Comparisons of Varying Dosages of Chloral Hydrate-Hydroxyzine with and without Meperidine for Managing Challenging Pediatric Dental Behavior: A Retrospective study of 35 years of Sedation Experiences

Purpose: This retrospective study compares the efficacy and safety of variable dosing of Chloral Hydrate – Hydroxyzine with and without Meperidine (Mep)for managing varying levels of anxiety and uncooperative behavior of young pediatric dental patients over a 35-year period. Study design: Reviews of the sedation logs of 2,610 children, 3-7 years were compared in search of what dosing proves safe and effective for differing levels of challenging behavior. Variable dosing of CH with and without Mep were judged using a pragmatic approach which defined sedation success as optimal, adequate, inadequate, or over-dosage using oneway analysis of variance. Descriptive analyses of behavior and physiologic assessment was included with regard to the extent to which physical restraint occurred to control interfering behavior. Arousal levels requiring stimulation, oxygen desaturation, and adverse reactions were included as indications of safety. Results: Where Mep was used, success rates were consistently higher; need for higher-end dosing of CH was not found beneficial when Mep was included. Significantly less need for physical restraint accompanied the addition of Mep. Conclusions: There appears to be strong basis for the safety and efficacy of the use of CH-H-Mep in combination at lower dosing than historically used. Addition of Mep was observed to enhance sedations, permit lower CH dosing, lessen or eliminate the need for physical restraint and adverse reactions.

Chloral Hydrate; Hydroxyzine ; Meperidine; Children

1. Nathan JE. The disappearance of Chloral Hydrate as an effective sedative for management of young pediatric dental patients: An inappropriate and unfortunate outcome J Pharmacol Clin Res, 2018; 6(1)1-3.

2. Wilson, S and Nathan, JE A study in sedation training in advanced Pediatric Dental Training Residencies, Ped Dent, 2011 ;33(4) 353-360.

3. Vargas, KG, Nathan, JE Quilian, F, Kupietsky, A Use of restraint and management style for defining sedation success: a survey of pediatric dentists , Ped Dent,2007; 29(3)220-227.

4. Nathan, JE Controversies in Behavior Guidance and Management of Challenging Pediatric Dental Behavior an d Anxiety, Avoidance of Restraints wherever possible, J pediatric and Neonatal Disorders , 2018; 1 (3)301-305.

5. Weinstein, P and Nathan, JE Management of the Dentally–Phobic Child , Chapter In Dental Phobia and Anxiety, eds Rubin and Kaplan, Dent Clin North America, 1987; 32(4)437-444.

6. Nathan, JE Behavior Management of the Pre-Cooperative Child, Chapter in Dental Care for the Pre-school Child, eds Tinanoff and Johnsen, Dent Clin North America, , 1995; 39:789-816.

7. Chloral Hydrate, Toxicological Reviews of Chloral Hydrate, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ,Washington, DC, 2000.

8. Cote, CJ, Karl, HW, Notterman, DA, Weinberg, JA, and McClosky, C, Adverse sedation Events: Analysis of medications used in sedation, Pediatrics ,2000; 106:633-644.

9. Cote, CJ, and Wilson, S Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures update, 2016, Ped Dent , 2016; 38(4)13E-39-E.

10. Nathan, JE Morbidity and Mortality involving pediatric dental sedation: non-compliance following sedation guidelines, J of Surgery, Omnics Internationa,2016; 1(1)1-3.

11. Nathan, JE Practical Approaches To Avoid Mishaps adverse reactions and catastrophic outcomes, J Pharmacology and Clin Research, 2017; 2(4)1-3.

12. Cravero, JP, Blike, GT, et al, The incidence and nature of adverse events during pediatric sedation/anesthesia outside the operating room; Report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium, Pediatrics, 2006; 118(3) 1087-1096.

13. Lee, HH, Milgrom, P, Starks, H, and Burke, W, Trends in Death associated with pediatric dental sedation and general anesthesia, Ped Anes-thesia, 2013; 23(8)741-746.

14. Goodson, JM, and Moore, PA, Life threatening reactions after pedodontic sedation: an assessment of narcotic, local anesthetic and anti-emetic drug interactions, JADA, 1983; 107:239-245,.

15. Moore, PA, Hickey,EA, Hargreaves, JA, and Needleman, HL, Sedation in pediatric dentistry: a practical assessment procedure, JADA, 1984; 109(4)564-569.

