Comparison of the Antibacterial Effect of Modified 3-mix Paste versus Ultrapex over Anaerobic Microorganisms from Infected Root Canals of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the antimicrobial efficacy of a modified 3-mix paste and to compare it with an iodoform paste (Ultrapex) against anaerobic microorganisms isolated from root canals of infected or necrotic primary teeth. Study design: An in vitro experimental assay was performed over isolated and identified anaerobic microorganisms of 21 samples, in order to compare the antimicrobial ability of both root canal filling materials, using a disc-diffusion method. Results: A total of 21 microbial samples (15 polymicrobial and 6 monomicrobial) were obtained, from which 19 different strains were identified. Modified 3-mix paste showed an excellent antimicrobial effect against most of both kinds of microbial samples, although some of them exhibited resistance; on the other hand, Ultrapex showed only minimal antimicrobial ability (null or low categories). Clostridium ramosum exhibited the most resistance to both materials. Conclusion: The bactericidal effect of the modified 3-mix paste was superior to Ultrapex, with a statistically significant difference, against anaerobic microorganisms isolated from infected root canals of primary teeth.

Modified 3-mix paste, Ultrapex, primary teeth, antimicrobial effect.

1. Mandel ID. Oral infections: Impact on human health, well-being, and health-care costs. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 25: 881–90, 2004.

2. Cox ST, Hembre JH, McKnight JP. The bactericidal potential of various endodontic materials for primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 45: 947–54, 1978.

3. Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, Fayle SA, Moffat MA. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry. Int J Paediatr Dent, 16 (Suppl 1): 15–23, 2006.

4. Fuks AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentition. Dent Clin North Am, 44: 571–96, 2000.

5. Tronstad L. Recent development in endodontic research. Scan J Dent Res, 100: 52–9, 1992.

6. Kubota K, Golden BE, Penugonda B. Root canal filling materials for primary teeth: A review of the literature. J Dent Child, 69: 93–7, 1992.

7. Silva LA, Leonardo MR, Oliveira DS, Silva RA, Queiroz AM, Hernández PG, Nelson-Filho P. Histopathological evaluation of root canal filling materials for primary teeth. Braz Dent J, 21: 38–45, 2010.

8. Nurko C, Garcia-Godoy N. Evaluation of a calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste (Vitapex®) in root canal therapy for primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 3: 289–93, 1999.

9. Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent, 14: 417–24, 2004.

10. Trairatvorakul C, Chunlasikaiwan S. Success of pulpectomy with zinc oxide-eugenol vs calcium hydroxide/iodoform paste in primary molars: A clinical study. Pediatr Dent, 30: 303–8, 2008.

11. Sato I, Kurihara-Ando N, Kota K, Iwaku M, Hoshino E. Sterilization of infected root-canal dentine by topical application of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline in situ. Int Endod J, 29: 118–24, 1996.

12. Hoshino E, Kurihara-Ando N, Sato I, Uematsu H, Sato M, Kota K, Iwaku M. In-vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline. Int Endod J, 29: 125–30, 1996.

13. Takushige T, Cruz EV, Asgor A, Hoshino E. Endodontic treatment of primary teeth using a combination of antibacterial drugs. Int Endod J, 37: 132–8, 2004.

14. Dahlen G. Microbiology and treatment of dental abscesses and periodontal-endodontic lesions. Periodontol 2000, 28: 206–39, 2002.

15. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J Clin Microbiol, 43: 5721–32, 2005.

16. Tomie-Karovie K, Jelinek E. Comparative study of the bacterial flora in the surroundings, the root canals and sockets of deciduous molars. Int Dent J, 21: 375–88, 1971.

17. Edwards S, Nord CE. Identification and characterization of microorganisms isolated from infected primary teeth. J Int Assoc Dent Child, 3: 15–8, 1972.

18. Manzur A, Gonzalez AM, Pozos AJ, Siva-Herzog D. Bacterial quantification in teeth with apical periodontitis related to instrumentation and different intracanal medications: A randomized clinical trial. J Endod, 33: 114–8, 2007.

