Article Data

  • Views 749
  • Dowloads 143

Original Research

Open Access

Biofilm Associated Microorganisms on Removable Oral Orthodontic Appliances in Children in the Mixed Dentition

  • Pathak A K1
  • Sharma D S1,*,

1Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Modern Dental College and Research Centre, Gandhi Nagar, Air Port Road, Indore (MP), India.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.37.3.92230h6256v8697t Vol.37,Issue 3,May 2013 pp.335-340

Published: 01 May 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): Sharma D S E-mail: drdivyassharma@gmail.com

Abstract

Biofilms on removable orthodontic appliances act as reservoir of microorganisms, capable of modifying the environmental condition of oral cavity and are difficult to be removed with routine hygiene measures. The present investigation includes enumeration, identification and numerical analysis of different types of cultivable bacteria associated with the biofilms on removable orthodontic appliances. Study design: Removable appliances of 25 healthy children among the ages of 10 to 14 years were taken to measure the prevalence of biofilms and type of microorganisms. For isolation of microorganism from biofilms different types of selective and non-selective medium based on standard methods were used. The data were further analysed by using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-sample t-test and Spearman rank correlation coefficient. The percentage frequencies of isolates were also calculated. Results : The survey revealed the presence of both multi-species and mono species biofilms on appliances, with Non-Streptococci, anaerobic bacteria, Streptococcus spp., members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and Lactobacillus spp. as a dominant microbial flora of biofilms. Bacilllus sp. and Candida sp. were isolated from one sample each. Significant positive and negative correlations were established among the species isolated from biofilms. Conclusion Higher prevalence of the members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were reported during this study, advocating an extra hygienic measure is essential for this age group while wearing acrylic orthodontic appliances in oral cavity.

Keywords

biofilms, orthodontic removable appliances, children, gingivitis.

Cite and Share

Pathak A K,Sharma D S. Biofilm Associated Microorganisms on Removable Oral Orthodontic Appliances in Children in the Mixed Dentition. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2013. 37(3);335-340.

References

1. Lau PYW, Wong RWK. Risks and complications in orthodontic treatment. Hong Kong Dent J; 3: 15-22. 2006.

2. Kaur R, Jain AK, Ansari A, Garg N. Potential Iatrogenic Responses to Orthodontic Treatment. JIDA; 5(1):109-111. 2011.

3. Bjerklin K, Gärskog B, Rönnerman A. Proximal caries increment in connection with orthodontic treatment with removable appliances. Br J Orthod. 1983 Jan; 10(1):21-4

4. Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE. Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J. Clin. Microbiol; 43, 5721–32. 2005.

5. Hibino K, Wong RW, Hagg U, Samaranayake LP. The effects of orthodontic appliances on Candida in the human mouth. Int. J. Paediatr. Dent 2009; 19:301-308.

6. Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Microbiol; 2, 95–108. 2004.

7. Pereira-Cenci T, Del Bel Cury AA, Crielaard W, Ten Cate JM. Development of Candida-associated denture stomatitis: new insights. J Appl Oral Sci ; 16:86-94. 2008.

8. Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Mukherjee PK, Hoyer LL, McCormick T, Ghannoum MA. Biofilm formation by the fungal pathogen Candida albicans: development, architecture, and drug resistance. J Bacteriol; 183:5385-94. 2001.

9. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol Rev; 15 (2): 167–193. 2002.

10. Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science; 284:1318–22. 1999.

11. Ramage G, Saville SP, Thomas DP, Lopez-Ribot JL. Candida biofilms: an update. Eukaryot Cell; 4:633-638. 2005.

12. Demling A, Elter C, Heidenblut T, Bach Fr-W, Hahn A, Schwestka-Polly R, Stiesch M, Heuer W. Reduction of biofilm on orthodontic brackets with the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene coating. Eur J Orthod; 32:414–418. 2010.

13. Batoni G, Pardini M, Giannotti A, Ota F, Giuca MR, Gabriele M, Campa M, Senesi S. Effect of removable orthodontic appliances on oral colonisation by mutans streptococci in children; 109(6):388-92. 2001.

14. Collee JG, Fraser AG, Marmion BP, Simmons A. Mackie and McCarteny Practical Medical Microbiology.14th. Ed. Charchil Livingstone. London; 1999.

15. Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt, E editors. The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria 3rd Ed. Springer Science. New York, USA, 2006; 6:5–1163. DOI: 10.1007/0-387-30746-X.

16. Forbes BA, Sahm, DF, Weissfeld, AS. Baily and Scott’s Diagnostic Micobiology. 11th. ed. USA: Mosby Publication; 2002.

17. Shin JH, Kee SJ, Shin MG, Kim SH, Shin DH, Lee SK, et al. Biofilm production by isolates of Candida species recovered from nonneutropenic patients: comparison of bloodstream isolates with isolates from other sources. J Clin. Microbiol.; 40:1244-8. 2002.

18. Dodge Y. The Concise Encyclopedia of Statistics. springer, Library of Congress Control; 2008.

19. Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, Van der Mei HC. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J Dent Res; 89: 657-665. 2010.

20. Paliy O, Agans R. Application of phylogenetic microarrays to interrogation of human microbiota. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2012; 79: 2–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01222.x

21. Casadevall A, Pirofski L. Virulence factors and their mechanisms of action: the view from damage–response framework. J. Water Health 2009; 7(Suppl. 1), S2–S18.

22. Kolenbrander PE. Intergeneric coaggregation among human oral bacteria and ecology of dental plaque. Annu. Rev Microbiol; 42, 627–656. 1988.

