Article Data

  • Views 719
  • Dowloads 160

Original Research

Open Access

Impact of Socio-Cultural Practice of Infant/Young Child Gum Lancing during Teething

  • Olabu BO1,*,
  • Okoro DO1
  • Thigiti JM1
  • Oramisi VA1

1Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O.Box 30197 – 00100GPO, Nairobi, Kenya.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.37.4.l86784137776p346 Vol.37,Issue 4,July 2013 pp.355-359

Published: 01 July 2013

*Corresponding Author(s): Olabu BO E-mail:


Fever and diarrhea are among the common morbidities that do occur during infancy and are sometimes wrongly associated with teething by the community. Some societies practice gum lancing, ordinarily referred to as gum cutting, as a remedy for the “teething diarrhoea”. These myths have a potential of giving false security with the belief that these symptoms are part of the teething process, and so medical attention may not be sought when necessary. There are few studies focusing on the outcome of such practices despite their known potential dangers. Objective: To describe various methods of gum lancing and clinical presentation, management and outcome of gum lancing among the Akamba people as seen in Kangundo District Hospital. Method: One hundred and fifteen infants/children who were brought to the hospital with a positive history of gum lancing. Results: The common presenting complaints were persistent diarrhoea (74.0%), fever (44.3%), difficulty in breathing (27.8%) and refusal to feed (20.9%). 58.3% cases warranted admission and these included severe dehydration and shock (47.8%), severe and very severe pneumonia (40.3%), meningitis (26.9%) and generalized sepsis (17.9%). There were a total of 7 mortalities (6.1%), 3 on arrival and 4 within the pediatric ward. Invasive gum lancing procedures and delayed seeking of medical attention were associated with severe disease and poorer outcomes. Conclusion: The impact of gum lancing is of both a public health and economic significance. It is associated with unfavorable outcome if prompt measures are not put in place. There is need to conduct community sensitization and educate caregivers on the truths of teething and dangers of gum lancing as well as seeking health services for fever and diarrhoea. Use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and adequate rehydration are necessary in management of the victims.


Gum lancing, teething, children

Cite and Share

Olabu BO,Okoro DO,Thigiti JM,Oramisi VA. Impact of Socio-Cultural Practice of Infant/Young Child Gum Lancing during Teething. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2013. 37(4);355-359.


1. Jones M. Teething in children and the alleviation of symptoms. J Fam Health Care 12(1):12-13, 2002.

2. McIntyre GT, McIntyre GM. Teething troubles? Br Dent J 192(5): 251-255, 2002.

3. DenBesten P. Is teething associated with diarrhea? West J Med 173:137, 2000.

4. Feldens CA, Faraco IM, Ottoni AB, Feldens EG, Vítolo MR. Teething symptoms in the first year of life and associated factors: a cohort study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 34(3): 201-206, 2010.

5. Denloye O, Bankole OO, Aderinokun GA. Teething myths among commu - nity health officers. Odontostomatol Trop 28(109):19-22, 2005.

6. Guthrie L. Teething. BMJ ii:468, 1908.

7. Jaber L, Cohen I J, Mor A. Fever associated with teething. Arch Dis Child 67(2):233–234, 1992.

8. Oziegbe EO, Folayan MO, Adekoya-Sofowora CA, Esan TA, Owotade FJ. Teething problems and parental beliefs in Nigeria. J Contemp Dent Pract 10(4):75-82, 2009.

9. Coreil J, Price L, Barkey N. Recognition and management of teething diar - rhea among Florida pediatricians. ClinPediatr (Phila) 34:591-598, 1995.

10. Sood S, Sood M. Teething: myths and facts. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35(1):9- 13, 2010.

11. Adimora GN, Ubesie AC, Chinawa JM. Mothers’ Beliefs about Infant Teething in Enugu, South-east Nigeria: a cross sectional study. BMC Res Notes 4(1):228, 2011.

12. TEC Jr. On the importance of lancing the teething infant’s gums, as viewed in 1857, Pediatrics 67:135, 1981.

13. Hurlock J. A Practical Treatise upon Dentition or, the Breeding of Teeth in Children. London, C Rimington& Austen S, J Hodges, 1942

14. Owais AI, Zawaideh F, Bataineh O. Challenging parents’ myths regarding their children’s teething. Int J Dent Hyg 2010; 8(1):28-34.

15. Teething Myths. BMJ 1975; iv: 604.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time