Article Data

  • Views 4875
  • Dowloads 646

Systematic reviews

Open Access

Hemifacial microsomia: treatment alternatives—a systematic review of literature

  • López D F1,*,
  • Acosta D M1
  • Rivera D A1
  • Mejía C M2

1Orthodontics Graduate Program, School of Dentistry, Universidad del Valle, Colombia

2Private Practice Clínica Orthos Manizales, Colombia

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2022.003 Vol.46,Issue 5,September 2022 pp.15-30

Published: 01 September 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): López D F E-mail: dr.diegolopez10@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review literature on therapeutic options for treating hemifacial microsomia (HFM), in young patients with growth potential, classifying and comparing the different dentofacial treatment methods. Study design: An independent review of databases (Scopus, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library and PubMed) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), conducted by four evaluators. The protocol of this study was registered in International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROS-PERO), under the number CRD42021293076. Results: Between 1970–2021, a total number of 1137 articles were published of which 27 were included in this study according to the selection criteria: one randomized multicentric trial, two case-control studies, three case series and 21 case reports. Conclusions: The most common orthopedic treatments provide vertical stimulation of the maxillary process in the affected side. Orthodontic approaches are mainly applied for vertical correction and stabilization of the occlusal plane. Other treatment options include orthognathic surgery, osteogenic distraction, temporomandibular reconstruction and grafting. It is recommended that prospective clinical randomized controlled studies be conducted using homogeneous pediatric groups with long-term follow-up, to establish recommended evidence-based methods for treating each set of hemifacial microsomia symptoms.


Keywords

Hemifacial microsomia; Craniofacial malformation; Facial asymmetry; Orthodontics; Orthopedics; Orthognathic surgery


Cite and Share

López D F,Acosta D M,Rivera D A,Mejía C M. Hemifacial microsomia: treatment alternatives—a systematic review of literature. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2022. 46(5);15-30.

References

1. Monahan R, Seder K, Patel P, Alder M, Grud S, O’gara M. Hemifacial microsomia. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2001; 132: 1402–1408.

2. Véliz M S, Agurto V P, Leiva V N. Hemifacial microsomia. A literature review. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2016; 27: 404–424.

3. Cousley RRJ, Calvert ML. Current concepts in the understanding and management of hemifacial microsomia. British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1997; 50: 536–551.

4. Heike CL, Hing A V, Aspinall CA, Bartlett SP, Birgfeld CB, Drake AF, et al. Clinical care in craniofacial microsomia: a review of current management recommendations and opportunities to advance research. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C, Seminars in Medical Genetics. 2013; 163: 271–282.

5. Wang J, Liu E, Du L, Hu M. Soft tissue damage in patients with hemifacial microsomia. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2019; 30: 2449–2450.

6. Huisinga-Fischer CE, Vaandrager JM, Prahl-Andersen B, van Ginkel FC. Masticatory muscle right-left differences in controls and hemifacial microsomia patients. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2004; 15: 42–46.

7. Huisinga-Fischer CE, Zonneveld FW, Vaandrager JM, Prahl-Andersen B. Relationship in hypoplasia between the masticatory muscles and the craniofacial skeleton in hemifacial microsomia, as determined by 3-D CT imaging. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2001; 12: 31–40.

8. Cassi D, Magnifico M, Gandolfinini M, Kasa I, Mauro G, Di Blasio A. Early orthopaedic treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2017; 2017: 1–6.

9. Bogusiak K, Puch A, Arkuszewski P. Goldenhar syndrome: current perspectives. World Journal of Pediatrics. 2017; 13: 405–415.

10. Mielnik-BŁaszczak M, Olszewska K. Hemifacial microsomia—review of the literature. Dental and Medical Problems. 2011; 48: 80–85.

11. Johnson JM, Moonis G, Green GE, Carmody R, Burbank HN. Syndromes of the first and second branchial arches, part 1 : embryology and characteristic defects. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2011; 32: 14–19.

12. Werler MM, Sheehan JE, Hayes C, Mitchell AA, Mulliken JB. Vasoactive exposures, vascular events, and hemifacial microsomia. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology. 2004; 70: 389–395.

13. Siebold B, Heike CL, Leroux BG, Speltz ML, Drake AF, Johns AL, et al. Evaluation of prenatal diabetes mellitus and other risk factors for craniofacial microsomia. Birth Defects Research. 2019; 111: 649–658.

