Article Data

  • Views 660
  • Dowloads 189

Original Research

Open Access

Timing of Myofunctional Appliance Therapy

  • Shishir Singh1,*,
  • Meghna Singh2
  • Ashish Saini2
  • Vaibhav Misra1
  • V P Sharma2
  • G K Singh2

1Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics.,Subharti Dental College, Meerut, India

2Chandra Dental College and Hospital Barabanki (U.P.), India.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.9572h13218806871 Vol.35,Issue 2,March 2011 pp.233-240

Published: 01 March 2011

*Corresponding Author(s): Shishir Singh E-mail: mail:drshishir2k@yahoo.com

Abstract

To identify the stage of skeletal maturity, as depicted by the Cervical Vertebrae Maturity Index at which the maximal response to myofunctional therapy could be expected. Design: The soft copies of pre and post treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of the sample comprising of 48 subjects, on myofunctional therapy, were traced on ‘Nemotec Dental Studio NX’software. Three groups were formed based on the stages of skeletal maturity and comparison was done. Results: The treated samples were compared with control samples consisting of subjects with untreated Class II malocclusions, also selected on the basis of stages in cervical vertebrae maturation. Inter-group comparison of the treated samples revealed statistically significant changes in Group II (Stages 3 to 4 of Cervical Vertebrae Maturity Index). Conclusion: Maximum response to myofunctional therapy can be expected in patients during the stages 3 to 4 of cervical vertebrae maturation index, i.e., during or slightly after the pubertal peak.

Keywords

Myofunctional appliance, Skeletal maturity, Cervical vertebrae Maturity Index (CVMI), Nemotec Dental Studio NX, Pubertal peak.

Cite and Share

Shishir Singh,Meghna Singh,Ashish Saini,Vaibhav Misra,V P Sharma,G K Singh. Timing of Myofunctional Appliance Therapy. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2011. 35(2);233-240.

References

1. Moss ML, and Salentijn. The primary role of functional matrices in facial growth. Am J Orthod, 55: 566–77, 1969.

2. Moss ML. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited 3: The genomic thesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,112: 338–342, 1997.

3. Bishara SE, Ziaja RR. Functional appliances: a review. Am J Orthod & Dentofacial Orthop, 95: 250–258, 1989.

4. Lund DI, Sandler PJ. The effects of twin blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113: 104–10, 1998.

5. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 114: 15–24, 1998.

6. Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment effects produced by the Twinblock appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 116: 597–609, 1999.

7 Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 118: 159–170, 2000.

8. Pancherz H, Hägg U. Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to somatic maturation Am J Orthod, 88: 273–87, 1985.

9. Malmgrem O, Ömblus J, Hägg U, Pancherz H. Treatment with an appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 91: 143–51, 1987.

10. Hägg U, Pancherz H. Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development: an analysis of 72 patients with Class II Div 1 malocclusion treated with Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod, 10: 169–76, 1988.

11. Faltin K, Faltin RM, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Ghiozzi B, Mcnamara JA Jr. Long-term effectiveness and treatment timing for Bionator therapy. Angle Orthod, 73: 221–30, 2003.

12. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopaedics. Semin Orthod, 11: 119–29, 2005.

13. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Jr. Mandibular changes produced by functional apliances in Class II maloccluson: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,129: 599.e1–12, 2006.

14. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Kim L H. Effect of Timing on the outcome of 1- phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 136: 501–9, 2009.

15. Björk A. The principle of the Andresen method of orthodontic treatment, a discussion based on the cephalometric x-ray analysis of treated cases. Am J Orthod, 37: 437–458, 1951.

16. Cohen AM. The timing of orthodontic treatment in relation to growth. Br J Orthod, 7: 69–74, 1980.

17. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J, Shaye R. Is it possible to modulate the growth of the human mandible with a functional appliance? Inter J Orthod, 29: 3–8, 1991.

18. Hunter CJ. The correlation of facial growth with body height and skeletal maturation at adolescence. Angle Orthod, 36: 44–54, 1966.

19. Bjork A. Timing of interceptive orthodontic measures based on stages of maturation. Trans Eur Orthod Soc, 23, 61–74, 1972.

20. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marubini E, Resele LF. The adolescent growth spurt of boys and girls of the Harpenden growth study. Ann Hum Biol, 3: 109–126, 1976.

21. Kopecky GR, Fishman LS. Timing of cervical headgear treatment based on skeletal maturation. Am J Orthod & Dentofacial Orthop, 104: 162–9, 1993.

22. Hassel B and Farman A. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod & Dentofacial Orthop, 107: 58–66, 1995.

23. Fudaleja P and Bollenb AM. Effectiveness of the cervical vertebral maturation method to predict postpeak circumpubertal growth of craniofacial structures Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137: 59–65, 2010.

24. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod, 83: 382–390, 1983.

25. Salzmann JA. Practice of Orthodontics, Philadelphia, Lippincott Co. 1974.

26. Thomas Rakosi. An atlas and manual of cephalometric radiography. Wolfe Medical Publications Ltd. 1979.

27. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA, Hunter WS. An Atlas of Craniofacial Growth. Monograph 2, Craniofacial Growth Series University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Mich 1974.

28. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for Orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg, 36: 269–277, 1978.

29. Lamparski D. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae (Thesis). Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, 1972.

30. O’Reilly M and Yanniello G. Mandibular growth changes and maturation of cervical vertebrae. Angle Orthod, 58: 179–184, 1988.

31. Clark WJ. Twinblock functional therapy: application in dentofacial orthodontics. Mosby-Wolfe Co. 1977.

32. Ahlgren J, Laurin C. Late results of activator-treatment: a cephalometric study. Br J Orthod, 3: 181–187, 1976.

33. McNamara J Jr, Bookstein, F and Shaughnessy J; Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy. Am J Orthod, 88: 91–110, 1985.

34. Patel HP, Moseley HC, Noar JH. Cephalometric determinants of successful functional appliance therapy. Angle Orthod, 72: 410–417, 2002.

35. Singh GD, Clark WJ. Soft tissue changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated using twin block appliances: finite-element study. Europ J Orthod, 25: 225–230, 2003.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

PubMed (MEDLINE) PubMed comprises more than 35 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top