. Widmalm SE, Gunn SM, Christiansen RL, Hawley LM. Association between CMD signs and symptoms, oral parafunctions, race and sex, in 4-6-year-old African-American and Caucasian children. J Oral Rehabil, 22: 95–100, 1995.

25. Alamoudi N. Correlation between oral parafunction and temporo-mandibular disorders and emotional status among Saudi children. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 26: 71–80, 2001.

26. Gavish A, Halachmi M, Winocur E, Gazit E. Oral habits and their asso-ciation with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in adolescent girls. J Oral Rehabil, 27: 22–32, 2000.

27. Vanderas AP. Relationship between craniomandibular dysfunction and oral parafunctions in Caucasian children with and without unpleasant life events. J Oral Rehabil, 22: 289–94, 1995.

28. Vanderas AP, Menenakou M, Kouimtzis T, Papagiannoulis L. Urinary catecholamine levels and bruxism in children. J Oral Rehabil, 26: 103–10, 1999.

29. Barbosa TS, Miyakoda LS, Pocztaruk RL, Rocha CP, Gavião MB. Temporomandibular disorders and bruxism in childhood and adoles-cence: review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 72: 299–314, 2008.

30. Ramfjord SP. Bruxism, a clinical and electromyographic study. J Am Dent Assoc, 62: 21–44, 1961.

31. Rugh JD, Harlan J. Nocturnal bruxism and temporomandibular disor-ders. Adv Neurol, 49: 329–41, 1988.

32. Negoro T, Briggs J, Plesh O, Nielsen I, McNeill C, Miller AJ. Bruxing patterns in children compared to intercuspal clenching and chewing as assessed with dental models, electromyography, and incisor jaw trac-ing: preliminary study. ASDC J Dent Child, 65: 449–58, 438, 1998.

33. Magnusson T, Egermarki I, Carlsson GE. A prospective investigation over two decades on signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disor-ders and associated variables. A final summary. Acta Odontol Scand, 63: 99–109, 2005.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

PubMed (MEDLINE) PubMed comprises more than 35 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top