Reduction in Bacterial Loading Using 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate as an Irrigant in Pulpectomized Primary Teeth: A Preliminary Report

The aim of this study was to evaluate the reduction in bacterial loading using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate as an irrigating solution in pulpectomized primary teeth. Study design: A randomized, controlled clinical trial was performed that included primary teeth with pulp necrosis. Forty necrotic teeth were included, 20 irrigated with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (experimental group) and 20 with sterile saline solution (control group); in all cases, 2 microbiological samples from within the canals were taken with sterile paper points, the first after the canal opening and before the first irrigation, and the second after instrumentation and final irrigation, before filling. All samples were evaluated by McFarland’s scale. Results: The results were statistically analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test. After analyzing samples before and after irrigation in the control group (saline), we found a significant decrease of bacterial load (P <0.0002). The same occurred in the chlorhexidine group samples (P <0.0001). When both groups were compared postirrigation, a statistically significant difference was observed in favor of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate. Conclusion: Two percent chlorhexidine gluconate showed a greater reduction of intracanal bacterial loading compared with that observed with sterile saline solution. This irrigating solution is suggested as an alternative for pulpectomy of necrotic primary teeth.

Pulpectomy, chlorhexidine, irrigating solution, primary teeth, deciduous.

1. Onç ağ O, Hoşgö r M, Hilmioğlu S, Zekioğlu O, Eronat C, Burhanoğlu D. Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int Endod J, 36: 423–32, 2003.

2. Cohen S, Burns RC. “Las ví as de la Pulpa.” 8th ed. Madrid, Spain: Mosby, 254–59, 819–24, 2002.

3. Regan JD, Fleury AA. Irrigants in non-surgical endodontic treatment. J Ir Dent Assoc, 52: 84–92, 2006.

4. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod, 32: 389–98, 2006.

5. O’Riordan MW, Coll J. Pulpectomy procedure for deciduous teeth with severe pulpal necrosis. J Am Dent Assoc, 99: 480–82, 1979.

6. Thomas AM, Chandra S, Chandra S, Pandey RK. Elimination of infection in pulpectomized deciduous teeth: a short-term study using iodoform paste. J Endod, 20: 233–35, 1994.

7. Razi RS. Pulp therapy in the primary dentition. N Y State Dent J, 65: 18–22, 1999.

8. Goering AC, Camp JH. Root canal treatment in primary teeth: a review. Pediatr Dent, 5: 33–37, 1983.

9 Canoglu H, Tekcicek MU, Cehreli ZC. Comparison of conventional, rotary, and ultrasonic preparation, different final irrigation regimens, and 2 sealers in primary molar root canal therapy. Pediatr Dent, 28: 518–23, 2006.

10. Rifkin A. A simple, effective, safe technique for the root canal treatment of abscessed primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child, 47:435–41, 1980.

11. Guedes-Pinto AC, De Paiva JG, Bozzola JR. Tratamento endodô ntico de dentes decí duos com polpa mortificada. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent, 35: 240–44, 1981.

12. Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of an iodoform paste in root canal therapy for infected primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child, 54: 30–34, 1987.

13. Leonardo M, Bezerra L, Campos A. Tratamiento endodó ntico de dientes temporales con vitalidad pulpar (biopulpectomí a). In: Bezerra L, ed. Tratado de Odontopediatrí a. 1st ed. Caracas: Amolca, 632–37, 2008.

14. Mehdipour O, Kleier DJ, Averbach RE. Anatomy of sodium hypochlorite accidents. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2007: 544–46, 2007.

15. Tanomaru Filho M, Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Aní bal FF, Faccioli LH. Inflammatory response to different endodontic irrigating solutions. Int Endod J, 35: 735–39, 2002.

16. Leonardo MR, Tanomaru Filho M, Silva LA, Nelson Filho P, Bonifácio KC, Ito IY. In vivo antimicrobial activity of 2% chlorhexidine used as a root canal irrigating solution. J Endod, 25: 167–71, 1999.

17. Ryan S. Chlorhexidine as a canal irrigant: a review. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 31: 338–42, 2010.

18. Mohammadi Z, Abbott PV. The properties and applications of chlorhexidine in endodontics. Int Endod J, 42: 288–302, 2009.

19. Weber CD, McClanahan SB, Miller GA, Diener-West M, Johnson JD. The effect of passive ultrasonic activation of 2% chlorhexidine or 5.25% sodium hypochlorite irrigant on residual antimicrobial activity in root canals. J Endod, 29: 562–64, 2003.

