Article Data

  • Views 863
  • Dowloads 164

Original Research

Open Access

Malocclusion: Social, Functional and Emotional Influence on Children

  • Martins-Júnior PA1
  • Marques LS2
  • Ramos-Jorge ML2,*,

1Pediatric Dentistry, Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri – UFVJM, Diamantina-MG, Brazil

2Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Federal University of Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri – UFVJM, Diamantina-MG, Brazil

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.37.1.y75430328427210j Vol.37,Issue 1,January 2013 pp.103-108

Published: 01 January 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): Ramos-Jorge ML E-mail: mlramosjorge@gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the association between types of malocclusion and quality of life in children between 8-10 years of age and establish correlations between the severity of the malocclusion and particular bio-psychosocial variables. Study design: The sample was made up of 102 schoolchildren aged 8-10 years. Clinical exams were performed using the criteria of the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) to determine the presence and severity of malocclusions. The impact on quality of life was assessed using the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ8-10). Statistical analysis involved the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Spearman's correlation analysis. Results: Malocclusions affected 61% of the children examined. There was a positive correlation between total CPQ8-10 and DAI scores (P = 0.034). The following types of malocclusion had a significant effect on the quality of life of the children: upper anterior irregularity ≥ 2 mm, anterior open bite ≥ 2mm and diastema ≥ 2mm. Children with malocclusion experienced a greater negative impact on quality of life in comparison to those without malocclusion. Conclusions: Malocclusions had a negative influence over the quality of life of children between 8-10 years of age. More severe malocclusions had a greater impact with regard to social, emotional and functional aspects.

Keywords

Oral health-related quality of life; malocclusion; children

Cite and Share

Martins-Júnior PA,Marques LS,Ramos-Jorge ML. Malocclusion: Social, Functional and Emotional Influence on Children. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2013. 37(1);103-108.

References

1. World Health Organization. Basic oral health surveys. Ed. Santos, São Paulo; p. 65, 1999.

2. Marques LS, Pordeus IA, Ramos-Jorge ML, Filogônio CA, Filogônio CB, Pereira LJ, Paiva SM. Factors associated with the desire for ortho-dontic treatment among Brazilian adolescents and their parents. BMC Oral Health, 9: 34, 2009.

3. Marques LS, Ramos-Jorge ML, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA. Malocclusion: Esthetic impact and quality of life among Brazilian schoolchildren. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129: 424–7, 2006.

4. Christopherson,  EA,  Briskie  D,  Ingleharte  MR.  Preadolescent  ortho-dontic treatment need: Objective and subjective provider assessments and patient self-reports. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 135: S80–6, 2009.

5. Marques  LS,  Filogônio  CA,  Filogônio  CB,  Pereira  LJ,  Pordeus  IA, Paiva SM, Ramos-Jorge ML. Aesthetic impact of malocclusion in the daily living of Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod, 36: 152–9, 2009.

6. Hassan AH, Amin  HES. Association  of  orthodontic  treatment  needs and  oral  health-related  quality  of  life  in  young  adults. Am  J  Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 137: 42–7, 2010.

7. Laing  E,  Cunningham  SJ,  Jones  S,  Moles  D,  Gille  D.  Psychosocial impact  of  hypodontia  in  children. Am  J  Orthod  Dentofacial  Orthop, 137: 35–41, 2010.

8. Locker D, Jokovic A, Prakash P, Tompson B. Oral health-related qual-ity of life of children with oligodontia. Int J Paediatr Dent, 20: 8–14, 2010.

9. Bernabé E, de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Condition-specific socioden-tal  impacts  attributed  to  different  anterior  occlusal  traits  in  Brazilian adolescents. Eur J Oral Sci, 115: 473–8, 2007.

10. Bernabé  E,  Sheiham  A,  Tsakos  G,  de  Oliveira  CM.  The  impact  of orthodontic treatment on the quality of life in adolescents: a case – con-trol study. Eur J Orthod, 30: 515–20, 2008.

11. Bernabé E, Sheiham A, de Oliveira CM. Condition-specific impacts on quality of life attributed to malocclusion by adolescents with normal occlusion  and  class  I,  II  and  II  malocclusion.  Angle  Orthod,  78: 977–82, 2008.

12. de  Paula-Junior  DF,  Santos  NCM,  Silva  ET,  Nunes  MF,  Leles  CR. Psychosocial impact of dental esthetics on quality of life in adolescents. Angle Orthod, 79: 1188–93, 2009.

13. Mtaya M, Astrom AN, Brudvik P. Malocclusion, psycho-social impacts and  treatment  need:  A  cross-sectional  study  of  Tanzanian  primary school-children. BMC Oral Health, 8: 14, 2008.

14. Liu Z, McGrath C, Hägg U. The impact of malocclusion/orthodontic treatment need on the quality of life: systematic review. Angle Orthod, 79: 585–91, 2009.

15. Tung AW, Kiyak HA. Psychological influences on the timing of ortho-dontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 113: 29–39, 1998.

16. Phillips C, Beal KNE. Self-concept and the perception of facial appear-ance in children and adolescents seeking orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod, 79: 12–16, 2009.

17. Carvior N, Lombardi DA. Developmental aspects of judgment of phys-ical attractiveness in children. Dev Psychol, 8: 67–71, 1973.

18. Bee  H.  Lifespan  Development.  Ed.  NY  Addison  Wesley  Longman, New York, 1998.

19. Hetherington  EM,  Parke  RD,  Locke  VO.  Child  Psychology:  A Contemporary  Viewpoint.  Ed.  The  McGraw-Hill  Companies  New York, 1999.

20. Barbosa  TS,  Tureli  MC,  Gavião  MB.  Validity  and  reliability  of  the Child Perceptions Questionnaires applied in Brazilian children. BMC Oral Health, 9: 13, 2009.

21. The Brazilian Economic Classification Criterion [http://www.abep.org]

22. Kirkwood BR, Stern J. Essentials of medical statistics. Ed. Blackwell, London, 2003.

23. Jokovic A, Locker D, Tompson B, Guyatt G. Questionnaire for mea-suring oral health-related quality of life in eight- to ten-year-old chil-dren. Pediatr Dent, 26: 512–8, 2004.

24. Jenny  J,  Cons  NC.  Guidelines  for  Using  the  DAI:  A  Supplementto DAI—The  Dental  Aesthetic  Index.  Iowa  City,  Iowa:  College  of Dentistry, University of Iowa; 1988.

25. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod, 31: 20–7, 2004.

26. Martins MT, Ferreira FM, Oliveira AC, Paiva SM, Vale MP, Allison PJ, et  al.  Preliminary  validation  of  the  Brazilian  version  of  the  Child Perceptions Questionnaire 8-10. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 10: 135–40, 2009.

27. Vallino LD, Tompson B. Perceptual characteristics of consonant errors associated with malocclusion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 51: 850–6, 1993.

28. Pahkala R, Laine T, Närhi M. Associations among different orofacial dysfunctions in 9-11-year-olds. Eur J Orthod, 17: 497–503, 1995.

29. Peres KG, Barros AJ, Anselmi L, Peres MA, Barros FC. Does maloc-clusion  influence  the  adolescent’s  satisfaction  with  appearance?  A cross-sectional  study  nested  in  a  Brazilian  birth  cohort.  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 36: 137–43, 2008.

30. Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod, 79: 399–415, 1981.

31. Shaw WC, Meek SC, Jones DS. Nicknames, teasing, harassment and the salience of dental features among school children. Br J Orthod, 7: 75–80, 1980.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top