Minimally Invasive Clinical Approach in Indirect Pulp Therapy and Healing of Deep Carious Lesions

Indirect pulp treatment is a conservative vital pulp procedure performed in deep carious lesion approximating the pulp, but without signs or symptoms of pulp degeneration. Removing the carious biomass along with sealing the residual caries from extrinsic substrate and oral bacteria makes residual caries after the first excavation less active. This allows time for pulpo dentinal complex to form tertiary dentine so that at the second excavation, there is less likelihood of pulpal exposure. It has also been suggested that by changing the cavity environment from an active lesion into a more slowly progressing lesion, will be accompanied by more regular tubular tertiary dentin formation. The success of this approach has been demonstrated by various randomized controlled studies comparing conventional treatment of such lesions with stepwise excavation. These results are echoed at clinical, radiographic, macroscopic, microscopic and ultrastructural level during follow up visits. This study reviews promising concepts and rationale of minimally invasive indirect pulp therapy technique where conventional wisdom of caries removal is challenged.

Stepwise Excavation, Partial Caries removal, Ultrastructural, indirect pulp capping, systematic review.

1. Leksell E, Ridell K, Cvek M, Mejàre I. Pulp exposure after stepwise versus direct complete excavation of deep carious lesions in young posterior permanent teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol.12:192-6. 1996.

2. Hume WR. Need for change in standards of caries diagnosis—perspective based on the structure and behavior of the caries lesion. J Dent Educ;57:439-43.1993.

3. Miller WA, Eick JD, Neiders ME. Inorganic components of the peritubular dentin in young human permanent teeth. Caries Res ;5:264–78. 1971.

4. Tronstad L. Ultrastructural observations on human coronal dentin. Scand J Dent Res; 81:101–11. 1973

5. Kakoli P, Nandakumar R, Romberg E, Arola D, Fouad AF. The Effect of Age on Bacterial Penetration of Radicular Dentin. J Endod; 35: 78–81 .2009.

6. Oen KT, Thompson VP, Vena D, et al. Attitudes and expectations of treating deep caries: a PEARL network survey. Gen Dent;55:197–203. 2007.

7. Qudeimat MA, Al-Saiegh FA, AL-Omari Q, Omar R. Restorative decisions for deep proximal carious lesions in primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 8:37– 42. 2007.

8. Kakoli P, Nandakumar R, Romberg E, et al. The effect of age on bacterial penetration of radicular dentin. J Endod.;35:78-81 .2009.

9. Casagrande L, Bento LW, Rerin SO et al. In vivo outcomes of indirect pulp treatment using a self-etching primer versus calcium hydroxide over the demineralized dentin in primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent; 33:45-50.2008.

10. Falster CA, Araujo FB, Straffon LH, Nör JE. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex. Pediatr Dent.; 24:241-8.2002.

11. Pinto AS, deAraujo FB, Franzon R et al. Clinical and microbiological effect of calcium hydroxide protection in indirect pulp capping in primary teeth. Am J Dent;19:382-6.2006.

12. Rosenberg L,Atar M, Daronch M, etal.Prospectivestufy of indirect pulp treatment in primary molars using resin-modified glass ionomer and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate: a 12 month follow up. Pediatr Dent;35:13-17. 2013.

13. Oliveira EF, Carminatti G, Fontanella V, Maltz M. The monitoring of deep caries lesions after incomplete dentine caries removal: results after 14-18 months. Clin Oral Investig ;10:134-9.2006.

14. Duque C, Negrini T de C, Sacono NT et al. Clinical and microbiological performance of resin-modified glass-ionomer liners after incomplete dentine caries removal. Clin Oral Investig ;13: 465-71.2009.

15. Gruythuysen R, van Strijp G, Wy M-K. Long-term survival of indirect pulp treatment performed in primary and permanent teeth with clinically diagnosed deep carious lesions. J Endod; 36:1490-93.2010.

16. Bjorndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res; 31:411-7 .1997.

17. Maltz M, Henz SL, de Oliveira EF et al. Conventional caries removal and sealed caries in permanent teeth: a microbiological evaluation. J Dent ; 40:776-82. 2012.

18. FrenckenJE,MakoniF,SitholeWD,Hackenitz E. Three year survival of one surface ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe. Caries Res;32:119-126.1998.

19. Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR et al. Sealing caries in primary molars: randomized control trial, 5-year results. J Dent Res; 90:1405-10. 2011.

