Article Data

  • Views 673
  • Dowloads 159

Original Research

Open Access

Effect of Ozone Pretreatment on the Microleakage of Pit and Fissure Sealants.

  • S Burcak Cehreli1,*,
  • Zeynep Yalcinkaya1
  • Gunseli Guven-Polat1
  • Zafer Cavit Çehreli1

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Baskent University Faculty of Dentistry, 11. sok No:26 06490, Bahcelievler, ANKARA, TURKEY.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.35.2.v2gn643k3774j014 Vol.35,Issue 2,March 2011 pp.187-190

Published: 01 March 2011

*Corresponding Author(s): S Burcak Cehreli E-mail: seviburcak@yahoo.com

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of ozone pretreatment on the microleakage and marginal integrity of pit and fissure sealants placed with or without a self-etch 6th generation adhesive. Study Design: Freshly-extracted, human third molars were randomly assigned into two main groups (n=48): Group A: Fissures were pretreated with ozone; Group B: Fissures were left untreated. The teeth were further randomly divided into two subgroups (n=24/each) so that half of teeth were sealed with a conventional fissure sealant (Fissurit F, Voco, Germany), while the remaining half received the same sealant bonded with a self-etch adhesive (Clearfil Protect Bond, Kuraray, Japan). Following thermal cycling (1000X), the specimens were subjected to dye penetration within 0.5% basic fuchsin for 24h. The extent of dye penetration was measured by image analysis. Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis of the data (p=0.05). Two randomly-selected sections from each group were observed under SEM. Results: In all groups, ozone pretreatment significantly reduced the extent of microleakage (p<0.001). SEM investigation demonstrated better adaptation of the sealants in ozone-pretreated groups. Clearfil Protect Bond did not improve the marginal seal of Fissurit F (p>0.05). Conclusion: Ozone pretreatment favorably affected the marginal sealing ability of the tested fissure sealants.

Keywords

Ozone, Fissure Sealant, Primary tooth, Microleakage, Dentin bonding agent

Cite and Share

S Burcak Cehreli,Zeynep Yalcinkaya,Gunseli Guven-Polat,Zafer Cavit Çehreli. Effect of Ozone Pretreatment on the Microleakage of Pit and Fissure Sealants.. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2011. 35(2);187-190.

References

1. Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Worthington H, Makela M. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2004; 3:CD001830.

2. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM. Epidemiology of dental caries in the pediatric and adolescent population: A review of past and current trends. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 18: 43–49, 1993.

3. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Smith CD, Williams JE, Sherrer JD, Mackert JR Jr, Richards EE, et al. Cariostatic and ultraconservative sealed restorations: Six-year results. Quintessence Int, 23: 827–38, 1992.

4. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of dental sealants after 15 years. J Am Dent Assoc, 122: 34–42, 1993.

5. Waggoner WF, Siegal M. Pit and fissure sealant application: Updating the technique. Quintessence Int, 127: 351–361, 1996.

6. Feigal RJ. The use of pit and fissure sealants. Pediatr Dent, 24: 415–22, 2002.

7. Ripa LW Sealants revisited: An update of the effectiveness of pit-andfissure sealants. Caries Res, 27: 77–82, 1993.

8. Simonsen RJ. Retention and effectiveness of a single application of white sealant after 10 years. J Am Dent Assoc, 115: 31–36, 1987.

9. Pardi V, Sinhoreti MA, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GM, Meneghim Mde C. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pitand-fissure sealants. Braz Dent J, 17: 49–52, 2006.

10. Azarpazhooh A, Limeback H. The application of ozone in dentistry: a systematic review of literature. J Dent, 36: 104–16, 2008.

11. Baysan A. and Lynch E. The use of ozone in dentistry and medicine. Prim Dent Care, 12: 47–52, 2005.

12. Baysan A. and Lynch E. The use of ozone in dentistry and medicine. Part 2. Ozone and root caries. Prim Dent Care, 13: 37–41, 2006.

13. Holmes J. Clinical reversal of root caries using ozone, double-blind, randomised, controlled 18-month trial. Gerodontology, 20: 106–114, 2003.

