Enamel Deproteinization before Acid Etching – A Scanning Electron Microscopic Observation

This study was undertaken to evaluate the topographical features of enamel surface deproteinized with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and etched with phosphoric acid (H3PO4) compared to phosphoric acid alone using Scanning Electron Microscopic (SEM) Analysis. Study Design: 30 enamel blocks of 1mm2 from ten human sound extracted permanent molars were obtained and treated as under: Group 1 (10 blocks): Enamel surface was etched with 37% H3PO4 gel for 15 seconds. Group 2 (10 blocks): Enamel surface was treated with 5.25% NaOCl for 60 seconds and then etched with 37% H3PO4 gel for 15 seconds. 10 enamel blocks were included in the control group where no treatment was carried out. The samples were subjected to SEM analysis and 5 microphotographs of each sample were obtained at 500X magnification and evaluated for the quality of etching pattern of the enamel in percentage (%) using Auto-CAD 2007 software. Results: Mean values of etching pattern in Group 1 being 55.76% and Group 2 being 53.58%. No significant difference was observed between the two groups. Conclusion: The use of 37% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds still remains the best method for pretreatment of enamel.

Enamel deproteinization, Acid etching, Sodium hypochlorite, Phosphoric acid

1. Guba CJ, Cochran MA, Swartz ML. The effect of varied etching and etching solution viscosity on bond strength and enamel morphology. Operative Dent, 19: 146–153, 1993.

2. Ohsawa T. Studies on solubility and adhesion of the enamel in pretreatment for caries preventive sealing. Bull Tokyo Dent, 1: 65–82, 1972.

3. Silverstone LM. The acid etch technique, an in vitro studies with special reference to the enamel surface and the enamel resin interface in Proceeding of an International Symposium on Acid etch technique eds Silverstone LM and Dogon IL, St. Paul M N. North Central publishing; 1974: 13–39.

4. Hobson RS, Rugg -Gunn AJ, Booth TA. Acid –etch patterns on the buccal surface of human permanent teeth. Arch Oral Biol, 47: 407–412, 2002.

5. Hobson RS, Crotty T, Thomson JM, Jepson NJ. A quantitative study of enamel acid etch patterns on surfaces used for retention of resin bonded fixed prostheses. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, Sep (13): 123–128, 2005.

6. Espinosa R, Valencia R, Uribe M, Ceja I, Saadia M. Enamel deproteinization and its effect on Acid Etching: An in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 33(1): 13–20, 2008.

7. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, 34: 849–853, 1955.

8. Gwinnett AJ, Matsui A. A study of enamel adhesives: The physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol, 12: 1615–1620, 1967.

9. Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol, 13: 61, 1968.

10. Asmussen E, de Araujo PA, Peutzfeldt A. In vitro bonding of resin to enamel and dentin: an update. Trans Acad Dent Mater, 2: 36, 1989.

11. Gwinnett AJ. Interactions of dental materials with enamel. Trans Acad Dent Mater, 3: 30, 1990.

12. Phillips RW. Skinner’s science of dental materials, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, p. 25, 1982.

13. Chow LC, Brown W.E. Phosphoric acid conditioning of teeth for pit and fissure sealents. J Dent Res, 50: 1517–1525, 1973.

14. Barkmeier WW, Gwinnett AJ, Shaffer SE. Effect of enamel etching time on bond strength and morphology. J Clin Orthod, 19: 36–38, 1985.

15. Nordenvall KJ, Brannnstrom M, Malmergren O. Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth. A comparison between 15 and 60 seconds of etching. Am J Orthod, 78: 99, 1980.

16. Swift EJ, Perdiago J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art 1995. Quintessence Int, 26: 95, 1995.

17. Silverstone LM, Saxton CA, Dogon IL, Fejerskov O. Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy. Caries Res, 9: 373–387, 1975.

18. Tagami J, Hosoa H, Fusayama T. Optimal technique of etching enamel. Oper Dent,13: 181, 1988.

19. Dakin HD. On the use of certain antiseptic substances in the treatment of infected wounds. Br Med J, 2: 318–320, 1915.

20. Crane AB. A predictable root canal technique. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, p. 69, 1920

21. Best M, Springthorpe VS, Sattar SA. Feasibility of a combined carrier test for disinfectants: studies with a mixture of five types of microorganisms. Am J Inf Cont, 22: 152–62, 1994.

22. Scott DB, Wyckoff RWG. Carbon surface replicas for electron microscopy and electron diffraction. JR Microsc Soc, 75: 217–222, 1955.