20. SchupbachP, GuggenheimB ,LutzF ..Human root caries.Histopathology of advanced lesions.Caries Res;24:145-58.1990.

21. Bradford EW.The dentine, a barrier to caries. .Br Dent J;109:387-98.1960.

22. Miller WA,Massler M, Permeability and staining of active and arrested lesions in dentin. Br Dent J; 112:187-97.1962.

23. Hojo S, Komatsu M, Okuda R, et al. Acid profiles and pH of carious dentin in active and arrested lesions. J Dent Res ;73: 1853-7. 1994.

24. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ,et al. Postoperative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc; 131: 321–29. 2000.

25. Murray PE, Lumley PJ, Smith AJ. Preserving the vital pulp in operative dentistry: 3. Thickness of remaining cavity dentine as a key mediator of pulpal injury and repair responses. Dent Update; 29:172-78. 2002.

26. Maltz M, Oliveira EF, Fontanella V, Bianchi RA. Clinical, microbiological, and radiographic study of deep carious lesions after incomplete caries removal. Quintessence Int; 33:151-9. 2002.

27. MasslerM.Pulpal reactions to dental caries.Int Dent J; 17:441-60.1967.

28. Murray PE, Smith AJ, Windsor LJ, Mjor IA. Remaining dentine thickness and human pulp responses. Int Endod J;36:33– 43. 2003.

29. Bergenholtz G, Lindhe J. Effect of soluble plaque factors on inflammatory reactions in the dental pulp. Scand J Dent Res; 83:153– 8. 1975.

30. Warfvinge J, Dahlen G, Bergenholtz G. Dental pulp response to bacterial cell wall material. J Dent Res; 64:1046 –50. 1985.

31. Smith AJ, Cassidy N, Perry H, et al. Reactionary dentinogenesis. Int J Dev Biol; 39:273–80. 1995.

32. McLachlan JL, Sloan AJ, Smith AJ, Landini G, Cooper PR. S100 and cytokine expression in caries. Infect Immun; 72:4102– 8. 2004.

33. Reeves R, Stanley HR. The relationship of bacterial penetration and pulpal pathosis in carious teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 22:59–65. 1966.

34. Loesche WJ, Syed SA. The predominant cultivable flora of carious plaque and carious dentine. Caries Res; 7:201–16. 1973.

35. Hoshino E. Predominant obligate anaerobes in human carious dentin. J Dent Res; 64:1195– 8. 1985.

36. Milknes AR, Bowden GH. The microflora associated with the developing lesions of nursing caries. Caries Res; 19:289 –97. 1985.

37. Chhour KL, Nadkarni MA, Byun R, Martin FE, Jacques NA, Hunter N. Molecular analysis of microbial diversity in advanced caries. J Clin Microbiol; 43:843–9. 2005.

38. Love RM,Jenkinson HF.Invasion of dentinal tubules by oral bacteria.Crit Rev Oral Biol Med;13:171-83.2002.

39. Alacam T. Evaluation of a tactile hardness test in indirect pulp capping .IntEndod J;18:274-6.1985.

40. Lula ECO, Monteiro-Neto V, Alves CMC et al. Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Caries Res; 43:354-58 .2009.

41. Lula ECO, Almeida LJS,Alves CMC,et al. Partial caries removal in primary teeth: association of clinical parameters with microbiological status. Caries Res;45:275-80 .2011.

42. Fusayama T, Okuse K, Hosoda H . Relationship between hardness, discoloration, and microbial invasion in carious dentin. J Dent Res.; 45:1033-46. 1966.

43. Smith AJ. Pulpal responses to caries and dental repair. Caries Res; 36:223– 32. 2002.

44. Paddick JS, Brailsford SR, Kidd EA, Beighton D. Phenotypic and genotypic selection of microbiota surviving under dental restorations. Appl Environ Microbiol; 71:2467 72. 2005.

45. Seale NS.Indirect pulp therapy: An alternative to pulpotomy in primary teeth.Tex Dent J;127:1175-83. 2010.

46. FuksAB.Vital pulp therapy with new materials for primary teeth:New directions and treatment perspectives.J Endod;34:S18-24.2008.

47. WeerheijmKL,Groen HJ. The residual caries dilemma.Comunity Dent Oral Epidemol;27:436-41.1999.

48. FairbournDR,CharbeeneauGT,LoescheWJ.Effect of improveddycal and IRM on bacteria in deep carious lesions.JAm Dent Assoc; 100: 547-552.1980.

49. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Guideline on pulp therapy for primary and immature permanent teeth.2010-2011.Available at: http:// www.aapd.org/media/policies_guidelines/G_Pulp.pdf ”.

50. Duque C,Hebling J,Smith AJ,et al. Reactionary dentinogenesis after applying restorative materials and bioactive dentine matrix molecules as liners in deep cavities prepared in non-human primate teeth. J Oral Rehabil;33:453-61.2006.