14. Nagayoshi M, Fukuizumi T, Kitamura C, Yano J, Terashita M, Nishihara T. Efficacy of ozone on survival and permeability of oral microorganisms. Oral Microbiology & Immunology, 19: 240, 2004.

15. Knight GM, McIntyre JM, Craig GG, Mulyani, Zilm PS. The inability of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus to form a biofilm in vitro on dentine pretreated with ozone. Aust Dent J, 53: 349–53, 2008.

16. Abu-Naba’a L. Management of primary occlusal pit and fissure caries using ozone. Belfast, UK: PhD Thesis, Queen’s University; 2003.

17. Huth KC, Paschos E, Brand K, Hickel R. Effect of ozone on non-cavitated fissure carious lesions in permanent molars: a controlled prospective clinical study. Am J Dent, 18: 223–8, 2005.

18. Dahnhardt JE, Jaeggi T, Lussi A. Treating open carious lesions in anxious children with ozone: a prospective controlled clinical study. Am J Dent, 19: 267–70, 2006.

19. Celiberti P, Pazera P, Lussi A. The impact of ozone treatment on enamel physical properties. Am J Dent, 19: 67–72, 2006.

20. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res, 69: 1652–8, 1990.

21. Manabe A, Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Hisamitsu H, Komatsu M. Effects of opacity and oxygen inhibition of coating resin composites on bond strength to enamel. Dent Mater J, 28: 552–7, 2009.

22. Duangthip D, Lussi A. Microleakage and penetration ability of resin sealant versus bonding system when applied following contamination. Pediatr Dent, 25: 505–511, 2003.

23. Cehreli ZC, Gungor HC. Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: results after fouryear water storage in vitro. J Adhes Dent, 10: 379–84, 2008.

24. Raskin A, Tassery H, D’hoore W, Gonthier S, Vreven J, Degrange M, Dejaou J. Influence of the number of specimens on reliability of in vitro microleakage evaluations. Am J Dent, 6: 207–210, 2003.

25. Osorio R, Toledano M, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Tay FR. Effect of load cycling and in vitro degradation on resin-dentin bonds using a self-etching primer. J Biomed Mater Res A, 72: 399–408, 2005.

26. Stamm T, Kaup M, Hohoff A, Meier T, Meyer U. Validity of a threedimensional public-domain system for contemporary endodontic research. J Endod, 29: 801–5, 2003.

27. Silverstone LM, Hicks MJ, Featherstone MJ. Oral fluid contamination of etched enamel surfaces: A SEM study. J Am Dent Assoc,110: 329–332, 1985.

28 Hitt JC, Feigal RJ. Use of a bonding agent to reduce sealant sensitivity to moisture contamination: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent,14: 41–46, 1992.

29. Feigal RJ, Musherure P, Gillespie B, Levy-Polack M, Quelhas I, Hebling J. Improved sealant retention with bonding agents: a clinical study of two-bottle and single-bottle systems. J Dent Res, 79: 1850–6, 2000.

30. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives Part II: Etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater, 17: 430–444, 2001.

31. Gillet D, Nancy J, Dupuis V, Dorignac G. Microleakage and penetration depth of three types of materials in fissure sealant: self-etching primer vs etching: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 26: 175–178, 2002.

32. Feigal RJ. and Quelhas I. Clinical trial of a self-etching adhesive for sealant application: success at 24 months with Prompt L-Pop. Am J Dent, 16: 249–51, 2003.

33. Hannig M, Grafe A, Atalay S, Bott B. Microleakage and SEM evaluation of fissure sealants placed by use of self-etching priming agents. J Dent, 32: 75–81, 2004.

34. Seemann R, Klück I, Bizhang M, Roulet JF. Secondary caries-like lesions at fissure sealings with Xeno III and Delton—an in vitro study. J Dent, 33: 443–449, 2005.

35. Dukić W, Dukić OL, Milardović S. The influence of Healozone on microleakage and fissure penetration of different sealing materials. Coll Antropol, 33: 157–62, 2009.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top