Article Menu

Export Article

More by Authors Links

Article Data

  • Views 1704
  • Dowloads 304

Original Research

Open Access

Characteristics and attitudes of general and pediatric dentists who use loupes

  • Johnny Kharouba1,*,
  • Moran Rubanenko1
  • Sereen Bwerat1
  • Dora Shechter1
  • Sigalit Blumer1

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

DOI: 10.22514/jocpd.2022.006 Vol.46,Issue 5,September 2022 pp.44-50

Published: 01 September 2022

*Corresponding Author(s): Johnny Kharouba E-mail: johny156@013net.net

PDF (544.27 kB) View Full-text

Abstract

Background: Dental loupes are used by dental professionals to improve visual performance, reduce eye strain and prevent musculoskeletal disorders. Data on their usage in pediatric dentistry are scarce. Study design: We performed a cross-sectional survey to evaluate the approach, knowledge, and frequency of using loupes among 100 general and pediatric dentists. Results: showed that the use of loupes is significantly more prevalent among general dentists (64.3%) compared to pediatric specialists and residents (35.7%). Among dentists who reported that they do not use loupes, 63.6% were pediatric dentists and residents, and 82.5% were dentists working with children. A significantly higher percentage of dentists who self-reported as loupes users perceived that the loupes afford comfortable and stable posture, confidence while working, and contribute to the detection of tooth decay. A significantly higher percentage of dentists who self-reported as non-users of loupes (compared to loupes users), claimed that they weaken the eyes, require long adjustment, and cause discomfort. Conclusion: Although the use of loupes in general dentistry is becoming more prevalent, there is still a need to raise awareness for this vision aid among pediatric dentists while promoting its advantages, to reap benefits associated with their usage.


Keywords

Pediatric dentistry; Loupes; Magnification; Accuracy; Caries detection


Cite and Share

Johnny Kharouba,Moran Rubanenko,Sereen Bwerat,Dora Shechter,Sigalit Blumer. Characteristics and attitudes of general and pediatric dentists who use loupes. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2022. 46(5);44-50.

URL:

https://www.jocpd.com/articles/10.22514/jocpd.2022.006

References

1. Lietz J, Kozak A, Nienhaus A. Prevalence and occupational risk factors of musculoskeletal diseases and pain among dental professionals in Western countries: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0208628.

2. Hayes MJ, Smith DR, Cockrell D. An international review of musculoskeletal disorders in the dental hygiene profession. International Dental Journal. 2010; 60: 343–352.

3. Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Bringolf U, Lussi A. Influence of loupes and age on the near visual acuity of practicing dentists. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2011; 16: 035003.

4. Wajngarten D, Botta AC, Garcia PPNS. Magnification loupes in dentistry: a qualitative study of dental students’ perspectives. European Journal of Dental Education. 2021; 25: 305–309.

5. Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Ramseyer ST, Lussi A. Visual acuity and experience with magnification devices in swiss dental practices. Operative Dentistry. 2015; 40: E142–E149.

6. Stanbury SJ, Elfar J. The use of surgical loupes in microsurgery. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2011; 36: 154–156.

7. James T, Gilmour AS. Magnifying loupes in modern dental practice: an update. Dental Update. 2010; 37: 633–636.

8. Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A. The impact of loupes and microscopes on vision in endodontics. International Endodontic Journal. 2014; 47: 425–429.

9. Eichenberger M, Perrin P, Neuhaus KW, Bringolf U, Lussi A. Visual acuity of dentists under simulated clinical conditions. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2013; 17: 725–729.

10. Kundabala M, Shetty N, Shenoy R, Narula K. Evaluation of tooth preparations for class II cavities using magnification loupes among dental interns and final year BDS students in preclinical laboratory. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2015; 18: 284.

11. Braga T, Robb N, Love RM, Amaral RR, Rodrigues VP, Camargo JMP, et al. The impact of the use of magnifying dental loupes on the performance of undergraduate dental students undertaking simulated dental procedures. Journal of Dental Education. 2021; 85: 418–426.

12. Eichenberger M, Biner N, Amato M, Lussi A, Perrin P. Effect of magnification on the precision of tooth preparation in dentistry. Operative Dentistry. 2018; 43: 501–507.

13. Wong AW, Zhu X, Zhang S, Li SK, Zhang C, Chu C. Treatment time for non-surgical endodontic therapy with or without a magnifying loupe. BMC Oral Health. 2015; 15: 40.

