Comparison of Relative Efficacy of Two Techniques of Enamel Stain Removal on Fluorosed Teeth. An in Vivo Study

The present study was conducted to compare and evaluate the relative efficacy of enamel microabrasion (using 18% HCl) and bleaching with McInnes solution in the esthetic improvement of fluorosed teeth and to check postoperative sensitivity. Study design: 30 children aged between 9-14yrs with a mild or moderate grade of fluorosis as classified according to Dean’s fluorosis index and who complained of objectionable esthetics were selected. Split mouth study design was selected in our study. Each subject had one of their maxillary central incisor randomly selected for Enamel microabrasion and the contra lateral maxillary central incisor for McInnes bleaching. Esthetic improvement was assessed by comparing the pre and postoperative digital photographs. During the evaluation session, the pre and postoperative photographs of 30 subjects were incorporated into a power point presentation and were projected side by side in a darkened room. Four calibrated and blinded examiners, including a layman rated the photographs under standardized viewing conditions. Esthetic improvement was assessed for both short and long term improvement. The postoperative sensitivity was recorded for both the procedures immediately after treatment and at one, three and six months intervals. Results: The results proved that both immediate and long term (6month) esthetic improvement achieved by McInnes bleaching were superior to enamel microabrasion. There is a reduction in aesthetics of teeth in both the procedures after six months, which was very minimal in McInnes procedure and significant in enamel micro abrasion. Postoperative sensitivity in both techniques were negligible. The sensitivity observed were transient and subsided within an one-month post operatively. None of the subjects reported sensitivity at one, three and six months intervals. Conclusion: McInnes bleaching is a better procedure compared to enamel microabrasion in improving the appearance of fluorosed teeth. Both techniques are conservative and safe.

Enamel micro abrasion, McInnes bleaching, Esthetic Improvement.

1. Colon PG Jr . Improving the appearance of severely flurosed teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 86(6) :1329-31. 1973.

2. Beiley RW, Christen AG. Effect of a bleaching technique on the labial enamel of human teeth stained with endemic dental fluorosis. J Dent Res; 49(1):168-170. 1970.

3. Train TE, McWhorter AG, Seale NS, Wilson CF, Guo IY. Examination of esthetic improvement and surface alteration following microabrasion in fluorotic human incisors in vivo. ;18(5):353-62. 1996

4. Grossman LI, Seymour O,Carlos ED, Endodontic Practice, Philadel - phia,Lea & farbiger,11th ed. 276-271.1991.

5. Price RB, Loney RW, Doyle MG, Moulding MB. An evaluation of a tech - nique to remove stains from teeth using micro abrasion ; J.Am.Dent Assoc. Aug;134(8)1066-71. 2003.

6. Giniger M, Macdonald J, Ziemba S, Felix H. The clinical performance of professionally dispensed bleaching gel with added amorphous calcium phosphate. J Am Dent Assoc.; Mar;136(3):383-92. 2005.

7. Sowinski J, Ayad F, Petrone M, DeVizio W, Volpe A, Ellwood R, Davies R.comparative investigation of the desensitizing efficacy of new denti - frice..J.Clin.Periodontol.: 28(11):1032-36. 2001.

8. Limeback H, Vieira AP, Lawrence H. Improving esthetically objectionable human enamel fluorosis with a simple microabrasion technique. Eur J Oral Sci.May;114 Suppl 1:123-6; discussion 127-9, 380. 2006.

9. Wong FS, Winter GB. Effectiveness of microabrasion technique for improvement of dental aesthetics. Br Dent J.10;193(3):155-8. 2002.

10. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Enamel color modification by controlled hydro - chloric acid-pumice abrasion. I. Technique and examples. Quintessence Int.Feb;17(2):81-7. 1986.

11. Donly KJ, Donly AS, Baharloo L, Rojas-Candelas E, Garcia-Godoy F, Zhou X, Gerlach RW. Tooth whitening in children. Compend Contin Educ Dent. Jan;23(1A):22-8; quiz 49. 2002.

12. Ashkenazi M, Sarnat H. Microabrasion of teeth with discoloration resem - bling hypomaturation enamel defects: four-year follow up. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 25(1):29-34. 2000

13. Baumgartner JC, Reid DE, Pickett AB. Human pulpal reaction to the modi - fied McInnes bleaching technique. J Endod. Dec;9(12):527-9.1983.

14. Coll JA, Jackson P, Strassler HE. Comparison of enamel microabrasion techniques: Prema Compound versus 12-fluted finishing bur. J Esthet Dent. SepOct;3(5):180-6. 1991.

15. Creig PA,Effects of solutions used to treat dental fluorosis on permeability of teeth. J Endod.;3(4):139-43. 1977.

16. Croll TP; Enamel microabrasion: The technique. Quintessence Int.20(6).395-400. 1989.