Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 692
  • Dowloads 134

Original Research

Open Access

Prevalence and Characteristics of Non-Syndromic Orofacial Clefts and the Influence of Consanguinity

  • Alamoudi NM1,*,
  • Sabbagh H J1
  • Innes NPT2
  • El Derwi D1
  • Hanno AZ1
  • Al-Aama JY1
  • Habiballah A H1
  • Mossey P A2

1Preventive Dental Sciences Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

2University of Dundee University Dental School 1Park Place Dundee, DD1 4HR Scotland, UK.

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.38.3.bm4m2158v17p2535 Vol.38,Issue 3,April 2014 pp.241-246

Published: 01 April 2014

*Corresponding Author(s): Alamoudi NM E-mail: nalamoudi2011@gmail.com

PDF (381.21 kB) View Full-text

Abstract

The Objective of this study was to identify the prevalence and describe the characteristics of non-syndromic orofacial cleft (NSOFC) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and examine the influence of consanguinity. Study Design: Six hospitals were selected to represent Jeddah’s five municipal districts. New born infants with NSOFC born between 1st of January 2010 to 31st of December 2011 were clinically examined and their number compared to the total number of infants born in these hospitals to calculate the prevalence of NSOFC types and sub-phenotypes. Referred Infants were included for the purpose of studying NSOFC characteristics and their relationship to consanguinity. Information on NSOFC infants was gathered through parents’ interviews, infants’ files and patient examinations. Results: Prospective surveillance of births resulted in identifying 37 NSOFC infants born between 1st of January 2010 to 31st of December 2011 giving a birth prevalence of 0.80/1000 living births. The total infants seen, including referred cases, were 79 children. Consanguinity among parents of cleft palate (CP) cases was statistically higher than that among cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) patients (P=0.039). Although there appears to be a trend in the relationship between consanguinity and severity of CL/P sub-phenotype, it was not statistically significant (P= 0.248). Conclusions: Birth prevalence of NSOFC in Jeddah City was 0.8/1000 live births with CL/P: 0.68/1000 and CP: 0.13/1000. Both figures were low compared to the global birth prevalence (NSOFC: 1.25/1000, CL/P: 0.94/1000 and CP: 0.31/1000 live births). Consanguineous parents were statistically higher among CP cases than among other NSOFC phenotypes.

Keywords

Prevalence, Saudi Arabia, cleft lip, Cleft palate, orofacial cleft, consanguinity

Cite and Share

Alamoudi NM,Sabbagh H J,Innes NPT,El Derwi D,Hanno AZ,Al-Aama JY,Habiballah A H,Mossey P A. Prevalence and Characteristics of Non-Syndromic Orofacial Clefts and the Influence of Consanguinity. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2014. 38(3);241-246.

URL:

https://www.jocpd.com/articles/10.17796/jcpd.38.3.bm4m2158v17p2535

References

1. Mossey P. Report of WHO Registry meeting on craniofacial Anomalies. 2001 ed. Brazil: WHO; 2001.

2. Christensen K, Juel K, Herskind AM, Murray JC. Long term follow up study of survival associated with cleft lip and palate at birth. Brit Med J; 328(7453):1405-6. 2004.

3. Mossey PA, Little J, Munger RG, Dixon MJ, Shaw WC. Cleft lip and palate. The Lancet ;374(9703):1773-85. 2009.

4. Mossey P, Modell B. Epedemiology of oral clefts 2012: An international perspective. In: MT C, editor. Cleft lip and palate epidemiology, aetiology and treatment: Front Oral Biol, Basel, Karger. 1-18. 2012.

5. Mossey P, Little J. Epidemiology of oral clefts: an international perspective. F WD, editor: Oxford University Press, 2002.

6. Pritchard DJ, Korf BR. Medical genetics at a glance. 2nd ed. ed. Malden, Mass, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2008.

7. Al-Johar A, Ravichandran K, Subhani S. Pattern of cleft lip and palate in hospital-based population in Saudi Arabia: Retrospective study. Cleft Palate-Craniof J;45(6):592-6. 2008.

8. Al Omari F, Al-Omari IK. Cleft lip and palate in Jordan: Birth prevalence rate. Cleft Palate-Craniof J;41(6):609-12. 2004.

