Article Data

  • Views 2010
  • Dowloads 159

Original Research

Open Access

Deproteinization Treatment on Bond Strengths of Primary, Mature and Immature Permanent Tooth Enamel

  • Aras S1
  • Küçükeşmen C2
  • Küçükeşmen HC3
  • Şaroğlu Sönmez I4,*,

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ankara, Ankara, Turkey

2 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Süleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey

3Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Suleyman Demirel, Isparta, Turkey

4Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.37.3.252n428508q2w204 Vol.37,Issue 3,May 2013 pp.275-280

Published: 01 May 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): Şaroğlu Sönmez I E-mail: isilsaroglu@yahoo.com

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of pre-post deproteinization treatment with 5% sodium hypochloride on shear bond strength (sbs) of adhesive resin to primary, immature and mature permanent teeth enamel. Method: 30 teeth were used for each of primary, immature and mature permanent teeth groups. (totally 90). In control groups, enamel was etched for 60s with 37% phosphoric acid (3M) and rinsed for 10s (Procedure A). In experimental groups, deproteinization was applied with 5% NaOCI solution for 120s before (Procedure D+A) and after acid-etching (Procedure A+D). Gluma Comfort Bond (Heraeus-Kulzer) and Charisma (Heraeus-Kulzer) composite resin were applied to etched enamel surfaces. Data were determined with Two-Way ANOVA and LSD Multiple Comparison Test (p<0.05). Results: SBS was significantly lower in primary and immature permanent teeth than mature permanent teeth (p<0.05). “Procedure A+D” statistically increased sbs values in primary and immature permanent teeth (p<0.05). Conclusion: Deproteinization after acid etching significantly enhanced the shear bond strength values in primary and immature permanent teeth.

Keywords

Enamel maturation, deproteinization, bond strength, acid-etch technique.

Cite and Share

Aras S,Küçükeşmen C,Küçükeşmen HC,Şaroğlu Sönmez I. Deproteinization Treatment on Bond Strengths of Primary, Mature and Immature Permanent Tooth Enamel. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2013. 37(3);275-280.

References

1. Buonocore MGA. Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34(6):849-853, 1955.

2. Van Meerbeek B, Inouse S, Perdiago J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. A Contemporary Approach. Chicago: Quintessence, 178-235, 2001.

3. Knobloch LA, Meyer T, Kerby RE, Johnston W. Microleakage and bond strength of sealant to primary enamel comparing air abrasion and acid etch techniques, Pediatric Dent 27(6): 463-9, 2005.

4. Jenkins GN. The physiology and biochemistry of the mouth. Fourth ed. Oxford, London, Edingburg, Melbourne, Blackwell Scientific pub. 597, 1973.

5. Nordenvall KJ, Brännström M, Malmgren O. Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old permanent teeth. A comparison between 15 and 60 seconds of etching. Am J Orthod 78(1): 99-108, 1980.

6. Brudevold F, Aasenden R, Bakhos Y. A preliminary study of posteruptive maturation of teeth in situ. Caries Res 16: 243-8, 1982.

7. Kotsanos N, Darling AI. Influence of posteruptive age of enamel on its susceptibility to artificial caries. Caries Res 25: 241-50, 1991.

8. Sheen DH, Wang WN, Tarng TH. Bond strength of younger and older permanent teeth with various etching times. Angle Orthod 63(3): 225-230, 1993.

9. Hosoya Y. The effect of acid etching times on ground primary enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 15(3):188-194, 1991.

10. Gwinnett AJ, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of etching time and acid concentration on resin shear bond strength to primary tooth enamel. Am J Dent 5:237-239, 1992.

11. Hinding JH, Sveen OB. A scanning electron microscope study of the effects of acid conditioning on occlusal enamel of human permanent and deciduous teeth. Arch Oral Biol 19(7):573-576, 1974.

12. Atkins CO Jr, Rubenstein L, Avent M. Preliminary clinical evaluation of dentinal and enamel bonding in primary anterior teeth. J Pedod 10(3): 239-246, 1986.

13. Venezie RD, Vadiakas G, Christensen JR, Wright JT. Enamel pretreatment with sodium hypochlorite to enhance bonding in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta: case report and SEM analysis. Pediatr Dent 16(6): 433-436, 1994.

14. Saroglu I, Aras S, Oztas D. Effect of deproteinization on composite bond strength in hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta. Oral Diseases 12 (3): 305-308, 2006.

15. Aras Ş, Küçükeşmen Ç, Küçükeşmen HC. Influences of dental fluorosis and deproteinization treatment on shear bond strengths of composite restorations in permanent molar teeth. Fluoride 40(4): 290-291, 2007.

16. Perdigão J, Lopes M, Geraldeli S, Lopes GC, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 16 (5):311-323, 2000.

17. Espinosa R, Valencia R, Uribe M, Ceja I, Saadia M. Enamel deproteiniza - tion and its effect on acid etching: an in vitro study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 33(1): 13-20, 2008.

18. Espinosa R, Valencia R, Uribe M, Ceja I, Cruz J, Saadia M. Resin replica in enamel deproteinization and its effect on acid etching. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35(1): 47-52, 2010.

19. Bailleul-Forestier I, Molla M, Verloes A, Berdal A. The genetic basis of inherited anomalies of the teeth. Part 1: clinical and molecular aspects of nonsyndromic dental disorders. Eur J Med Genet 51:273-291, 2008.

20. Fejerskov O, Josephsen K, Nyvad B. Surface ultrastructure of unerupted mature human enamel. Caries Res 18:302-314, 1984.

21. Kodaka T, Kuroiwa M, Higashi S. Structural and distribution patterns of surface Prismless enamel in human permanent teeth. Caries Res 25 (1): 7-20, 1991.

22. Ahuja B, Yeluri R, Baliga SM, Munshi AK. Enamel deproteinization before acid etching a scanning electron microscopic observation. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35(2): 169-172, 2010.

23. Jumlongras D, White GE. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 21 (3): 223-229, 1997.

24. Salama FS, Tao L. Comparison of Gluma bond strength to primary vs. permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent 13 (3): 163-166, 1991.

25. Wright JT, Duggal MS, Robinson C et al. The mineral composition and enamel ultrastructure of hypocalcified amelogenesis imperfecta. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 13:117-126, 1993.

26. Bordin-Aykroyd S, Sefton J, Davies EH. In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. Dent Mater 8 (2): 74-78, 1992.

27. Asmussen E, Munksgaard EC. Bonding of restorative resins to dentin promoted by aqueous mixtures of aldehydes and active monomers. Int Dent J 35 (2):160-165, 1985.

28. Itoh J, Hashimoto K, Wakumoto S. Effect of Gluma concentration on adhe - sion to dentin. In: Bordin-Aykroyd S, Sefton J, Davies EH. In vitro bond strengths of three current dentin adhesives to primary and permanent teeth. Dent Mater 8(2):74-78, 1992.

29. Justus R, Cubero T, Ondarza R, Morales F. A new technique with sodium hypochlorite to increase bracket shear bond strength of fluoride releasing resin modified glass ionomer cements: comparing shear bond strength of two adhesive systems with enamel surface deproteinization before etching. Semin Orthod 16:66-75, 2010.

Submission Turnaround Time

Top