14. Pruzansky S. Not all dwarfed mandibles are alike. Birth Defects. 1969; 5: 120–129.

15. Kaban LB, Moses MH, Mulliken JB. Surgical correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1988; 82: 9–19.

16. Vento AR, LaBrie RA, Mulliken JB. The O.M.E.N.S. classification of hemifacial microsomia. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal: Official Publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial. 1991; 28: 68–76.

17. Perrotta S, Bocchino T, D’Antò V, Michelotti A, Valletta R. Pseudo hemifacial microsomia with condylar-coronoid collapse: new therapeutic approach in growing patients. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2020; 31: 2128–2131.

18. Beleza-Meireles A, Clayton-Smith J, Saraiva JM, Tassabehji M. Oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum: a review of the literature and genetic update. Journal of Medical Genetics. 2014; 51: 635–645.

19. Cohen MMJ, Rollnick BR, Kaye CI. Oculoauriculovertebral spectrum: an updated critique. The Cleft Palate Journal. 1989; 26: 276–286.

20. Horgan JE, Padwa BL, LaBrie RA, Mulliken JB. OMENS-plus: analysis of craniofacial and extracraniofacial anomalies in hemifacial microsomia. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 1995; 32: 405–412.

21. Pierpont MEM, Moller JH, Gorlin RJ, Edwards JE. Congenital cardiac, pulmonary, and vascular malformations in oculoauriculover-tebral dysplasia. Pediatric Cardiology. 1982; 2: 297–302.

22. Monahan R, Seder K, Patel P, Alder M, Grud S, O’gara M. Hemifacial microsomia. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2001; 132: 1402–1408.

23. Kahl-Nieke B, Fischbach R. Effect of early orthopedic intervention on hemifacial microsomia patients: an approach to a cooperative evaluation of treatment results. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1998; 114: 538–550.

24. Choi S, Kang D, Hwang C. Adult patient with hemifacial microsomia treated with combined orthodontics and distraction osteogenesis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2014; 145: 72–84.

25. Zanardi G, Parente EV, Esteves LS, Louro RS, Capelli J. Orthodontic and surgical treatment of a patient with hemifacial microsomia. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2012; 141: S130–S139.

26. Kim S, Seo Y, Choi TH, Baek S. New approach for the surgico-orthodontic treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Journal of Cran-iofacial Surgery. 2012; 23: 957-963.

27. Moulin-Romsée C, Verdonck A, Schoenaers J, Carels C. Clinical section: treatment of hemifacial microsomia in a growing child: the importance of co-operation between the orthodontist and the maxillofacial surgeon. Journal of Orthodontics. 2004; 31: 190–200.

28. Takashima M, Kitai N, Mori Y, Murakami S, Kreiborg S, Takada K. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis using an intraoral device and bite plate for a case of hemifacial microsomia. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2003; 40: 437–445.

29. Amm EW. Three-year follow-up of a patient with hemifacial microsomia treated with distraction osteogenesis, temporary anchor-age devices, and orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2012; 142: 115–128.

30. Papagrigorakis MJ, Karamolegou M, Vilos G, Apostolidis C, Karamesinis K, Synodinos PN. Auriculo-condylar syndrome. The Angle Orthodontist. 2012; 82: 556–564.

31. Alonso-ferna S, Urru G, Jose J. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2021; 74: 790–799.

32. Murad MH, Sultan S, Haffar S, Bazerbachi F. Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2018; 23: 60–63.

33. Ito A, Tachiki K, Shioyasono R, Ashtar M, Watanabe K, Hiasa M, et al. Hemifacial microsomia caused by first and second brachial arch syndrome treated with orthodontic approach: a case report. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2021; 21: 1189–1195.

34. Yamashiro T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Takada K. Case report: dentofacial orthopedic and surgical orthodontic treatment in hemifacial microsomia. The Angle Orthodontist. 1997; 67: 463–466.

35. Robinson M, Stoughton D. Surgical-orthodontic treatment of a case of hemifacial microsomia. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1970; 57: 287–292.

36. Agurto Veas P, Castellón Zirpel L, Morovic CG. Craniofacial microsomia. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2018; 29: 1426–1429.

