Article Data

  • Views 788
  • Dowloads 186

Original Research

Open Access

Shear-Bond Strength of a New Self-Adhering Flowable Restorative Material to Dentin of Primary Molars

  • Pacifici E1
  • Chazine M2
  • Vichi A2,*,
  • Grandini S2
  • Goracci C2
  • Ferrari M2

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Unit of Paediatric Dentistry, “Sapienza” University of Rome

2Department of Dental Materials and Fixed Prosthodontics of the University of Siena, Tuscan School of Dental Medicine, University of Firenze and Siena, Italy

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.38.2.l3q5l3128k2870j7 Vol.38,Issue 2,March 2014 pp.149-154

Published: 01 March 2014

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength to dentin of primary molars of a new self-adhering flowable resin composite with two ionomer-based cements and one flowable resin composite in combination with two different adhesive systems. Study design: Fifty primary molars were grinded on the occlusal surface to obtain flat dentin substrate and randomly divided into 5 groups (n=10): OFL:Phosphoric Acid/Optibond FL/Premise Flow; OAO:Optibond All-In-One/Premise Flowable; II:Polyacrylic Acid/Fuji II; IX:Polyacrylic Acid/Fuji IX; V:Vertise Flow. Cylinders (3mm diameter – 5mm height) of restorative material were built-up in three increments over the dentin surfaces. A shear load was applied until failure. Bond strength values were statistically analysed with Kruskall-Wallis ANOVA followed by Dunn's test (P<.05). Differences in failure mode distribution were assessed with Chi-square (P<.05). Results: OFL and OAO recorded significantly higher bond strengths than the other groups. Adhesive failures were evident in all groups except OFL and OAO, in which also cohesive failures in dentin were observed. Conclusions: Vertise Flow established on primary dentin bond strengths values similar to those of glass ionomer cements routinely used for restorations of primary teeth. The combination of flowable resin with etch-and-rinse or all-in-one adhesives obtained higher bond strength values, thus involving a more complex handling.

Keywords

Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Bonding, Composite resin, Glass Ionomer Cements

Cite and Share

Pacifici E,Chazine M,Vichi A,Grandini S,Goracci C,Ferrari M. Shear-Bond Strength of a New Self-Adhering Flowable Restorative Material to Dentin of Primary Molars. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2014. 38(2);149-154.

References

1. Baghdadi ZD. In vitro bonding efficacy of three restorative materials to primary dentin using a one-bottle adhesive system. Gen Dent;49(6):624- 31. 2001.

2. da Costa CC, Oshima HM, Costa Filho LC. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study. Gen Dent;56(1):85-93.2008.

3. Shimada Y, Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y, Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent;27(4):403-9. 2002.

4. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc;131:20-5. 2000.

5. Perdigão J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitão J, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent;10(3):141-6. 1997

6. Yaseen SM, Subba Reddy VV. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of two self-etching adhesives (sixth and seventh generation) on dentin of primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent ;27(1):33-8. 2009.

7. Haller B. Recent developments in dentin bonding. Am J Dent. 2000 Feb;13(1):44-50.

8. Daronch M, De Goes MF, Grande RH, Chan DC. Antibacterial and conven-tional self-etching primer system: Morphological evaluation of intact primary enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent;27:251-256. 2003.

9. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J;132:133–135. 1972.

10. Mitra SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res;70(1):72-4. 1991.

11. Somphone P, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Enhanced bond strengths of compomers using two dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent ;15(5):325-9. 2002.

12. ISO/TS 11405:2003 (E): Dental materials-testing of adhesion to tooth structure. 2nd ed. ; 2003.

13. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry. Oper Dent; 6: 119-144. 2001.

14. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent; 28: 215-235. 2003.

15. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J; 24: 1-13. 2005.

16. Nagakane K, Yoshida Y, Hirata I, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Shirai K, Ogawa T, Suzuki K, Van Meerbeek B, Okazaki M. Analysis of chemical interaction of 4-MET with hydroxyapatite using XPS. Dent Mater J;25(4):645-9. 2006.