9. Aqrabawi HE. Facial cleft and associated anomalies: Incidence among infants at a Jordanian medical centre. Eastern Mediterranean Health J;14(2):356-9. 2008.

10. Borkar AS. Epidemiology of facial clefts in the central province of Saudi Arabia. Brit J Plastic Surgery;46(8):673-5. 1993.

11. Kumar P, Hussain MT, Cardoso E, Hawary MB, Hassanain J. Facial clefts in Saudi Arabia: An epidemiologic analysis in 179 patients. Plastic and Reconstructive Surg; 88(6):955-8. 1991.

12. Rajab A, Thomas C. Oral clefts in the Sultanate of Oman. Eu J Plastic Surgery.;24(5):230-3. 2001.

13. Ministry of Health. Statistical report of the Ministry of Health. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: The Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia, Statistics Department MoHSA, 2010.

14. Kriens O. Philadelphia:Documentation of cleft lip, alveolus, and palate. In: Bardach J, Morris HL, eds. Multidisciplinary Management of Cleft Lip and Palate. WB Saunders,:127-133. 1990.

15. Sabbagh HJ, Mossey PA, Innes NPT. Prevalence of orofacial clefts in Saudi Arabia and neighboring countries: A systematic review. Saudi Dent J.;24(1):3-10. 2012.

16. El-Hazmi MAF, Al-Swailem AR, Warsy AS, Al-Swailem AM, Sulaimani R, Al-Meshari AA. Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian population. J Med Genetics ;32(8):623-6. 1995.

17. IPDTOC Working Group. Prevalence at birth of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: Data from the International Perinatal Database of Typical Oral Clefts (IPDTOC).;48:66-78. 2011.

18. Al-Bustan SA, El-Zawahri MM, Al-Adsani AM, Bang RL, Ghunaim I, Maher BS, et al. Epidemiological and genetic study of 121 cases of oral clefts in Kuwait. Orthodont and Craniof Res.;5(3):154-60. 2002.

19. Bonaiti C, Briard ML, Feingold J. An epidemiological and genetic study of facial clefting in France. I Epidemiology and frequency in relatives. J Med Genetics.;19(1):8-15. 1982.

20. Rajabian M, Sherkat M. An epidemiological study of oral cleft in Iran: Analysis of 1669 cases. Cleft Palate-Craniof;37(2):191-6. 2000.

21. Rakotoarison RA, Rakotoarivony AE, Rabesandratana N, Razafindrabe JB, Andriambololona R, Andriambololo-Nivo R, et al. Cleft lip and palate in Madagascar 1998-2007. Brit J Oral and Maxillofacial Surg;50(5):430-4. 2012.

22. Al-Talabani JA, Shubbar AI, Mustafa KE. Major congenital malformations in United Arab Emirates (UAE): Need for genetic counseling. Annals Human Genetics;62(5):411-8. 1998.

23. Al-Omari F, Al-Omari IK. Cleft lip and palate in Jordan: Birth prevalence rate. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J;;41(6):609-12. 2004.

24. Milerad J, Larson O, Hagberg C, Ideberg M. Associated malformations in infants with cleft lip and palate: A prospective, population-based study. Pediatrics.;100(2):180-6. 1997.

25. Mossey P, Castilla E. Global registry and database on cranilfacial anomalies. Brazil: WHO2001 4-6 December 2001 Contract No.: ISBN 92 4 1591102.

26. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Roth MP. Associated malformations in cases with oral clefts. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial J ;37(1):41-7. 2000.

27. Rawashdeh MaA, Abu-Hawas BJ. Congenital Associated Malformations in a Sample of Jordanian Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate. J Oral and Maxillofacial Surg ;66(10):2035-41. 2008.

28. Rittler M, Lopez-Camelo J, Castilla E, Bermejo E, Cocchi G, Correa A, et al. Preferential associations between oral clefts and other major congenital anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac;45:525-32. 2008.

29. Silva Filho OG, Santamaria Jr M, Da Silva Dalben G, Semb G. Prevalence of a Simonart’s band in patients with complete cleft lip and alveolus and complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniof J;43(4):442-5. 2006.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top