An in vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Primary Root Canal Filling Materials

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare six different materials commonly used for filling the root canals of primary teeth for antimicrobial efficacy against some of the microorganisms commonly found in infected root canals. Study design: In this experimental in vitro study six root canal filling materials were tested for antimicrobial efficacy against eight microbial strains using the agar diffusion method. Results: Zinc oxide eugenol paste exhibited the strongest antimicrobial potential followed by Endoflas™, zinc oxide-calcium hydroxide-sodium fluoride mixture, zinc oxide-calcium hydroxide mixture and calcium hydroxide paste (Apexcal™). The addition of sodium fluoride to the zinc oxide-calcium hydroxide mixture enhanced the antimicrobial efficacy. Metapex™ demonstrated minimal inhibition and Vaseline™ was non-inhibitory. Conclusions: All the test filling materials demonstrated varying antimicrobial activity against the microorganisms tested. Zinc oxide eugenol paste and materials containing zinc oxide were found to be more effective against the microorganisms compared to materials without zinc oxide.

antimicrobial efficacy, root filling materials, primary teeth

1. Neelakantan P, Subbarao CV. An analysis of the antimicrobial activity of ten root canal sealers - A duration based in vitro evaluation. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 33: 117–122, 2008.

2. Bystrom A,  Sundqvist  G.  Bacteriologic  evaluation  of  the  efficacy  of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res, 89: 321–328, 1981.

3. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5%sodium hypochlorite in endodontic therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 55: 307–312, 1983.

4. Pupo J, Biral RR, Benatti O, Abe A, Valdrighi L. Antimicrobial effects of  endodontic  filling  materials  on  microorganisms  from  root  canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 55: 622–627, 1983.

5. Goerig AC, Camp JH. Root canal treatment in primary teeth: A review. Pediatr Dent, 5: 33–37, 1983.

6. Tchaou WS, Turng BF, Minah GE, Coll JA. In vitro inhibition of bac-teria  from  root  canals  of  primary  teeth  by  various  dental  materials. Pediatr Dent, 17: 351–355, 1995.

7. Chawla  HS,  Mathur  VP,  Gauba  K,  Goyal  A.  A  mixture  of  calcium hydroxide paste and zinc oxide powder as a root canal filling material for primary teeth: A preliminary study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 19: 107–109, 2001.

8. Chawla HS, Setia S, Gupta N, Gauba K, Goyal A. Evaluation of a mix-ture of zinc oxide, calcium hydroxide, and sodium fluoride as a new root canal filling material for primary teeth. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 26: 53–58, 2008.

9. Reddy S, Ramakrishna Y. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of vari-ous root canal filling materials used in primary teeth: A microbiologi-cal study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 31: 193–198, 2007.

10. Amorim LdeF, Toledo OA, Estrela CRA, Decurcio DdeA, Estrela C. Antimicrobial  analysis  of  different  root  canal  filling  pastes  used  in pediatric  dentistry  by  two  experimental  methods.  Braz  Dent  J,  17: 317–322, 2006.

11. Praetzel JR, Ferreira FV, Weiss RN, Friedrich RS, Guedes-Pinto AC. Antimicrobial action of a filling paste used in pulp therapy in primary teeth  under  different  storage  conditions.  J  Clin  Pediatr  Dent,  33: 113–116, 2008.

12. Pabla T, Gulati MS, Mohan U. Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of various  root  canal  filling  materials  for  primary  teeth.  J  Indian  Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 15: 134–140, 1997.

13. Cox ST Jr, Hembree JH Jr, McKnight JP. The bactericidal potential of various  endodontic  materials  for  primary  teeth.  Oral  Surg  Oral  Med Oral Pathol, 45: 947–954, 1978.

14. Fuks AB, Eidelman E, Pauker N. Root fillings with Endoflas in primary teeth: A retrospective study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 27: 41–45, 2002.

15. da Silva LAB, Nelson-Filho P, Faria G, de Souza-Gugelmin MCM, Ito IY. Bacterial profile in primary teeth with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions. Braz Dent J, 17: 144–148, 2006.

16. Stuart  KG,  Miller  CH,  Brown  CE  Jr,  Newton  CW. The  com parative antimicrobial  effect  of  calcium  hydroxide.  Oral  Surg  Oral  Med  Oral Pathol, 72: 101–104, 1991.