23. Conti S, Santos SSFdos, Koga-ito CY, Jorge AOC. Enterobacteriaceae and pseudomonadaceae on the dorsum of the human tongue. J Appl Oral Sci;17(5):375-80.2009.

24. Goldberg S, Cardash H, Browining H, Sahly H, Rosenberg M. Isolation of Enterobacteriaceae from the mouth and potential association with malodor. J Dent Res; 76:1770-5. 1997.

25. Tanner AC, Milgrom PM, Kent R Jr, Mokeem SA, Page RC, RiedyvCA, et al. The microbiota of young children from tooth and tongue samples. J Dent Res 2002; 81(10):53-7.

26. Sumi Y, Kogami H, Ohtsuka Y, Kakinoki Y, Haruguchi Y, Miyamoto H. High correlation between the bacterial species in denture plaque and pharyngeal microflora. Gerodontology; 20:84-7. 2003.

27. Hagg U, Kaveewatcharanont P, Samaranayake YH, Samaranayake LP. The effect of fixed orthodontic appliances on the oral carriage of Candida species and Enterobacteriaceae. Eur J Orthod; 26:623-629. 2004.

28. Bakker DP, Postmus BR, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC. Bacterial strains isolated from different niches can exhibit different patterns of adhesion to substrata. Appl Environ Microbiol; 70:3758e3760. 2004.

29. Lindsay D, Holy A von. Bacterial biofilms within the clinical setting: what healthcare professionals should know. J Hosp Infect; 64, 313-325 .2006.

30. Naranjo AA, Trivino ML, Jaramillo A, Betancourth M, Botero JE. Changes in the subgingival microbiota and periodontal parameters before and 3 months after bracket placement. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop;130:275 e217-275 e222. 2006.

31.Preza D, Olsen I, Aas JA, Willumsen T, Grinde B, Paster BJ. Bacterial profiles of root caries in elderly patients. J Clin Microbiol; 46:2015-21. 2008.

32. Mills SE, Lauderdale PW, Mayhew RB. Reduction of microbial contamination in dental units with povidone-iodine 10%. JADA; 113:280–284. 1986.

33. Souli M, Giamarellou H. Effects of slime produced by clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci on activities of various antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother1998; 42:939–941.

34. El-Solh AA, Pietrantoni C, Bhat A, Okada M, Zambon J, Aquilina A, et al. Colonization of dental plaques: a reservoir of respiratory pathogens for hospital-acquired pneumonia in institutionalized elders. Chest; 126(5):1575-82. 2004.

35. Joyanes P, Pascual A, Martinez-Martinez L, Hevia A, Perea EJ. In vitro adherence of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium to plastic biomaterials. Clin Microbiol Infect; 5:382–386. 1999.

36. Moore WEC, Holdeman LV, Cato EP, Smibert RM, Burmeister JA, Ranney RR. Bacteriology of moderate (chronic) periodontitis in mature adult humans. Infect Immun.; 42:510–515. 1983.

37. Gu F, Lux R, Du-Thumm L, Stokes I, Kreth J, Anderson MH, Wong DT, Wolinsky L, Sullivan R, Shi W. In situ and non-invasive detection of specific bacterial species in oral biofilms using fluorescently labelled monoclonal antibodies. J Microbiological Methods; 62:145-160. 2005.

38. Silverman RJ, Nobbs AH, Vickerman MM, Barbour ME, Jenkinson HF. Interaction of Candida albicanscell-wall Als3 protein with Streptococcus gordonii SspB adhesin promotes development of mixed species communities. Infect Immun; IAI. 00685-10. 2010.

39. Oudiz RJ, Widlitz A, Beckmann XJ, Camanga D, Alfie J, Brundage BH, Barst RJ. Micrococcus-associated central venous catheter infection in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest. 126:90-94. 2004.

40. Koll-Klais P, Mandar R, Leibur E, Marcotte H, Hammarstrom L, Mikelsaar M. Oral lactobacilli in chronic periodontitis and periodontal health: species composition and antimicrobial activity. Oral Microbiol Immunol; 20(6): 354-61. 2005.

41. Simark-Mattsson C, Emilson CG, Hakansson EG, Jacobsson C, Roos K, Holm S. Lactobacillus-mediated interference of mutans streptococci in caries-free vs caries-active subjects. Eur J Oral Sci; 115(4): 308-14. 2007.

42. Yli-Knuuttila H, Snall J, Kari K, Meurman JH. Colonization of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the oral cavity. Oral Microbiol Immunol; 21(2): 129-131. 2006.

43. Nase L, Hatakka K, Savilahti E, Saxelin M, Ponka A, Poussa T, Korpela R, Meurman JH. Effect of long term consumption of a probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, in milk on dental caries and caries risk in children. Caries Res; 35:412–420. 2001.

44. Jones SE, Versalovic J. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri biofilms produce antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory factors. BMC Microbiology; 9:35 doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-35.2009.

45. Ishikawa H, Aiba Y, Nakanishi M, Oh-Haashi Y, Koga Y. Suppression of periodontal pathogenic bacteria in the saliva of human by the administration of lactobacillus salivarius. J Jap Soc Periodontol; 45: 105-112. 2003.

46. Daniluk T, Fiedoruk K, Ściepuk M, Zaremba ML, Rozkiewicz D, Cylwik-Rokicka D et al. Aerobic bacteria in the oral cavity of patients with removable dentures. Advances in Medical Sciences; 51(Suppl. 1): 86-90. 2006.

47. Nasidze I, Li J, Quinque D, Tang K, Stoneking M. Global diversity in the human salivary microbiome. Genome Res; 19: 636–643. 2009.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

PubMed (MEDLINE) PubMed comprises more than 35 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top