19. Brook I. Microbiology and management of endodontic infections in children. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 28: 18–25, 2003.

20. Ledezma-Rasillo G, Flores-Reyes H, Gonzalez-Amaro AM, GarrochoRangel A, Ruiz-Rodríguez MS, Pozos-Guillen AJ. Identification of cultivable microorganisms from primary teeth with necrotic pulps. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 34: 329–34, 2010.

21. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 20: 340–9, 1965.

22. Siquieira JF Jr. Taxonomic changes of bacteria associated with endodontic infections. J Endod, 29: 619–23, 2003.

23. Reddy S, Ramakrishna Y. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials used in primary teeth: A microbiological study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 31: 193–9, 2007.

24. Tchaou WS, Turng BF, Minah G, Coll JA. In vitro inhibition of bacteria from root canals of primary teeth by various dental materials. Pediatr Dent, 17: 351–5, 1995.

25. Onçağ O, Hoşgör M, Hilmioğlu S, Zekioğlu O, Eronat C, Burhanoğlu D. Comparison of antibacterial and toxic effects of various root canal irrigants. Int Endod J 36: 423–32, 2003.

26. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 32: 389–98, 2006.

27. Ruiz-Esparza CL, Garrocho-Rangel A, Gonzalez-Amaro AM, FloresReyes H, Pozos-Guillen AJ. Reduction in bacterial loading using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate as an irrigant in pulpectomized deciduous teeth: A preliminary report. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35: 265–70, 2011.

28. Pabla T, Gulati MS, Mohan U. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal filling materials for primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 15: 134–40, 1997.

29. Önçaġ Ö, Gogulu D, Uzel A. Efficacy of various intracanal medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis in primary teeth: An in vivo study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 30: 233–6, 2006.

30. Tchaou WS, Turng BF, Minah G, Coll JA. Inhibition of pure cultures of oral bacteria by root canal filling materials. Pediatr Dent, 18: 444–9, 1996.

31. Barkhordar R. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity in vitro of ten root canal sealers on Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus mutans. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 68: 770–2, 1989.

32. Badr AE, Omar N, Badria FA. A laboratory evaluation of the antibacterial and cytotoxic effect of Liquorice when used as root canal medicament. Int Endod J, 44: 51–58, 2011.

33. Ribeiro CS, Scelza MF, Hirata Júnior R, Buarque de Oliveira LM. The antimicrobial activity of gray-colored mineral trioxide aggregate (GMTA) and white-colored MTA (WMTA) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 109: e109–12, 2010.

34. Sainulabdeen S, Neelakantan P, Ramesh S, Subbarao CV. Antibacterial activity of triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements—an in vitro pilot study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 35: 157–61, 2010.

35. Hollanda AC, Estrela CR, Decurcio Dde A, Silva JA, Estrela C. Sealing ability of three commercial resin-based endodontic sealers. Gen Dent, 57: 368–73, 2009.

36. Lin YH, Mickel AK, Chogle S. Effectiveness of selected materials against Enterococcus faecalis: part 3. The antibacterial effect of calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis. J Endod, 29: 565–66, 2003.

37. Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, Tanomaru Filho M, Bonifácio KC, Ito IY. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial activity of sealers and pastes used in endodontics. J Endod, 26: 391–4, 2000.

38. Siqueira JF Jr, de Uzeda M. Intracanal medicaments: evaluation of the antibacterial effects of chlorhexidine, metronidazole, and calcium hydroxide associated with three vehicles. J Endod, 23: 167–9, 1997.

39. Barbosa CA, Gonçalves RB, Siqueira JF Jr, De Uzeda M. Evaluation of the antibacterial activities of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine, and camphorated paramonochlorophenol as intracanal medicament. A clinical and laboratory study. J Endod, 23: 297–300, 1997.

40. Tobias RS. Antibacterial properties of dental restorative materials: a review. Int Endod J, 21: 155–60, 1988.

41. Siqueira JF Jr, Sen BH. Fungi in endodontic infections. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 97: 632–41, 2004.

42. Grossman LI. Antimicrobial effect of root canal cements. J Endod, 6: 594–7, 1980.