Article Data

  • Views 1025
  • Dowloads 134

Original Research

Open Access

Utilization of Emergency Services for Non-Traumatic Dental Disease

  • Da Silva K1
  • Kunzel C2
  • Yoon RK3,*,

1Private Practice in Etobicoke, Toronto, Canada

2Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City

3Division of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York City

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.38.2.9tu312x044451348 Vol.38,Issue 2,March 2014 pp.107-112

Published: 01 March 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): Yoon RK E-mail: rky1@columbia.edu

Abstract

Purpose: To identify and characterize children who utilize emergency dental services for non-traumatic dental disease. Study design: Caregivers of children under 12 years old who seek out emergency services for the treatment of non-traumatic dental disease will be surveyed regarding their child's current oral health status. Patient's clinical data will be obtained and they will be further followed for a period of 2 months to determine if they follow-up with recommendations for comprehensive dental care. Results: One hundred and ninety-eight people participated in the study (97% response rate). Eighty-three percent of the children were diagnosed with dental caries. Seventy-four percent of patients of record presented with an emergency at least once before and 73% had a history of one or more broken appointments. Patients with a history of previous emergency visits (OR=3.45, CI=2.05, 5.81) or a history of missed appointments (OR=2.21, CI=1.42, 3.58) were significantly more likely to fail to return for comprehensive care (P<.01). Conclusion: This study shows that those who utilize emergency services more than once, or have a history of missed appointments are more likely to continue to utilize emergency dental services as their primary means for dental care.

Keywords

childhood, dental, caries, emergency

Cite and Share

Da Silva K,Kunzel C,Yoon RK. Utilization of Emergency Services for Non-Traumatic Dental Disease. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2014. 38(2);107-112.

References

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Oral health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. J Calif Dent Assoc 28: 685-95, 2000.

2. Beltran-Aguilar ED, Barker LK, Canto MT, Dye BA, Gooch BF, Griffin SO, et al. Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis-United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2002. MMWR Surveillance summaries: Morbidity and mortality weekly report Surveillance summaries CDC 54:1-43, 2005.

3. Edelstein B, Vargas CM, Candelaria D, Vemuri M. Experience and policy implications of children presenting with dental emergencies to US pediatric dentistry training programs. Pediatr Dent 28: 431-7, 2006.

4. Cohen LA, Harris SL, Bonito AJ, Manski RJ, Macek MD, Edwards RR, et al. Coping with toothache pain: a qualitative study of low-income persons and minorities. J Public Health Dent 67: 28-35, 2007.

5. Lewis C, Mouradian W, Slayton R, Williams A. Dental insurance and its impact on preventive dental care visits for U.S. children. J Am Dent Assoc 138: 369-80, 2007.

6. Lewis CW, Johnston BD, Linsenmeyar KA, Williams A, Mouradian W. Preventive dental care for children in the United States: a national perspec-tive. Pediatrics 119:e544-53, 2007.

7. Mouradian WE, Wehr E, Crall JJ. Disparities in children’s oral health and access to dental care. JAMA 284: 2625-31, 2000.

8. US Department of Health and Human Services. Office of the Inspector General: Children’s dental services under Medicaid: Access and Utiliza-tion. San Francisco, CA 1996.

9. Lewis CW, Nowak AJ. Stretching the safety net too far waiting times for dental treatment. Pediatr Dent 24: 6-10, 2002.

10. Macek MD, Edelstein BL, Manski RJ. An analysis of dental visits in U.S. children, by category of service and sociodemographic factors, 1996. Pediatr Dent 23: 383-9, 2001.

11. Rowley ST, Sheller B, Williams BJ, Mancl L. Utilization of a hospital for treatment of pediatric dental emergencies. Pediatr Dent 28: 10-7, 2006.

12. Powers LJ, Grana JR, Keen ND, Hanchak NA. Preventive service utiliza-tion as a predictor for emergency dental examinations. Community Dent Health 17: 20-3, 2000.

13. Agostini FG, Flaitz CM, Hicks MJ. Dental emergencies in a universi-ty-based pediatric dentistry postgraduate outpatient clinic: a retrospective study. J Dent Child 68: 316-21, 2001.

14. Cohen LA, Magder LS, Manski RJ, Mullins CD. Hospital admissions asso-ciated with non-traumatic dental emergencies in a Medicaid population. Am J Emerg Med 21: 540-4, 2003.

15. Ladrillo TE, Hobdell MH, Caviness AC. Increasing prevalence of emer-gency department visits for pediatric dental care, 1997-2001. J Am Dent Assoc 137: 379-85, 2006.

16. Lewis C, Lynch H, Johnston B. Dental complaints in emergency depart-ments: a national perspective. Ann Emerg Med 42: 93-9, 2003.

17. Battenhouse MA, Nazif MM, Zullo T. Emergency care in pediatric dentistry. J Dent Child 55: 68-71, 1998.

18. Cohen LA, Manski RJ, Hooper FJ. Does the elimination of Medicaid reim-bursement affect the frequency of emergency department dental visits? J Am Dent Assoc 127: 605-9, 1996.

19. Graham DB, Webb MD, Seale NS. Pediatric emergency room visits for non-traumatic dental disease. Pediatr Dent 22: 134-40, 2000.

20. Quinby DJ, Sheller B, Williams BJ, Grembowski D. Parent satisfaction with emergency dental treatment at a children’s hospital. J Dent Child 71: 17- 23, 2004.

21. Dervin JV, Stone DL, Beck CH. The no-show patient in the model family practice unit. J Fam Pract 7: 1177-80, 1978.

22. Hertz P, Stamps PL. Appointment-keeping behavior re-evaluated. Am J Public Health 67: 1033-6, 1977.

23. DiStasio JG. The occurrence of “no show” appointments among Medicaid and private dental patients. J Mass Dent Soc 18: 82-4, 1969.

24. Iben P, Kanellis MJ, Warren J. Appointment-keeping behavior of Medic-aid-enrolled pediatric dental patients in eastern Iowa. Pediatr Dent 22: 325- 9, 2000.

25. O’Brien G, Lazebnik R. Telephone call reminders and attendance in an adolescent clinic. Pediatrics 101: E6, 1998.

26. Christensen AA, Lugo RA, Yamashiro DK. The effect of confirmation calls on appointment-keeping behavior of patients in a children’s hospital dental clinic. Pediatr Dent 23: 495-8, 2001.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 1.8 (2023) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top