37. Nouri M, Farzan A. Nonsurgical treatment of hemifacial microsomia: a case report. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal. 2015; 17: e19920.

38. Sarnäs KV, Pancherz H, Rune B, Selvik G. Hemifacial microso-mia treated with the Herbst appliance. Report of a case analyzed by means of roentgen stereometry and metallic implants. American Journal of Orthodontics. 1982; 82: 68–74.

39. Seo J, Roh Y, Song J, Song W, Seong H, Kim S, et al. Sequential treatment for a patient with hemifacial microsomia: 10 year-long term follow up. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2015; 37: 3.

40. Chung NH, Yang SJ, Kang JY, Jeon Y, Kim JG. Growth observation and orthodontic treatment of a hemifacial microsomia patient treated with distraction osteogenesis. The Korean Journal of Or-thodontics. 2020; 50: 136.

41. Mejia-Gomez CM, Ramirez-Yanez GO. Mandibular condylar aplasia treated with a functional approach. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2013; 38: 179–184.

42. Leonardi R, Barbato E. Technical strategy mandibular asymmetry treated with a modified activator appliance. The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2007; 18: 939–943.

43. Balasubramanian B, Venkatachalapathy S, Natarajan K, et al. Facial Asymmetry due to Hemifacial Microsomia Managed by an Interdisciplinary Approach: A Case Report. World J Dent 2021;12(5):427–432.

44. Yamada H, Sawada M, Tanaka E. Treatment of hemifacial microsomia using conventional orthodontic techniques. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2021; 152: 653–668.

45. El-Bialy T, Hasan A, Janadas A, Albaghdadi T. Microsomia by therapeutic ultrasound and hybrid functional appliance. Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials. 2010; 2: 29–36.

46. Silvestri A, Natali G, Iannetti G. Functional therapy in hemifacial microsomia: therapeutic protocol for growing children. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1996; 54: 271–278.

47. Tehranchi A, Behnia H. Facial symmetry after distraction osteogenesis and orthodontic therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2001; 120: 149–153.

48. Wang J, Yuan L, Liu J, Mao L, Xia L, Fang B. Hemifacial microsomia treated with a hybrid technique combining distraction osteogenesis and a mandible-guided functional appliance: pilot study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2019; 155: 801–811.

49. Suppapinyaroj C, Lin CH, Lo LJ, Ko EW. Outcome of surgicalorthodontic treatment in hemifacial microsomia with and without early mandibular distraction osteogenesis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021; 50: 763–773.

50. Qiu X, Sun H, Zhu M, Chen X, Chai G, Yang X, et al. Using orthodontic elastic traction during the active period of distraction osteogenesis to increase the effective vertical extension of hemifacial microsomia patients: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2021; 49: 1054–1063.

51. Meazzini MC, Mazzoleni F, Bozzetti A, Brusati R. Does functional appliance treatment truly improve stability of mandibular vertical distraction osteogenesis in hemifacial microsomia? Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2008; 36: 384–389.

52. Kwak Y, Jang I, Choi D, Cha B. Functional evaluation of orthopedic and orthodontic treatment in a patient with unilateral posterior crossbite and facial asymmetry. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2014; 44: 143.

53. Björk A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. Journal of Dental Research. 1963; 42: 400–411.

54. Nakai M, Abe M, Miyazaki A, Fujimiya M, Hiratsuka H. Macroscopic and microscopic features of the mandibular condyle in au-topsied elderly individuals. Clinical Anatomy. 2014; 27: 399–407. doi:10.1002/ca.22102.

55. Aarts BE, Convens J, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Fudalej PS. Cessation of facial growth in subjects with short, average, and long facial types—implications for the timing of implant placement. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2015; 43: 2106–2111.

56. Sidiropoulou S, Antoniades K, Kolokithas G. Orthopedically induced condylar growth in a patient with hemifacial microsomia. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2003; 40: 645–650.

57. Melsen B, Bjerregaard J, Bundgaard M. The effect of treatment with functional appliance on a pathologic growth pattern of the condyle. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1986; 90: 503–512.

58. Hernández CP, Rosell V. Multidisciplinary approach in a case of hemifacial microsomia: speech and language pathologist contributions. Rev. Investig. Logop. 2019; 9: 17–27.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top