16. Wilson, S A ,review of important elements in sedation study methodology, Ped Dent, 1995; 17. 406-412.

17. Nathan, JE Defining therapeutic success in pediatric conscious sedation, J Southeastern Soc Ped Dentistry, 1988; 4(4)26-27.

18. Nathan, JE, The Subtleties and Nuances of Pediatric Sedation for managing the apprehensive child patient, J Otolaryng and Rhinology, 2015; 1(1) 1-2.

19. Murphy, MG, Fields, HW, Machen, JB, Parental Acceptance of Pediatric Dentistry behavior management techniques, Ped Dent, 1984; 6:193-198.

20. Lawrence, SM, McTigue, DJ et al, Parental Attitudes toward Behavior Management Techniques, Ped Dent, 1991; 13:151-156.

21. Casamassimo, PJ, Wilson, S, Gross, L, Effects of changing U.S. Parenting Styles on Dental Practice: Perceptions of Pediatric Diplomates of the ABPD, Ped Dent, 2002; 24:18-22.

22. Adair, SM, Waller, JL, Schafer, TE, Rockman, RA, A survey of the members of the AAPD on their use of behavior management techniques, Ped Dent, 2004; 26(2)159-166.

23. Wilson,S and Houpt, MI Project USAP 2010: Use of Sedative Agents in Pediatric Dentistry – a 25 year follow-up Survey, Ped Dent, 2016; 38(2)127- 134.

24. Nathan, JE and West, MS , Comparison of Chloral hydrate-Hydroxyzine with and without Meperidine for management of difficult pediatric dental patients, J Dent Child, 1987;54:22-29, March-April.

25. Houpt, MI et al Assessing Chloral hydrate dosage for young children, J Dent Child, 1985; 52:364-369.

26. Houpt, MI, Weiss, NJ, Koenigsberg, SR, et al Comparison of Chloral hydrate with and without promethazine in the sedation of children, Ped Dent , 1985; 7:41-46.

27. Poorman, T Farrington, Mourino, AP A comparison of Chloral hydrate-Hydroxyzine combination with and without meperidine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients, Ped Dent, 1990; 12:2889-291.

28. Houpt, MI, Maneta,C, Joshi A , et al Effects of Chloral hydrate on nitrous oxide in Children, Ped Dent 11:26-29, 1989.

29. Meyer, ML, Mourino,AP, Farrington, FH Comparison of Triazolam to Chloral Hydrate-Hydroxyzine in the sedation of pediatric dental patients, Ped Dent , 1990; 12:283-287.

30. Hasty , MF, Vann, WF,Jr, Dilley, DC, and Anderson, JA, Conscious sedation of pediatric dental patients using Chloral Hydrate-Hydroxyzine and Meperidine vs Chloral hydrate-Hydroxyzine, Ped Dent , 1991; 13(1)10-19.

31. Needleman, HL, Joshi, A, Griffin, DG, Conscious Sedation of pediatric dental patients using CH-H and nitrous oxide: a retrospective study of 382 sedations, Ped Dent, 1995; 17(7)424-431.

32. Wilson, S, Easton, J, Lamb, K, Orchardson,R, and Casamassimo, PJ A retrospective study of chloral hydrate-meperidine –hydroxyzine and midazolam regimens used to sedate children for dental care, Ped Dent , 2000; 22(2) 107-112.

33. Choudhury, J, Vargas, KG, Comparison of Chloral hydrate, meperidine and hydroxyzine to midazolam regimens for oral sedation of pediatric dental patients, Ped Dent, 2005; 27(3)191-197.

34. Maher, LE, Tucker, GT, Systematic availability of orally administered Meperidine, Clinical Pharmacol Ther ,1976; 20:535-540.

35. Lampshire, EL Balanced medication, J.Dent Child, 1959 ;26:25.

36. Robbins, MB Chloral Hydrate and Promethazine as premedication for the apprehensive child, J Dent Child , 1967; 34:327.

37. Trapp, L, Pharmacologic Management , in Pediatric Dentistry: Scientific Foundations, in Stewart, Barber, Troutman and Wei, St. Louis: Mosby, 1972, 1982.

38. L. Trapp ,Personal communication, Sept, 1980.

39. Musselman, RJ, McClure, DB, Pharmacotherapeutic Approaches to Behavior Management, Chapter 8, in Behavior Management in Dentistry for Children, ed GZ Wright, Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 146-154, 1975.