Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of the Carious Dentin Before and After Application of Papacarie Gel

Objective: To evaluate clinically and microbiologically the efficacy of Papacarie® in the removal of carious dentin in both permanent and primary teeth. Study design: Thirty permanent and primary molars with dentinal carious lesions were excavated and subjected to clinical and microbiological assessment before and after application of Papacarie®. The gel was further tested for in vitro antimicrobial efficacy against standard cariogenic micro-organisms using agar diffusion assay. Results: Papacarie® was able to differentiate between infected and affected dentin clinically along with high patient comfort during caries excavation. The mean time taken for caries removal and restoration was observed to be 4.17 ± 0.40 min. and 8.57 ± 0.45 min. for permanent teeth and 4.21 ± 0.36 min. and 9.24 ± 0.58 min. for primary teeth. There was a significant reduction in the total viable colony forming units from the dentin samples before and after application of Papacarie®. It was also observed that Papacarie® had no inhibitory effect on standard cariogenic microorganisms in the agar diffusion assay. Conclusions: Papacarie® is an effective caries removal method clinically in both permanent and primary teeth. The number of viable microorganisms after complete caries excavation using Papacarie® still appears to be high and this bacterial count should be tackled by a suitable restorative material with potent antimicrobial activity

Chemo-Mechanical, Caries, Papacarie, children

1. Motta LJ, Martins MD, Porta KP, Bussadori SK. Aesthetic restoration of deciduous anterior teeth after removal of carious tissue with Papacarie®. Ind J Dent Res, 20(1):117-120,2009.

2. Lula ECO, Monteiro-Neto V, Alves CMC, Ribeiro CCC. Microbiological Analysis after Complete or Partial Removal of Carious Dentin in Primary Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Caries Res, 43:354–358,2009.

3. Bussadori SK, Castro LC, Galvao AC. Papin gel: A new Chemo mechanical Caries removal agent. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 30:115-119,2005.

4. Munshi AK, Hegde AM, Shetty PK. Clinical Evaluation of CarisolvTM in the Chemomechanical removal of carious dentin. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 26(1):49-54,2001.

5. Subramaniam P, Girish Babu KL, Neeraja G. Comparison of the Antimicro-bial Efficacy of Chemomechanical caries removal (CarisolvTM) with that of conventional drilling in reducing cariogenic flora. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 32(3):215-219,2008.

6. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health, 13:227-236,1990.

7. Wong DL, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML. Wong’s Essentials of Pediatric Nursing ed. 6th St. Louis, p. 1301,2001.

8. Mary Ann Zacharia, Munshi AK. Microbiological assessment of dentin stained with a caries detector dye. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 19(2): 111-115, 1995.

9. Miles AA, Mishra SS. Textbook of Practical Medical Microbiology. Mackie and Mc Cartney, 13th edition, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1989.

10. Bauer AW, Kirby WMM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol, 45:493-6, 1966.

11. Lalitha MK. Manual on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (under the auspices of Indian Association of Medical Microbiologists), p. 7-20,2004.

12. Murdoch-Kinch CA, Mclean ME. Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc, 134(1):87-95,2003.

13. Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries excavation: a review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J, 188(9):476- 482,2000.

14. Green RM, Green A. Adult attitude to dentistry among dental attenders in South Wales. Br Dent J, 159: 157-160,1985.

15. Kent GG, Blinkhorn AS. Psychology of dental care. Wright Butterworth Heineman, Oxford,1991.

16. Forgione AG, Clark RE. Comments on empirical study of the causes of dental fears. J Dent Res, 53:496,1974

17. Klepac RK, Dowling J, Hauge G. Characteristics of clients seeking therapy for reduction of dental avoidance: Reactions to pain. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatr, 13:293-300,1982.

18. Abdelnur JP, Cerqueira DF, Castro GF, Maia LC, de Souza IP. Strategies for addressing restorative challenges in HIV-infected children. J Dent Child, 75(1):69-73,2008.

19. Mohamed RSK, Abdella Ahmed AAH, Kateb MAE, Mahmoud AA. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 34(2):117-23, 2009.

20. Jawa D, Singh S, Somani R, Jaidka S, Sirkar K, Jaidka R. Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal agent (Papacarie®) and conventional method of caries removal: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prevent Dent, 28(2):73-77,2010.

21. Kochhar GK, Srivastava N, Pandit IK, Gugnani N, Gupta M. An evaluation of different caries removal techniques in primary teeth: A comparative clin-ical study. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 36(1):5-9,2011.

22. Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. The use of caries detector dye during cavity preparation: A microbiological assessment. Br Dent J, 174:245-248,1993.

23. Fusayama T. Clinical guide for removing caries using a caries detecting solution. Quintessence Int, 19:397-401,1988.

24. Ferrari JCL, Motisuki C, Bortoletto CC, Santos-Pinto L. Efficiency of Papacarie® in the chemo-mechanical carious dentine removal. Rev Bras Odontol, 62(3 and 4):209-211,2005.

25. Kakaboura A, Masouras C, Staikou O, Vougiouklakis G. A comparative clinical study on the Carisolv caries removal method. Quintessence Int, 34(4):269-271,2003.

26. Chourio MAL, Zambrano O, Gonzalez H, Quero M. Clinical randomized controlled trial of chemomechanical caries removal (CarisolvTM). Int J Pediatr Dent, 16(3):161-167,2006.

27. Carrillo CM, Tanaka MH, Cesar MF, Camargo MA, Juliano Y, Novo NF. Use of papain gel in disabled patients. J Dent Child, 75(3): 222-228,2008.

28. Bergmann J, Leitao J, Kultze C, Bergmann D, Clode MJ. Removing dentine caries in deciduous teeth with Carisolv: a randomized, controlled, prospective study with 6 months follow-up, comparing chemomechanical treatment with drilling. Oral Health Prev Dent, 3(2):105-111,2005.

29. Inglehart MR, Peters MC, Flamenbaum MH, Eboda NN, Feigal RJ. Chemomechanical caries removal in children: An operator’s and pediatric patients’ responses. J Am Dent Assoc, 138(1):47-55,2007.

30. Azrak B, Callaway A, Grundheber A, Stender E, Willershausen B. Compar-ison of the efficacy of chemomechanical caries removal (Carisolv) with that of conventional excavation in reducing the cariogenic flora. Int J Pediatr Dent, 14(3):182-191,2004.

31. El-Tekeya M, El-Habashy L, Mokhles N, El-Kimary E. Effectiveness of 2 chemomechanical caries removal methods on residual bacteria in dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent, 34(4):325-30,2012

32. Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. Microbiological validation of assessments of caries activity during cavity preparation. Caries Res, 27:402-408,1993.

33. Kidd EAM. Caries removal and the pulpo-dentinal complex. Dent Update, 27:476-482,2000.

34. Lager A, Thornqvist E, Ericson D. Cultivatable bacteria in dentine after caries excavation using rose-bur or CarisolvTM. Caries Res, 37: 206-211, 2003.

35. Kidd EAM, Ricketts DNJ, Beighton D. Criteria for caries removal at the enamel-dentine junction: a clinical and microbiological study. Br Dent J, 180:287-291,1996.

36. Heinrich R, Kneist S, Kunzel W. Klinisch kontrollierte Untersuchung zur Caries-profunda-Therapie am Milchmolaren. Deutsche Zahnarztliche Zeitschrift, 46: 581-584,1991.

37. Bjorndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res, 31:411-417,1997.

38. Hoshino E. Predominant obligate anaerobes in human carious dentine. J Dent Res, 64:1195-1198,1985.