17. Cardoso MV, Delmé KI, Mine A, Neves Ade A, Coutinho E, De Moor RJ, Van Meerbeek B. Towards a better understanding of the adhesion mecha-nism of resin-modified glass-ionomers by bonding to differently prepared dentin. J Dent;38(11):921-9. 2010.

18. Knight GM, McIntyre JM, Craig GG, Mulyani. Electron probe microanal-ysis of ion exchange of selected elements between dentine and adhesive restorative materials. Aust Dent J;52(2):128-32. 2007.

19. Mitra SB, Lee CY, Bui HT, Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP. Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer. Dent Mater; 25(4):459-66. 2009.

20. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Adhesive restorative materials: a review. Aust Dent J;49:112-121. 2004.

21. Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Interdiffusion of a traditional glass ionomer cement into conditioned dentin. Am J Dent. 1997 Dec;10(6):295-7. Erratum in: Am J Dent 1998 Feb;11(1):28.

22. Vichi A, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical study of the self-adhering flowable composite resin Vertise Flow in Class I restorations: six-month follow-up. Int Dent SA.;12(1):14-23. 2010.

23. Burrow MF, Nopnakeepong U, Phrukkanon S. A comparison of microten-sile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin. Dent Mater;18(3):239-45. 2002.

24. Krifka S, Börzsönyi A, Koch A, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Friedl KH. Bond strength of adhesive systems to dentin and enamel--human vs. bovine primary teeth in vitro. Dent Mater;24(7):888-94. 2008.

25. Uekusa S, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Kurokawa H, Hosoya Y. Bonding efficacy of single-step self-etch systems to sound primary and permanent tooth dentin. Oper Dent;31(5):569-76. 2006.

26. Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Marshall GW Jr, Goto G. Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin. J Dent ;29(3):163-71. 2001.

27. Courson F, Bouter D, Ruse ND, Degrange M. Bond strengths of nine current dentine adhesive systems to primary and permanent teeth. J Oral Rehabil;32(4):296-303. 2005.

28. Hosoya Y, Kawashita Y, Marshall GW Jr, Goto G. Influence of Carisolv for resin adhesion to sound human primary dentin and young permanent dentin. J Dent;29(3):163-71. 2001.

29. Sumikawa DA, Marshall GW, Gee L, Marshall SJ. Microstructure of primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent;21(7):439-44. 1999.

30. de Araujo FB, García-Godoy F, Issáo M. A comparison of three resin bonding agents to primary tooth dentin. Pediatr Dent ;19(4):253-7. 1997.

31. Asakawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Inoue M, Hisamitu H, Sasa R. Efficacy of dentin adhesives in primary and permanent teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent;25(3):231-6. 2001.

32. Manuja N, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Nagpal R. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various esthetic restorative materials to dentin: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent ;29(1):7-13. 2011.

33. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Leal SC, Oliveira LB, Bezerra AC, Bönecker M. Absence of carious lesions at margins of glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations: a meta- analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent;10(1):41-6. 2009.

34. Marshall SJ, Bayne SC, Baier R, Tomsia AP, Marshall GW. A review of adhesion science. Dent Mater;26(2):e11-6. 2010.

35. Aguilar-Mendoza JA, Rosales-Leal JI, Rodríguez-Valverde MA, González-López S, Cabrerizo-Vílchez MA. Wettability and bonding of self-etching dental adhesives. Influence of the smear layer. Dent Mater;24(7):994-1000. 2008.

36. Grégoire G, Dabsie F, Dieng-Sarr F, Akon B, Sharrock P. Solvent composition of one-step self-etch adhesives and dentine wettability. J Dent.;39(1):30-9. 2011.

37. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc;129(5):567-77. 1998.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

PubMed (MEDLINE) PubMed comprises more than 35 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top