20. Buck RA, Cai J, Eleazer PD, Staat RH, Hurst HE. Detoxification of endotoxin by endodontic irrigants and calcium hydroxide. J Endod, 27: 325–27, 2001.

21. Vianna ME, Gomes BP, Berber VB, Zaia AA, Ferraz CC, de SouzaFilho FJ. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 97: 79–84, 2004.

22. Lin S, Zuckerman O, Weiss EI, Mazor Y, Fuss Z. Antibacterial efficacy of a new chlorhexidine slow release device to disinfect dentinal tubules. J Endod, 29: 416–18, 2003.

23. Ercan E, Ozekinci T, Atakul F, Gü l K. Antibacterial activity of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite in infected root canal: in vivo study. J Endod, 30: 84–87, 2004.

24. Wang CS, Arnold RR, Trope M, Teixeira FB. Clinical efficiency of 2% chlorhexidine gel in reducing intracanal bacteria. J Endod, 33: 1283–89, 2007.

25. Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Assed S, Tanomaru Filho M. Histological study of the effect of some irrigating solutions on bacterial endotoxin in dogs. Braz Dent, J 15: 109–14, 2004.

26. Landis JR, Koch G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33: 159–74, 1977.

27. Carlsson J, Sundqvist G. Evaluation of methods of transport and cultivation of bacterial specimens from infected dental root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 49: 451–54, 1980.

28. Manzur A, Gonzalez AM, Pozos A, Silva-Herzog D, Friedman S. Bacterial quantification in teeth with apical periodontitis related to instrumentation and different intracanal medications: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod, 33: 114–18, 2007.

29. Siqueira JF Jr, Rô ç as IN. Catonella morbid and Granulicatella adiancens: new species in endodontic infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 102: 259–64, 2006.

30. McFarland J. The nephelometer: an instrument for estimating the number of bacteria in suspensions used for calculating the opsonic index and for vaccines. J Am Med Assoc, 49: 1176–78, 1907.

31. Koneman E, Allen S, Dowel V, Sommers H. Pruebas de susceptibilidad a los antimicrobianos. In: Koneman E, ed. Diagnó stico microbioló - gico. 6th ed. D.F Mexico: Panamericana, 380–93, 1992.

32. JMP-IN Version 4.0.1 (Academic) Copyright 1989–2000 SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC.

33. Gomes BP, Lilley JD, Drucker DB. Associations of endodontic symptoms and signs with particular combinations of specific bacteria. Int Endod J, 29: 69–75, 1996.

34. Pascon FM, Puppin-Rontani RM. The influence of cleansers on the permeability index of primary tooth root dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 3: 93–97, 2006.

35. Delany GM, Patterson SS, Miller CH, Newton CW. The effect of chlorhexidine gluconate irrigation on the root canal flora of freshly extracted necrotic teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 53: 518–23, 1982.

36. Jeansonne MJ, White RR. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod, 20: 276–78, 1994.

37. White RR, Hays GL, Janer LR. Residual antimicrobial activity after canal irrigation with chlorhexidine. J Endod, 23: 229–31, 1997.

38. Zamany A, Safavi K, Spå ngberg LS. The effect of chlohexidine as an endodontic disinfectant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 96: 578–81, 2003.

39. Carlsson J, Sunquist G. Evaluation of methods of transport and cultivation of bacterial specimens from infected dental root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 49: 451–54, 1980.

40. Evanov C, Liewehr F, Buxton TB, Joyce AP. Antibacterial efficacy of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine gluconate irrigants at 37 degrees C and 46 degrees C. J Endod, 30: 653–57, 2004.

41. Ng YL, Spratt D, Sriskantharajah S, Gulabivala K. Evaluation of protocols for field decontamination before bacterial sampling of root canals for contemporary microbiology techniques. J Endod, 29: 317–20, 2003.

42. Vianna ME, Horz HP, Gomes BP, Conrads G. In vivo evaluation of microbial reduction after chemo-mechanical preparation of human root canals containing necrotic pulp tissue. Int Endod J, 39: 484–92, 2006.

43. Siqueira JF Jr, Paiva SS, Rô ç as IN. Reduction in the cultivable bacterial populations in infected root canals by a chlorhexidine-based antimicrobial protocol. J Endod, 33: 541–47, 2007