Article Data

  • Views 757
  • Dowloads 135

Original Research

Open Access

Assessment of Skeletal Maturation using Mandibular Second Molar Maturation Stages

  • Goyal S1,*,
  • Goyal S2
  • Gugnani N3

1King Faisal Hospital and Research Centre,Rwanda Biomedical Centre Kigali, Rwanda

2Polyclinique LaMedicale, Kigali

3Dept of Pedodontics, DAV Dental College, Yamunanagar, Haryana, India

DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.39.1.9224022173577151 Vol.39,Issue 1,January 2015 pp.79-84

Published: 01 January 2015

*Corresponding Author(s): Goyal S E-mail: goyalsandeep2000@rediffmail.com

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between cervical vertebrae maturation and mandibular second molar calcification stages.Study design: The study was designed as a retrospective, descriptive and crosssectional research project. Pre-treatment lateral cephalograms and panoramic radiographs of 99 males and 110 females in the age range of 7 to 18 years 7 months were evaluated with Demirjian Index (DI) and cervical vertebrae maturation indicators (CVMI) of Hassel and Farman. A null hypothesis was proposed that there is no relation between CVMI and DI. Results: A highly significant association (Pearson's contingency coefficient 0.713 for males and 0.863 for females) was found between DI and CVMI. In males, the DI stage E corresponded to stage 2 of CVMI (pre–peak of pubertal growth spurt) and DI stages F and G corresponded to stages 3 and 4 of CVMI (peak of pubertal growth spurt). DI stage H was associated with stages 5 and 6 of CVMI (end of pubertal growth spurt). In females, the DI stages C, D corresponded to CVMI stages 1, 2; DI stages E, F with CVMI stages 3, 4; DI stages G, H with CVMI stages 5, 6. Conclusion: Mandibular second molar calcification stages can be used as indicators for assessment of skeletal maturity.

Keywords

Skeletal maturation, Cervical vertebrae maturation indicators, Demirjian Index, Mandibular second molar

Cite and Share

Goyal S,Goyal S,Gugnani N. Assessment of Skeletal Maturation using Mandibular Second Molar Maturation Stages. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2015. 39(1);79-84.

References

1. Krailassiri S, Anuwongnukroh N, Dechkunakorn S. Relationship between dental calcification stages and skeletal maturity indicators in Thai individ-uals. Angle Orthod, 72: 155–166, 2002.

2. Morris JM, Park JH. Correlation of dental maturity with skeletal maturity from radiographic assessment: a review. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 36: 309-314, 2012.

3. Bjork A. Timing of interceptive orthodontic measures based on stages of maturation. Trans Eur Orthod Soc, 48: 61–74, 1972.

4. Moore RN, Moyer BA, DuBois LM. Skeletal maturation and craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 98: 33- 40, 1990.

5. Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 107: 58–66, 1995.

6. Hunter CJ. The correlation of facial growth with body height and skeletal maturation at adolescence. Angle Orthod, 36: 44–54, 1966.

7. Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod, 52: 88–112, 1982.

8. Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Major PW. Use of skeletal maturation based on hand-wrist radiographic analysis as a predictor of facial growth: a system-atic review. Angle Orthod, 74: 118–124, 2004.

9. Sidlauskas A, Zilinskaite L, Svalkauskiene V. Mandibular pubertal growth spurt prediction. Part one: Method based on the hand-wrist radio-graphs. Stomatologija, 7: 16–20, 2005.

10. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod, 72: 316–323, 2002.

11. San Roman P, Palma JC, Oteo MD, Nevado E. Skeletal maturation deter-mined by cervical vertebrae development. Eur J Orthod, 24: 303–311, 2002.

12. Kamal M, Goyal S. Comparative evaluation of hand wrist radiographs with cervical vertebrae for skeletal maturation in 10-12 years old chil-dren. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 24: 127–135, 2006.

13. Gandini P, Mancini M, Andreani F. A comparison of hand-wrist bone and cervical vertebral analyses in measuring skeletal maturation. Angle Orthod, 76: 984–989, 2006.

14. Başaran G, Ozer T, Hamamci N. Cervical vertebral and dental maturity in Turkish subjects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 131: 447.e13–20, 2007.

15. Lai EH, Liu J, Chang JZ, et al. Radiographic assessment of skeletal maturation stages for orthodontic patients: hand-wrist bones or cervical vertebrae? J Formos Med Assoc, 107: 316–325, 2008.

16. Uysal T, Sari Z, Ramoglu SI, Basciftci FA. Relationships between dental and skeletal maturity in Turkish subjects. Angle Orthod, 74: 657–664, 2004.

17. Kumar S, Singla A, Sharma R, Virdi MS, Anupam A, Mittal B. Skel-etal maturation evaluation using mandibular second molar calcification stages. Angle Orthod, 82: 501–506, 2012.

18. Mappes MS, Harris EF, Behrents RG. An example of regional variation in the tempos of tooth mineralization and hand-wrist ossification. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 101: 145–151, 1992.

19. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assess-ment. Human Biol, 45: 211–227, 1973.

20. Chertkow S. Tooth mineralization as an indication of the pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod, 77: 79–91, 1980.

21. Sierra AM. Assessment of dental and skeletal maturity. A new approach. Angle Orthod, 57: 194–198, 1987.

22. Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. Angle Orthod, 52: 88–112, 1982.

23. Ha¨gg U, Taranger J. Skeletal stages of the hand and wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontol Scand, 38(3): 187–200, 1980.

24. Grave KG. Physiological indicators in orthodontic diagnosis and treat-ment planning. Aust Orthod J, 5: 114–122, 1978.

25. Grave K. The use of the hand and wrist radiograph in skeletal age assess-ment; and why skeletal age assessment is important. Aust Orthod J, 13: 96, 1994.

26. Coutinho S, Buschang PH, Miranda F. Relationship between mandibular canine calcification stages and skeletal maturity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 104: 262–268, 1993.

27. Hareesha KB, Babu NC. Co-relation between mandibular canine calcifi-cation stages and skeletal maturity. J Int Oral Health, 2(3): 41–47, 2010.

28. Demisch S, Wartmann C. Calcification of mandibular third molar and its relationship to skeletal and chronological age in children. Child Dev, 27: 459–473, 1956.

29. Engstro¨m C, Engstro¨m H, Sagne S. Lower third molar development in relation to skeletal maturity and chronological age. Angle Orthod, 53: 97–106, 1983.

30. Cho SM, Hwang CJ. Skeletal maturation evaluation using mandibular third molar. Korean J Orthod, 39(2): 120–129, 2009.

31. Nolla CM. The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child, 27: 254–263, 1960.

32. Van der Linden FP. Transition of the Human Dentition. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, 1979.

33. Soegiharto BM, Moles DR, and Cunningham SJ. Discriminatory ability of the skeletal maturation index and the cervical vertebrae maturation index in detecting peak pubertal growth in Indonesian and white subjects with receiver operating characteristics analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 134: 227-37, 2008.

34. Dabla N, Sehgal V, Gupta R, Chandna AK, Pradhan KL. A comparative evaluation of modified MP3 and CVMI stages as maturation indicators. J Ind Orthod Soc, 39: 147-154, 2006.

35. Bjork A, Helm S. Prediction of the age of maximum pubertal growth in body height. Angle Orthod, 37: 134–143, 1967.

Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top