17. Spicher  G,  Peters  J.  Suitability  of  Bacillus  subtilis  and  Bacillus stearothermophilus spores as test organism bioindicators for detecting superheating  of  steam.  Zentralbl  Hyg  Umweltmed,  199  :462–474, 1997.

18. Miles  RS, Amyes  SGB.  Laboratory  control  of  antimicrobial  therapy, Chapter 8. In: Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A, editors. Mackie  and  McCartney  Practical  Medical  Microbiology,  14th  ed. London: Churchill Livingstone, p. 151–178, 1996. 

19. Gomes BP, Pedroso JA, Jacinto RC, Vianna ME, Ferraz CC, Zaia AA, de Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of five root canal sealers. Braz Dent J, 15: 30–35, 2004. 

20. Bonow MLM, Guedes-Pinto AC, Bammann LL. Antimicrobial activity of  drugs  used  in  pulp  therapy  of  deciduous  teeth.  Braz  Endod  J,  1: 44–48, 1996. 

21. Tobias RS, Browne RM, Wilson CA. Antibacterial activity of dental restorative materials. Int Endod J, 18: 161–171, 1985. 

22. Orstavik D. Antibacterial properties of root canal sealers, cements and pastes. Int Endod J, 14: 125–133, 1981.

23. Hume  WR.  The  pharmacologic  and  toxicological  properties  of  zinc oxide-eugenol. J Am Dent Assoc, 113: 789–791, 1986.

24. Spencer  CG,  Campbell  PM,  Buschang  PH,  Cai  J,  Honeyman  AL. Antimicrobial effects of zinc oxide in an orthodontic bonding agent. Angle Orthod, 79: 317–322, 2009.

25. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T. Review on fluoride-releasing restora-tive materials-fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater, 23: 343–362, 2007.

26. Tchaou WS, Turng BF, Minah GE, Coll JA. Inhibition of pure cultures of  oral  bacteria  by  root  canal  filling  materials.  Pediatr  Dent,  18: 444–449, 1996.

27. al-Khatib ZZ, Baum RH, Morse DR, Yesilsoy C, Bhambhani S, Furst

ML.  The antimicrobial effect of various endodontic sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 70: 784–790, 1990. 

28. Stevens RH, Grossman LI. Evaluation of the antimicrobial potential of calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament. J Endod, 9: 372–374, 1983. 

29. Spangberg  LSW.  Intracanal  medication.  In:  Endodontics.  Ingle  JI, Bakland L, eds. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. p. 627–640, 1994.

30. Sathorn  C,  Parashos  P,  Messer  H.  Antibacterial  efficacy  of  calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J, 40: 2–10, 2007.

31. de  Rezende  GPS,  da  Costa  LRS,  Pimenta  FC,  Baroni  DA.  In-vitro antimicrobial activity of endodontic pastes with propolis extracts and calcium hydroxide: A preliminary study. Braz Dent J, 19: 301–305 

32. Ninomiya  J,  Sugawara  M,  Yamachika  K,  Nogame  K,  Yasuda  H, Okamoto H. Studies on antimicrobial activity of Vitapex in vitro. Jpn J Conserv Dent, 23: 625–630, 1980.

33. Seow WK. The effects of dyadic combinations of endodontic medica-ments  on  microbial  growth  inhibition.  Pediatr  Dent,  12:  292–297, 1990. 

34. Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent, 14: 417–424, 2004.

35. Nurko  C,  Garcia-Godoy  F.  Evaluation  of  a  calcium  hydroxide/iod-oform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 23: 289–294, 1999.

36. Pelczar  MJ  Jr,  Chan  ECS,  Krieg  NR.  Control  of  microorganisms  by chemical agents. In: Microbiology, 5th edition. Tata Mc Graw Hill, p. 494, 1998.

37. Gomes  BPFA,  Ferraz  CCR,  Garrido  FD,  Rosalen  PL,  Zaia  AA, Teixeira  FB,  de  Souza-Filho  FJ.  Microbial  susceptibility  to  calcium hydroxide pastes and their vehicles. J Endod, 28: 758–761, 2002.