14. Carpentier M, Aubeux D, Armengol V, Pérez F, Prud’homme T, Gaudin A. The effect of magnification loupes on spontaneous posture change of dental students during preclinical restorative training. Journal of Dental Education. 2019; 83: 407–415.

15. Plessas A, Bernardes Delgado M. The role of ergonomic saddle seats and magnification loupes in the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders. A systematic review. International Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2018; 16: 430–440.

16. Branson BG, Bray KK, Gadbury-Amyot C, Holt LA, Keselyak NT, Mitchell TV, et al. Effect of magnification lenses on student operator posture. Journal of Dental Education. 2004; 68: 384–389.

17. Jennifer R, Thomas FD. Dental hygienists’ opinions about loupes in education. Journal of Dental Hygiene. 2007; 81: 82.

18. Penmetsa GS, Mani LP, Praveen G, Dwarakanath CD, Suresh

S. Awareness, attitude, and prevalence of usage of magnification devices among the dental practitioners in the state of andhra Pradesh—a questionnaire-based study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2017; 21: 398–402.

19. Aboalshamat K, Daoud O, Mahmoud LA, Attal S, Alshehri R, Bin Othman D, et al. Practices and attitudes of dental loupes and their relationship to musculoskeletal disorders among dental practitioners. International Journal of Dentistry. 2020; 2020: 1–7.

20. Basunbul GI. Use of magnifying loupes among dental professionals. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2018; 19: 1531–1537.

21. Farook SA, Stokes RJ, Davis AKJ, Sneddon K, Collyer J. Use of dental loupes among dental trainers and trainees in the UK. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry. 2013; 4: 120–123.

22. Christensen GJ. Magnification in dentistry. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2003; 134: 1647–1650.

23. Maggio MP, Villegas H, Blatz MB. The effect of magnification loupes on the performance of preclinical dental students. Quintessence International. 2011; 42: 45–55.

24. Aldosari MA. Dental magnification loupes: an update of the evidence. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2021; 22: 310–315.

25. Low JF, Dom TNM, Baharin SA. Magnification in endodontics: a review of its application and acceptance among dental practitioners. European Journal of Dentistry. 2018; 12: 610–616.

26. Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M, Weinstein T, Rosen E, Tsesis I. Magnification in modern endodontic practice. Journal of the Israel Dental Association. 2010; 27: 18–22.

27. Baumann DF, Brauchli L, van Waes H. The influence of dental loupes on the quality of adhesive removal in orthodontic debonding. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics. 2011; 72: 125–132.


Abstracted / indexed in

Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch) Created as SCI in 1964, Science Citation Index Expanded now indexes over 9,500 of the world’s most impactful journals across 178 scientific disciplines. More than 53 million records and 1.18 billion cited references date back from 1900 to present.

Biological Abstracts Easily discover critical journal coverage of the life sciences with Biological Abstracts, produced by the Web of Science Group, with topics ranging from botany to microbiology to pharmacology. Including BIOSIS indexing and MeSH terms, specialized indexing in Biological Abstracts helps you to discover more accurate, context-sensitive results.

Google Scholar Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text or metadata of scholarly literature across an array of publishing formats and disciplines.

JournalSeek Genamics JournalSeek is the largest completely categorized database of freely available journal information available on the internet. The database presently contains 39226 titles. Journal information includes the description (aims and scope), journal abbreviation, journal homepage link, subject category and ISSN.

Current Contents - Clinical Medicine Current Contents - Clinical Medicine provides easy access to complete tables of contents, abstracts, bibliographic information and all other significant items in recently published issues from over 1,000 leading journals in clinical medicine.

BIOSIS Previews BIOSIS Previews is an English-language, bibliographic database service, with abstracts and citation indexing. It is part of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science suite. BIOSIS Previews indexes data from 1926 to the present.

Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition aims to evaluate a journal’s value from multiple perspectives including the journal impact factor, descriptive data about a journal’s open access content as well as contributing authors, and provide readers a transparent and publisher-neutral data & statistics information about the journal.

Scopus: CiteScore 2.0 (2022) Scopus is Elsevier's abstract and citation database launched in 2004. Scopus covers nearly 36,377 titles (22,794 active titles and 13,583 Inactive titles) from approximately 11,678 publishers, of which 34,346 are peer-reviewed journals in top-level subject fields: life sciences, social sciences, physical sciences and health sciences.

Submission Turnaround Time

Conferences

Top